PWRD vs. SLNZ
Compare and contrast key facts about TCW Transform Systems ETF (PWRD) and TCW Senior Loan ETF (SLNZ).
PWRD and SLNZ are both exchange-traded funds (ETFs), meaning they are traded on stock exchanges and can be bought and sold throughout the day. PWRD is an actively managed fund by TCW. It was launched on Feb 2, 2022. SLNZ is an actively managed fund by TCW. It was launched on Jun 28, 2013.
Performance
PWRD vs. SLNZ - Performance Comparison
Loading graphics...
PWRD vs. SLNZ - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | |
|---|---|---|
PWRD TCW Transform Systems ETF | 3.12% | 7.66% |
SLNZ TCW Senior Loan ETF | -0.97% | 2.79% |
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, PWRD achieves a 3.12% return, which is significantly higher than SLNZ's -0.97% return.
PWRD
- 1D
- 1.43%
- 1M
- -7.98%
- YTD
- 3.12%
- 6M
- 0.56%
- 1Y
- —
- 3Y*
- —
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
SLNZ
- 1D
- 0.32%
- 1M
- 0.51%
- YTD
- -0.97%
- 6M
- 0.18%
- 1Y
- 3.21%
- 3Y*
- —
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
PWRD vs. SLNZ - Expense Ratio Comparison
PWRD has a 0.75% expense ratio, which is higher than SLNZ's 0.65% expense ratio.
Return for Risk
PWRD vs. SLNZ — Risk / Return Rank
PWRD
SLNZ
PWRD vs. SLNZ - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for TCW Transform Systems ETF (PWRD) and TCW Senior Loan ETF (SLNZ). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Risk / return metrics aren't available yet — we need at least 12 months of trading data to calculate them.
Loading graphics...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| PWRD | SLNZ | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | — | 0.68 | — |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 0.63 | 0.87 | -0.24 |
Correlation
The correlation between PWRD and SLNZ is 0.02, which is considered to be low. This implies their price changes are not closely related. A low correlation is generally favorable for portfolio diversification, as it helps to reduce overall risk by spreading it across multiple assets with different performance patterns.
Dividends
PWRD vs. SLNZ - Dividend Comparison
PWRD has not paid dividends to shareholders, while SLNZ's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 7.66%.
| TTM | 2025 | 2024 | |
|---|---|---|---|
PWRD TCW Transform Systems ETF | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
SLNZ TCW Senior Loan ETF | 7.00% | 7.39% | 1.39% |
Drawdowns
PWRD vs. SLNZ - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum PWRD drawdown since its inception was -14.12%, which is greater than SLNZ's maximum drawdown of -2.57%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for PWRD and SLNZ.
Loading graphics...
Drawdown Indicators
| PWRD | SLNZ | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -14.12% | -2.57% | -11.55% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | — | -2.57% | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -9.39% | -1.73% | -7.66% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -3.31% | -0.46% | -2.85% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | — | 0.86% | — |
Volatility
PWRD vs. SLNZ - Volatility Comparison
Loading graphics...
Volatility by Period
| PWRD | SLNZ | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | — | 1.97% | — |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | — | 3.82% | — |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 23.64% | 4.72% | +18.92% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 23.64% | 4.32% | +19.32% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 23.64% | 4.32% | +19.32% |