PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
PWRD vs. EIPX
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

PWRD vs. EIPX - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in TCW Transform Systems ETF (PWRD) and FT Energy Income Partners Strategy ETF (EIPX). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, PWRD achieves a 19.81% return, which is significantly lower than EIPX's 21.96% return.


PWRD

1D
-0.09%
1M
3.10%
YTD
19.81%
6M
18.04%
1Y
3Y*
5Y*
10Y*

EIPX

1D
0.19%
1M
-2.12%
YTD
21.96%
6M
19.46%
1Y
30.04%
3Y*
21.12%
5Y*
10Y*
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

PWRD vs. EIPX - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)2025
PWRD
TCW Transform Systems ETF
19.81%7.66%
EIPX
FT Energy Income Partners Strategy ETF
21.96%4.62%

Correlation

The correlation between PWRD and EIPX is 0.21, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.


Correlation
Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Jun 30, 2025

0.21

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

PWRD vs. EIPX — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

PWRD

EIPX
EIPX Risk / Return Rank: 8686
Overall Rank
EIPX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 8383
Sharpe Ratio Rank
EIPX Sortino Ratio Rank: 8585
Sortino Ratio Rank
EIPX Omega Ratio Rank: 7777
Omega Ratio Rank
EIPX Calmar Ratio Rank: 9494
Calmar Ratio Rank
EIPX Martin Ratio Rank: 8989
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

PWRD vs. EIPX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for TCW Transform Systems ETF (PWRD) and FT Energy Income Partners Strategy ETF (EIPX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


Risk / return metrics aren't available yet — we need at least 12 months of trading data to calculate them.

PWRD vs. EIPX - Sharpe Ratio Comparison


Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


PWRDEIPXDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

2.71

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

1.32

1.20

+0.12

Drawdowns

PWRD vs. EIPX - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum PWRD drawdown since its inception was -14.12%, smaller than the maximum EIPX drawdown of -15.43%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for PWRD and EIPX.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


PWRDEIPXDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-14.12%

-15.43%

+1.31%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-4.12%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-15.43%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-0.74%

-2.58%

+1.84%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-3.17%

-2.27%

-0.90%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

1.49%

Volatility

PWRD vs. EIPX - Volatility Comparison


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


PWRDEIPXDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

4.01%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

8.50%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

24.03%

11.17%

+12.86%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

24.03%

15.06%

+8.97%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

24.03%

15.06%

+8.97%

PWRD vs. EIPX - Expense Ratio Comparison

PWRD has a 0.75% expense ratio, which is lower than EIPX's 0.95% expense ratio.


Dividends

PWRD vs. EIPX - Dividend Comparison

PWRD has not paid dividends to shareholders, while EIPX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 2.68%.


PositionTTM2025202420232022
EIPX
FT Energy Income Partners Strategy ETF
2.68%3.23%3.27%3.48%0.34%
PWRD
TCW Transform Systems ETF
0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%

Frequently Asked Questions


PWRD and EIPX have a correlation of 0.21, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

On fees, PWRD is cheaper at 0.75% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

PWRD is cheaper with a 0.75% expense ratio, compared with 0.95% for EIPX.

EIPX has the higher dividend yield at 2.68%, compared with 0.00% for PWRD.

They also come from different issuers: TCW and First Trust. Their fees differ too: 0.75% for PWRD and 0.95% for EIPX.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for PWRD and EIPX

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer