PWRZ vs. PXJ

Last updated Jul 10, 2026

PWRZ (TrueShares Eagle Global Next Gen Power Infrastructure ETF) and PXJ (Invesco Dynamic Oil & Gas Services ETF) are both Energy Equities funds. PWRZ is actively managed, while PXJ is passively managed. PWRZ charges 0.75%/yr vs 0.63%/yr for PXJ.

Performance

PWRZ vs. PXJ - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in TrueShares Eagle Global Next Gen Power Infrastructure ETF (PWRZ) and Invesco Dynamic Oil & Gas Services ETF (PXJ). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Returns By Period

PWRZ

• 1D: 0.00%
• 1M: —
• 6M: —
• YTD: —
• 1Y: —
• 3Y*: —
• 5Y*: —
• 10Y*: —

PXJ

• 1D: -2.09%
• 1M: -5.99%
• 6M: 25.04%
• YTD: 37.35%
• 1Y: 61.73%
• 3Y*: 17.99%
• 5Y*: 18.45%
• 10Y*: -1.44%

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

PWRZ vs. PXJ - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)
PWRZ TrueShares Eagle Global Next Gen Power Infrastructure ETF	0.00%
PXJ Invesco Dynamic Oil & Gas Services ETF	-2.09%

Return for Risk

PWRZ vs. PXJ — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

PWRZ

Risk / return metrics aren't available yet — we need at least 12 months of trading data to calculate them.

PXJ

PXJ Risk / Return Rank: 83
PXJ Sharpe Ratio Rank: 89
PXJ Sortino Ratio Rank: 85
PXJ Omega Ratio Rank: 79
PXJ Calmar Ratio Rank: 81
PXJ Martin Ratio Rank: 81

The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

PWRZ vs. PXJ - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for TrueShares Eagle Global Next Gen Power Infrastructure ETF (PWRZ) and Invesco Dynamic Oil & Gas Services ETF (PXJ). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.

	PWRZ	PXJ	Difference
Sharpe ratio: Return per unit of total volatility	—	2.32	—
Sortino ratio: Return per unit of downside risk	—	3.03	—
Omega ratio: Gain probability vs. loss probability	—	1.37	—
Calmar ratio: Return relative to maximum drawdown	—	3.37	—
Martin ratio: Return relative to average drawdown	—	12.24	—

Drawdowns

PWRZ vs. PXJ - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum PWRZ drawdown since its inception was 0.00%, smaller than the maximum PXJ drawdown of -94.82%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for PWRZ and PXJ.

Drawdown Indicators

	PWRZ	PXJ	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	0.00%	-94.82%	+94.82%
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	—	-18.39%	—
Max Drawdown (3Y) Largest decline over 3 years	—	-40.03%	—
Max Drawdown (5Y) Largest decline over 5 years	—	-40.03%	—
Max Drawdown (10Y) Largest decline over 10 years	—	-87.72%	—
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	0.00%	-68.61%	+68.61%
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	0.00%	-55.72%	+55.72%
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	—	5.06%	—

Volatility

Volatility by Period

	PWRZ	PXJ	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	—	8.22%	—
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	—	19.30%	—
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	—	26.75%	—
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	—	34.36%	—
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	—	39.23%	—

PWRZ vs. PXJ - Expense Ratio Comparison

PWRZ has a 0.75% expense ratio, which is higher than PXJ's 0.63% expense ratio.

Dividends

PWRZ vs. PXJ - Dividend Comparison

PWRZ has not paid dividends to shareholders, while PXJ's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 2.54%.

Position	TTM	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020	2019	2018	2017	2016	2015
PWRZ TrueShares Eagle Global Next Gen Power Infrastructure ETF	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%
PXJ Invesco Dynamic Oil & Gas Services ETF	2.54%	2.91%	3.34%	1.99%	0.65%	2.40%	4.72%	1.87%	0.99%	2.75%	1.18%	2.36%

Frequently Asked Questions

Which ETF is better, PWRZ or PXJ?

On fees, PXJ is cheaper at 0.63% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Which ETF is cheaper, PWRZ or PXJ?

PXJ is cheaper with a 0.63% expense ratio, compared with 0.75% for PWRZ.

Which ETF pays a higher dividend yield, PWRZ or PXJ?

PXJ has the higher dividend yield at 2.54%, compared with 0.00% for PWRZ.

What is the main difference between PWRZ and PXJ?

They also come from different issuers: TrueShares and Invesco. Their fees differ too: 0.75% for PWRZ and 0.63% for PXJ.