PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
PWR vs. SAP
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends
Financials

Performance

PWR vs. SAP - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Quanta Services, Inc. (PWR) and SAP SE (SAP). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, PWR achieves a 67.76% return, which is significantly higher than SAP's -31.24% return. Over the past 10 years, PWR has outperformed SAP with an annualized return of 41.17%, while SAP has yielded a comparatively lower 9.59% annualized return.


PWR

1D
3.58%
1M
-8.53%
YTD
67.76%
6M
61.62%
1Y
97.52%
3Y*
56.60%
5Y*
50.60%
10Y*
41.17%

SAP

1D
0.33%
1M
2.09%
YTD
-31.24%
6M
-31.78%
1Y
-44.64%
3Y*
8.04%
5Y*
4.34%
10Y*
9.59%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

PWR vs. SAP - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
PWR
Quanta Services, Inc.
67.76%33.70%46.60%51.70%24.63%59.50%77.74%35.84%-22.93%12.22%
SAP
SAP SE
-31.24%-0.48%61.27%52.30%-24.64%9.22%-1.28%36.43%-10.04%31.25%

Correlation

The correlation between PWR and SAP is 0.00, meaning there is essentially no relationship between their price movements. Each responds to its own set of market drivers, making them strong candidates for combining in a diversified portfolio.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.00

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.24

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.29

Correlation (10Y)
Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.31

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Aug 7, 1998

0.35

Over the past year, the correlation between PWR and SAP has dropped to 0.00 - well below their long-term average of 0.35, suggesting their price drivers have been diverging.

Fundamentals

Market Cap

PWR:

$107.64B

SAP:

$191.76B

EPS

PWR:

$7.29

SAP:

€6.13

PE Ratio

PWR:

97.08

SAP:

23.16

PEG Ratio

PWR:

4.81

SAP:

0.49

PS Ratio

PWR:

3.58

SAP:

4.46

PB Ratio

PWR:

11.90

SAP:

3.70

Total Revenue (TTM)

PWR:

$29.99B

SAP:

€37.34B

Gross Profit (TTM)

PWR:

$4.08B

SAP:

€27.51B

EBITDA (TTM)

PWR:

$2.40B

SAP:

€12.97B

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

PWR vs. SAP — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

PWR
PWR Risk / Return Rank: 9393
Overall Rank
PWR Sharpe Ratio Rank: 9494
Sharpe Ratio Rank
PWR Sortino Ratio Rank: 9292
Sortino Ratio Rank
PWR Omega Ratio Rank: 9292
Omega Ratio Rank
PWR Calmar Ratio Rank: 9494
Calmar Ratio Rank
PWR Martin Ratio Rank: 9595
Martin Ratio Rank

SAP
SAP Risk / Return Rank: 33
Overall Rank
SAP Sharpe Ratio Rank: 11
Sharpe Ratio Rank
SAP Sortino Ratio Rank: 33
Sortino Ratio Rank
SAP Omega Ratio Rank: 33
Omega Ratio Rank
SAP Calmar Ratio Rank: 55
Calmar Ratio Rank
SAP Martin Ratio Rank: 55
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

PWR vs. SAP - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Quanta Services, Inc. (PWR) and SAP SE (SAP). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.


PWRSAPDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

+3.95

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

+5.24

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.44

0.75

+0.69

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

5.73

-0.94

+6.67

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

18.09

-1.58

+19.67

PWR vs. SAP - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current PWR Sharpe Ratio is 2.64, which is higher than the SAP Sharpe Ratio of -1.31. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of PWR and SAP, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Drawdowns

PWR vs. SAP - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum PWR drawdown since its inception was -97.07%, which is greater than SAP's maximum drawdown of -87.91%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for PWR and SAP.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


PWRSAPDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-97.07%

-87.91%

-9.16%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-17.11%

-47.71%

+30.60%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-33.89%

-47.71%

+13.82%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-33.89%

-47.71%

+13.82%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-45.53%

-51.31%

+5.78%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-9.87%

-46.45%

+36.58%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-46.84%

-28.24%

-18.60%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

5.41%

28.29%

-22.88%

Volatility

PWR vs. SAP - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for Quanta Services, Inc. (PWR) is 13.07%, while SAP SE (SAP) has a volatility of 14.54%. This indicates that PWR experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than SAP based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


PWRSAPDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

13.07%

14.54%

-1.47%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

30.74%

30.61%

+0.13%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

37.12%

34.27%

+2.85%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

35.79%

28.76%

+7.03%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

33.78%

28.37%

+5.41%

Dividends

PWR vs. SAP - Dividend Comparison

PWR's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.06%, less than SAP's 1.78% yield.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
PWR
Quanta Services, Inc.
0.06%0.09%0.09%0.15%0.25%0.16%0.29%0.42%0.13%0.00%0.00%0.00%
SAP
SAP SE
1.78%1.05%0.97%1.41%2.05%1.56%1.31%1.27%1.73%0.87%1.08%1.11%

Financials

PWR vs. SAP - Financials Comparison

This section allows you to compare key financial metrics between Quanta Services, Inc. and SAP SE. You can select fields from income statements, balance sheets, and cash flow statements to easily visualize and compare the financial health of both companies.


Quarterly
Annual

Total Revenue: Total amount of money received from sales and other business activities


2.00B4.00B6.00B8.00B10.00B20222023202420252026
7.87B
9.56B
(PWR) Total Revenue
(SAP) Total Revenue
Please note, different currencies. PWR values in USD, SAP values in EUR

PWR vs. SAP - Profitability Comparison

The chart below illustrates the profitability comparison between Quanta Services, Inc. and SAP SE over time, highlighting three key metrics: Gross Profit Margin, Operating Margin, and Net Profit Margin.

Gross Margin
Operating Margin
Net Margin
Quarterly
Annual

10.0%20.0%30.0%40.0%50.0%60.0%70.0%20222023202420252026
14.1%
73.0%
Portfolio components
PWR - Gross Margin

Gross margin is calculated as gross profit divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Quanta Services, Inc. reported a gross profit of 1.11B and revenue of 7.87B. Therefore, the gross margin over that period was 14.1%.

SAP - Gross Margin

Gross margin is calculated as gross profit divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, SAP SE reported a gross profit of 6.97B and revenue of 9.56B. Therefore, the gross margin over that period was 73.0%.

PWR - Operating Margin

Operating margin is calculated as operating income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Quanta Services, Inc. reported an operating income of 338.78M and revenue of 7.87B, resulting in an operating margin of 4.3%.

SAP - Operating Margin

Operating margin is calculated as operating income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, SAP SE reported an operating income of 2.75B and revenue of 9.56B, resulting in an operating margin of 28.8%.

PWR - Net Margin

Net margin is calculated as net income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Quanta Services, Inc. reported a net income of 220.63M and revenue of 7.87B, resulting in a net margin of 2.8%.

SAP - Net Margin

Net margin is calculated as net income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, SAP SE reported a net income of 1.93B and revenue of 9.56B, resulting in a net margin of 20.2%.


Frequently Asked Questions


PWR and SAP have a correlation of 0.00, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

SAP has higher volatility (14.54%) compared to PWR (13.07%). In terms of maximum drawdown, PWR dropped -97.07% vs SAP's -87.91%.

PWR currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.64 vs -1.31), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for PWR and SAP

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer