PWV vs. DIVZ
PWV (Invesco Large Cap Value ETF) and DIVZ (Opal Dividend Income ETF) are both Large Cap Value Equities funds. PWV is passively managed, while DIVZ is actively managed. Over the past 5 years, PWV returned 15.09%/yr vs 9.85%/yr for DIVZ. Their correlation of 0.87 means they have usually moved in the same direction. PWV charges 0.55%/yr vs 0.65%/yr for DIVZ.
Performance
PWV vs. DIVZ - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, PWV achieves a 21.38% return, which is significantly higher than DIVZ's 7.01% return.
PWV
- 1D
- -0.16%
- 1M
- 3.06%
- 6M
- 17.74%
- YTD
- 21.38%
- 1Y
- 33.04%
- 3Y*
- 20.95%
- 5Y*
- 15.09%
- 10Y*
- 12.21%
- ALL TIME*
- 10.52%
DIVZ
- 1D
- -0.07%
- 1M
- 0.52%
- 6M
- 2.82%
- YTD
- 7.01%
- 1Y
- 11.19%
- 3Y*
- 14.79%
- 5Y*
- 9.85%
- 10Y*
- —
- ALL TIME*
- 11.40%
Liquidity Comparison
| Position | Avg. Volume Value (2W) | Avg. Volume Value (1M) | Avg. Volume Value (3M) |
|---|---|---|---|
| $821.38K | $1.64M | $1.38M | |
| $10.73M | $7.77M | $4.99M |
PWV vs. DIVZ - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
PWV Invesco Large Cap Value ETF | 21.38% | 19.65% | 14.48% | 10.36% | -1.16% | 29.50% |
DIVZ Opal Dividend Income ETF | 7.01% | 16.72% | 18.44% | -0.51% | 3.51% | 19.03% |
Correlation
The correlation between PWV and DIVZ is 0.76, which is moderate. They have sometimes moved together and sometimes differently, sharing some price drivers without tracking each other closely.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Focuses on recent behavior, but can change the most. | 0.76 |
Correlation (3Y) Balances recent behavior with more history. | 0.82 |
Correlation (5Y) Shows whether the relationship held over a longer period. | 0.87 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Jan 28, 2021 | 0.87 |
The correlation between PWV and DIVZ shifts across timeframes, from 0.76 (1 year) to 0.87 (all time), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
PWV vs. DIVZ — Risk / Return Rank
PWV
DIVZ
PWV vs. DIVZ - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Invesco Large Cap Value ETF (PWV) and Opal Dividend Income ETF (DIVZ). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.
| PWV | DIVZ | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | +2.33 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | +3.33 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.63 | 1.20 | +0.43 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 8.19 | 1.93 | +6.26 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 29.29 | 4.45 | +24.84 |
Loading charts...
Drawdowns
PWV vs. DIVZ - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum PWV drawdown since its inception was -49.04%, which is greater than DIVZ's maximum drawdown of -15.42%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for PWV and DIVZ.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| PWV | DIVZ | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -49.04% | -15.42% | -33.62% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -4.05% | -5.83% | +1.78% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -14.31% | -8.98% | -5.33% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -16.36% | -15.42% | -0.94% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -37.67% | — | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -1.06% | -2.55% | +1.49% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -9.43% | -3.44% | -5.99% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 1.13% | 2.52% | -1.39% |
Volatility
PWV vs. DIVZ - Volatility Comparison
The current volatility for Invesco Large Cap Value ETF (PWV) is 2.66%, while Opal Dividend Income ETF (DIVZ) has a volatility of 3.33%. This indicates that PWV experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than DIVZ based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| PWV | DIVZ | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 2.66% | 3.33% | -0.67% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 7.25% | 7.80% | -0.55% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 9.63% | 9.99% | -0.36% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 14.28% | 12.66% | +1.62% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 17.14% | 12.55% | +4.59% |
PWV vs. DIVZ - Expense Ratio Comparison
PWV has a 0.55% expense ratio, which is lower than DIVZ's 0.65% expense ratio.
Dividends
PWV vs. DIVZ - Dividend Comparison
PWV's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 1.65%, less than DIVZ's 2.47% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
DIVZ Opal Dividend Income ETF | 2.47% | 2.60% | 2.63% | 3.66% | 3.23% | 3.83% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
PWV Invesco Large Cap Value ETF | 1.65% | 2.12% | 2.08% | 2.16% | 2.29% | 1.89% | 2.66% | 2.24% | 2.34% | 1.55% | 2.35% | 2.42% |
Frequently Asked Questions
PWV and DIVZ have a correlation of 0.76, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
DIVZ has higher volatility (3.33%) compared to PWV (2.66%). In terms of maximum drawdown, PWV dropped -49.04% vs DIVZ's -15.42%.
On 5-year performance, PWV leads with 15.09% vs 9.85% for DIVZ. On fees, PWV is cheaper at 0.55% per year. On volatility, PWV has been the lower-risk option at 2.66%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
Over the 5-year period, PWV has performed better with a 15.09% return vs 9.85%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.
PWV is cheaper with a 0.55% expense ratio, compared with 0.65% for DIVZ.
DIVZ has the higher dividend yield at 2.47%, compared with 1.65% for PWV.
They also come from different issuers: Invesco and TrueShares. Their fees differ too: 0.55% for PWV and 0.65% for DIVZ.
PWV currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (3.45 vs 1.13), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for PWV and DIVZ
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer