PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
PWR vs. OLA.TO
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends
Financials

Performance

PWR vs. OLA.TO - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Quanta Services, Inc. (PWR) and Orla Mining Ltd. (OLA.TO). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Different Trading Currencies

PWR is traded in USD, while OLA.TO is traded in CAD. To make them comparable, the OLA.TO values have been converted to USD using the latest available exchange rates.

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, PWR achieves a 67.76% return, which is significantly higher than OLA.TO's -20.79% return.


PWR

1D
3.58%
1M
-8.53%
YTD
67.76%
6M
61.62%
1Y
97.52%
3Y*
56.60%
5Y*
50.60%
10Y*
41.17%

OLA.TO

1D
2.89%
1M
-26.70%
YTD
-20.79%
6M
-18.29%
1Y
-2.73%
3Y*
38.94%
5Y*
18.27%
10Y*
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

PWR vs. OLA.TO - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
PWR
Quanta Services, Inc.
67.76%33.70%46.60%51.70%24.63%59.50%77.74%35.84%-22.93%8.13%
OLA.TO
Orla Mining Ltd.
-20.79%143.00%69.88%-19.25%6.70%-29.56%251.34%98.66%-45.59%37.94%

Correlation

The correlation between PWR and OLA.TO is 0.21, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.21

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.21

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.17

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Feb 9, 2017

0.12

Fundamentals

Market Cap

PWR:

$107.64B

OLA.TO:

CA$5.95B

EPS

PWR:

$7.29

OLA.TO:

CA$0.82

PE Ratio

PWR:

97.08

OLA.TO:

18.13

PEG Ratio

PWR:

4.81

OLA.TO:

0.29

PS Ratio

PWR:

3.58

OLA.TO:

3.56

PB Ratio

PWR:

11.90

OLA.TO:

5.64

Total Revenue (TTM)

PWR:

$29.99B

OLA.TO:

CA$1.59B

Gross Profit (TTM)

PWR:

$4.08B

OLA.TO:

CA$848.41M

EBITDA (TTM)

PWR:

$2.40B

OLA.TO:

CA$966.01M

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

PWR vs. OLA.TO — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

PWR
PWR Risk / Return Rank: 9393
Overall Rank
PWR Sharpe Ratio Rank: 9494
Sharpe Ratio Rank
PWR Sortino Ratio Rank: 9292
Sortino Ratio Rank
PWR Omega Ratio Rank: 9292
Omega Ratio Rank
PWR Calmar Ratio Rank: 9494
Calmar Ratio Rank
PWR Martin Ratio Rank: 9595
Martin Ratio Rank

OLA.TO
OLA.TO Risk / Return Rank: 4343
Overall Rank
OLA.TO Sharpe Ratio Rank: 4242
Sharpe Ratio Rank
OLA.TO Sortino Ratio Rank: 4444
Sortino Ratio Rank
OLA.TO Omega Ratio Rank: 4444
Omega Ratio Rank
OLA.TO Calmar Ratio Rank: 4242
Calmar Ratio Rank
OLA.TO Martin Ratio Rank: 4242
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

PWR vs. OLA.TO - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Quanta Services, Inc. (PWR) and Orla Mining Ltd. (OLA.TO). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.


PWROLA.TODifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

+2.68

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

+2.85

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.44

1.06

+0.38

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

5.73

-0.05

+5.78

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

18.09

-0.13

+18.21

PWR vs. OLA.TO - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current PWR Sharpe Ratio is 2.64, which is higher than the OLA.TO Sharpe Ratio of -0.04. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of PWR and OLA.TO, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Drawdowns

PWR vs. OLA.TO - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum PWR drawdown since its inception was -97.07%, which is greater than OLA.TO's maximum drawdown of -57.88%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for PWR and OLA.TO.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


PWROLA.TODifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-97.07%

-57.88%

-39.19%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-17.11%

-54.91%

+37.80%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-33.89%

-54.91%

+21.02%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-33.89%

-54.91%

+21.02%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-45.53%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-9.87%

-50.87%

+41.00%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-46.84%

-23.16%

-23.68%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

5.41%

21.68%

-16.27%

Volatility

PWR vs. OLA.TO - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for Quanta Services, Inc. (PWR) is 13.07%, while Orla Mining Ltd. (OLA.TO) has a volatility of 23.07%. This indicates that PWR experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than OLA.TO based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


PWROLA.TODifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

13.07%

23.07%

-10.00%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

30.74%

51.52%

-20.78%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

37.12%

73.18%

-36.06%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

35.79%

58.92%

-23.13%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

33.78%

57.20%

-23.42%

Dividends

PWR vs. OLA.TO - Dividend Comparison

PWR's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.06%, less than OLA.TO's 0.28% yield.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018
OLA.TO
Orla Mining Ltd.
0.28%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%
PWR
Quanta Services, Inc.
0.06%0.09%0.09%0.15%0.25%0.16%0.29%0.42%0.13%

Financials

PWR vs. OLA.TO - Financials Comparison

This section allows you to compare key financial metrics between Quanta Services, Inc. and Orla Mining Ltd.. You can select fields from income statements, balance sheets, and cash flow statements to easily visualize and compare the financial health of both companies.


Quarterly
Annual

Total Revenue: Total amount of money received from sales and other business activities


0.002.00B4.00B6.00B8.00B20222023202420252026
7.87B
519.71M
(PWR) Total Revenue
(OLA.TO) Total Revenue
Please note, different currencies. PWR values in USD, OLA.TO values in CAD

PWR vs. OLA.TO - Profitability Comparison

The chart below illustrates the profitability comparison between Quanta Services, Inc. and Orla Mining Ltd. over time, highlighting three key metrics: Gross Profit Margin, Operating Margin, and Net Profit Margin.

Gross Margin
Operating Margin
Net Margin
Quarterly
Annual

0.0%20.0%40.0%60.0%20222023202420252026
14.1%
57.0%
Portfolio components
PWR - Gross Margin

Gross margin is calculated as gross profit divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Quanta Services, Inc. reported a gross profit of 1.11B and revenue of 7.87B. Therefore, the gross margin over that period was 14.1%.

OLA.TO - Gross Margin

Gross margin is calculated as gross profit divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Orla Mining Ltd. reported a gross profit of 296.32M and revenue of 519.71M. Therefore, the gross margin over that period was 57.0%.

PWR - Operating Margin

Operating margin is calculated as operating income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Quanta Services, Inc. reported an operating income of 338.78M and revenue of 7.87B, resulting in an operating margin of 4.3%.

OLA.TO - Operating Margin

Operating margin is calculated as operating income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Orla Mining Ltd. reported an operating income of 274.55M and revenue of 519.71M, resulting in an operating margin of 52.8%.

PWR - Net Margin

Net margin is calculated as net income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Quanta Services, Inc. reported a net income of 220.63M and revenue of 7.87B, resulting in a net margin of 2.8%.

OLA.TO - Net Margin

Net margin is calculated as net income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Orla Mining Ltd. reported a net income of 103.43M and revenue of 519.71M, resulting in a net margin of 19.9%.


Frequently Asked Questions


PWR and OLA.TO have a correlation of 0.21, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for PWR and OLA.TO

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer