PWRZ vs. QBUL
PWRZ (TrueShares Eagle Global Next Gen Power Infrastructure ETF) and QBUL (TrueShares Quarterly Bull Hedge ETF) are both exchange-traded funds - PWRZ is a Infrastructure Equities fund actively managed by TrueShares, while QBUL is a Options Trading fund actively managed by TrueShares. Both are actively managed. Their 0.27 correlation means their historical movements had little consistent relationship. PWRZ charges 0.75%/yr vs 0.79%/yr for QBUL.
Performance
PWRZ vs. QBUL - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
PWRZ
- 1D
- -0.89%
- 1M
- —
- 6M
- —
- YTD
- —
- 1Y
- —
- 3Y*
- —
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
- ALL TIME*
- —
QBUL
- 1D
- -0.11%
- 1M
- -0.32%
- 6M
- 0.86%
- YTD
- 0.85%
- 1Y
- 2.22%
- 3Y*
- —
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
- ALL TIME*
- 3.02%
Liquidity Comparison
| Position | Avg. Volume Value (2W) | Avg. Volume Value (1M) | Avg. Volume Value (3M) |
|---|---|---|---|
| $5.57K | $7.64K | $7.64K | |
| $22.93K | $437.60K | $386.60K |
PWRZ vs. QBUL - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | |
|---|---|
PWRZ TrueShares Eagle Global Next Gen Power Infrastructure ETF | -2.28% |
QBUL TrueShares Quarterly Bull Hedge ETF | -0.48% |
Correlation
The correlation between PWRZ and QBUL is 0.27, which is low. Their historical price movements had little consistent relationship.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Jul 10, 2026 | 0.27 |
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
PWRZ vs. QBUL — Risk / Return Rank
PWRZ
Risk / return metrics aren't available yet — we need at least 12 months of trading data to calculate them.
QBUL
PWRZ vs. QBUL - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for TrueShares Eagle Global Next Gen Power Infrastructure ETF (PWRZ) and TrueShares Quarterly Bull Hedge ETF (QBUL). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.
| PWRZ | QBUL | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | — | — | |
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | — | — | |
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | — | 1.11 | — |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | — | 0.91 | — |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | — | 1.63 | — |
Loading charts...
Drawdowns
PWRZ vs. QBUL - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum PWRZ drawdown since its inception was -3.62%, which is greater than QBUL's maximum drawdown of -2.45%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for PWRZ and QBUL.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| PWRZ | QBUL | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -3.62% | -2.45% | -1.17% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | — | -2.45% | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -3.62% | -1.91% | -1.71% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -1.03% | -1.01% | -0.02% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | — | 1.37% | — |
Volatility
PWRZ vs. QBUL - Volatility Comparison
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| PWRZ | QBUL | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | — | 0.81% | — |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | — | 2.73% | — |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 11.99% | 3.86% | +8.13% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 11.99% | 3.87% | +8.12% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 11.99% | 3.87% | +8.12% |
PWRZ vs. QBUL - Expense Ratio Comparison
PWRZ has a 0.75% expense ratio, which is lower than QBUL's 0.79% expense ratio.
Dividends
PWRZ vs. QBUL - Dividend Comparison
PWRZ has not paid dividends to shareholders, while QBUL's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 8.87%.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 |
|---|---|---|---|
PWRZ TrueShares Eagle Global Next Gen Power Infrastructure ETF | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
QBUL TrueShares Quarterly Bull Hedge ETF | 8.87% | 8.94% | 1.82% |
Frequently Asked Questions
PWRZ and QBUL have a correlation of 0.27, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
On fees, PWRZ is cheaper at 0.75% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
PWRZ is cheaper with a 0.75% expense ratio, compared with 0.79% for QBUL.
QBUL has the higher dividend yield at 8.87%, compared with 0.00% for PWRZ.
PWRZ is categorized as Infrastructure Equities, while QBUL is Options Trading. Their fees differ too: 0.75% for PWRZ and 0.79% for QBUL.
Find the right allocation for PWRZ and QBUL
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer