PWRZ vs. FRDM
PWRZ (TrueShares Eagle Global Next Gen Power Infrastructure ETF) and FRDM (Freedom 100 Emerging Markets ETF) are both exchange-traded funds - PWRZ is a Energy Equities fund actively managed by TrueShares, while FRDM is a Emerging Markets Diversified fund tracking the Life + Liberty Freedom 100 Emerging Markets Index. PWRZ is actively managed, while FRDM is passively managed. At a 0.40 correlation, their price movements are largely independent. PWRZ charges 0.75%/yr vs 0.49%/yr for FRDM.
Performance
PWRZ vs. FRDM - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
PWRZ
- 1D
- -0.93%
- 1M
- —
- 6M
- —
- YTD
- —
- 1Y
- —
- 3Y*
- —
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
FRDM
- 1D
- -2.99%
- 1M
- -9.96%
- 6M
- 18.89%
- YTD
- 28.51%
- 1Y
- 65.35%
- 3Y*
- 28.85%
- 5Y*
- 17.22%
- 10Y*
- —
PWRZ vs. FRDM - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | |
|---|---|
PWRZ TrueShares Eagle Global Next Gen Power Infrastructure ETF | -0.37% |
FRDM Freedom 100 Emerging Markets ETF | -6.39% |
Correlation
The correlation between PWRZ and FRDM is 0.40, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Jul 10, 2026 | 0.40 |
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
PWRZ vs. FRDM — Risk / Return Rank
PWRZ
Risk / return metrics aren't available yet — we need at least 12 months of trading data to calculate them.
FRDM
PWRZ vs. FRDM - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for TrueShares Eagle Global Next Gen Power Infrastructure ETF (PWRZ) and Freedom 100 Emerging Markets ETF (FRDM). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.
| PWRZ | FRDM | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | — | — | |
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | — | — | |
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | — | 1.39 | — |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | — | 3.89 | — |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | — | 13.41 | — |
Loading charts...
Drawdowns
PWRZ vs. FRDM - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum PWRZ drawdown since its inception was -1.21%, smaller than the maximum FRDM drawdown of -40.49%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for PWRZ and FRDM.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| PWRZ | FRDM | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -1.21% | -40.49% | +39.28% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | — | -16.87% | — |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | — | -16.87% | — |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | — | -29.25% | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -1.21% | -13.89% | +12.68% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -0.42% | -7.08% | +6.66% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | — | 4.89% | — |
Volatility
PWRZ vs. FRDM - Volatility Comparison
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| PWRZ | FRDM | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | — | 13.07% | — |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | — | 27.60% | — |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 12.75% | 29.63% | -16.88% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 12.75% | 22.11% | -9.36% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 12.75% | 23.49% | -10.74% |
PWRZ vs. FRDM - Expense Ratio Comparison
PWRZ has a 0.75% expense ratio, which is higher than FRDM's 0.49% expense ratio.
Dividends
PWRZ vs. FRDM - Dividend Comparison
PWRZ has not paid dividends to shareholders, while FRDM's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 1.69%.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
FRDM Freedom 100 Emerging Markets ETF | 1.69% | 2.26% | 2.53% | 2.66% | 2.72% | 2.17% | 1.11% | 1.07% |
PWRZ TrueShares Eagle Global Next Gen Power Infrastructure ETF | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
Frequently Asked Questions
PWRZ and FRDM have a correlation of 0.40, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
On fees, FRDM is cheaper at 0.49% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
FRDM is cheaper with a 0.49% expense ratio, compared with 0.75% for PWRZ.
FRDM has the higher dividend yield at 1.69%, compared with 0.00% for PWRZ.
PWRZ is categorized as Energy Equities, while FRDM is Emerging Markets Diversified. They also come from different issuers: TrueShares and Freedom Funds. Their fees differ too: 0.75% for PWRZ and 0.49% for FRDM.
Find the right allocation for PWRZ and FRDM
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer