PWRD vs. EIPX
PWRD (TCW Transform Systems ETF) and EIPX (FT Energy Income Partners Strategy ETF) are both Energy Equities funds. Both are actively managed. At a 0.21 correlation, their price movements are largely independent. PWRD charges 0.75%/yr vs 0.95%/yr for EIPX.
Performance
PWRD vs. EIPX - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, PWRD achieves a 19.81% return, which is significantly lower than EIPX's 21.96% return.
PWRD
- 1D
- -0.09%
- 1M
- 3.10%
- YTD
- 19.81%
- 6M
- 18.04%
- 1Y
- —
- 3Y*
- —
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
EIPX
- 1D
- 0.19%
- 1M
- -2.12%
- YTD
- 21.96%
- 6M
- 19.46%
- 1Y
- 30.04%
- 3Y*
- 21.12%
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
PWRD vs. EIPX - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | |
|---|---|---|
PWRD TCW Transform Systems ETF | 19.81% | 7.66% |
EIPX FT Energy Income Partners Strategy ETF | 21.96% | 4.62% |
Correlation
The correlation between PWRD and EIPX is 0.21, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Jun 30, 2025 | 0.21 |
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
PWRD vs. EIPX — Risk / Return Rank
PWRD
EIPX
PWRD vs. EIPX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for TCW Transform Systems ETF (PWRD) and FT Energy Income Partners Strategy ETF (EIPX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Risk / return metrics aren't available yet — we need at least 12 months of trading data to calculate them.
Loading charts...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| PWRD | EIPX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | — | 2.71 | — |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 1.32 | 1.20 | +0.12 |
Drawdowns
PWRD vs. EIPX - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum PWRD drawdown since its inception was -14.12%, smaller than the maximum EIPX drawdown of -15.43%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for PWRD and EIPX.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| PWRD | EIPX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -14.12% | -15.43% | +1.31% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | — | -4.12% | — |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | — | -15.43% | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -0.74% | -2.58% | +1.84% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -3.17% | -2.27% | -0.90% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | — | 1.49% | — |
Volatility
PWRD vs. EIPX - Volatility Comparison
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| PWRD | EIPX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | — | 4.01% | — |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | — | 8.50% | — |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 24.03% | 11.17% | +12.86% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 24.03% | 15.06% | +8.97% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 24.03% | 15.06% | +8.97% |
PWRD vs. EIPX - Expense Ratio Comparison
PWRD has a 0.75% expense ratio, which is lower than EIPX's 0.95% expense ratio.
Dividends
PWRD vs. EIPX - Dividend Comparison
PWRD has not paid dividends to shareholders, while EIPX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 2.68%.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
EIPX FT Energy Income Partners Strategy ETF | 2.68% | 3.23% | 3.27% | 3.48% | 0.34% |
PWRD TCW Transform Systems ETF | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
Frequently Asked Questions
PWRD and EIPX have a correlation of 0.21, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
On fees, PWRD is cheaper at 0.75% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
PWRD is cheaper with a 0.75% expense ratio, compared with 0.95% for EIPX.
EIPX has the higher dividend yield at 2.68%, compared with 0.00% for PWRD.
They also come from different issuers: TCW and First Trust. Their fees differ too: 0.75% for PWRD and 0.95% for EIPX.
Find the right allocation for PWRD and EIPX
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer