SLNZ vs. ACLO

Last updated Apr 1, 2026

Compare and contrast key facts about TCW Senior Loan ETF (SLNZ) and TCW AAA CLO ETF (ACLO).

SLNZ and ACLO are both exchange-traded funds (ETFs), meaning they are traded on stock exchanges and can be bought and sold throughout the day. SLNZ is an actively managed fund by TCW. It was launched on Jun 28, 2013. ACLO is an actively managed fund by TCW. It was launched on Nov 15, 2024.

Performance

SLNZ vs. ACLO - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in TCW Senior Loan ETF (SLNZ) and TCW AAA CLO ETF (ACLO). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

SLNZ vs. ACLO - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)	2025	2024
SLNZ TCW Senior Loan ETF	-0.97%	5.21%	0.87%
ACLO TCW AAA CLO ETF	1.06%	5.32%	0.81%

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, SLNZ achieves a -0.97% return, which is significantly lower than ACLO's 1.06% return.

SLNZ

• 1D: 0.32%
• 1M: 0.51%
• YTD: -0.97%
• 6M: 0.18%
• 1Y: 3.21%
• 3Y*: —
• 5Y*: —
• 10Y*: —

ACLO

• 1D: -0.07%
• 1M: 0.28%
• YTD: 1.06%
• 6M: 2.38%
• 1Y: 5.14%
• 3Y*: —
• 5Y*: —
• 10Y*: —

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

SLNZ vs. ACLO - Expense Ratio Comparison

SLNZ has a 0.65% expense ratio, which is higher than ACLO's 0.20% expense ratio.

SLNZ

TCW Senior Loan ETF

ACLO

TCW AAA CLO ETF

Return for Risk

SLNZ vs. ACLO — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

SLNZ

SLNZ Risk / Return Rank: 35
SLNZ Sharpe Ratio Rank: 35
SLNZ Sortino Ratio Rank: 31
SLNZ Omega Ratio Rank: 31
SLNZ Calmar Ratio Rank: 43
SLNZ Martin Ratio Rank: 37

ACLO

ACLO Risk / Return Rank: 98
ACLO Sharpe Ratio Rank: 99
ACLO Sortino Ratio Rank: 99
ACLO Omega Ratio Rank: 99
ACLO Calmar Ratio Rank: 97
ACLO Martin Ratio Rank: 98

The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

SLNZ vs. ACLO - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for TCW Senior Loan ETF (SLNZ) and TCW AAA CLO ETF (ACLO). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

	SLNZ	ACLO	Difference
Sharpe ratio Return per unit of total volatility	0.68	4.59	-3.90
Sortino ratio Return per unit of downside risk	0.94	6.77	-5.83
Omega ratio Gain probability vs. loss probability	1.13	2.40	-1.27
Calmar ratio Return relative to maximum drawdown	1.17	5.31	-4.14
Martin ratio Return relative to average drawdown	3.48	32.12	-28.64
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month.

SLNZ vs. ACLO - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current SLNZ Sharpe Ratio is 0.68, which is lower than the ACLO Sharpe Ratio of 4.59. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of SLNZ and ACLO, offering insights into how both investments have performed under varying market conditions. These values are calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months.

Sharpe Ratios by Period

	SLNZ	ACLO	Difference
Sharpe Ratio (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	0.68	4.59	-3.90
Sharpe Ratio (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history	0.87	4.75	-3.88

Correlation

The correlation between SLNZ and ACLO is 0.02, which is considered to be low. This implies their price changes are not closely related. A low correlation is generally favorable for portfolio diversification, as it helps to reduce overall risk by spreading it across multiple assets with different performance patterns.

Dividends

SLNZ vs. ACLO - Dividend Comparison

SLNZ's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 7.66%, more than ACLO's 4.84% yield.

	TTM	2025	2024
SLNZ TCW Senior Loan ETF	7.66%	7.39%	1.39%
ACLO TCW AAA CLO ETF	4.84%	4.87%	0.59%

Drawdowns

SLNZ vs. ACLO - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum SLNZ drawdown since its inception was -2.57%, which is greater than ACLO's maximum drawdown of -1.01%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for SLNZ and ACLO.

Drawdown Indicators

	SLNZ	ACLO	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	-2.57%	-1.01%	-1.56%
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	-2.57%	-0.91%	-1.66%
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	-1.73%	-0.07%	-1.66%
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	-0.46%	-0.05%	-0.41%
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	0.86%	0.17%	+0.69%

Volatility

SLNZ vs. ACLO - Volatility Comparison

TCW Senior Loan ETF (SLNZ) has a higher volatility of 1.97% compared to TCW AAA CLO ETF (ACLO) at 0.39%. This indicates that SLNZ's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than ACLO based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.

Volatility by Period

	SLNZ	ACLO	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	1.97%	0.39%	+1.58%
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	3.82%	0.58%	+3.24%
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	4.72%	1.14%	+3.58%
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	4.32%	1.13%	+3.19%
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	4.32%	1.13%	+3.19%