PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
PWR vs. LRN
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends
Financials

Performance

PWR vs. LRN - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Quanta Services, Inc. (PWR) and Stride, Inc. (LRN). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, PWR achieves a 67.76% return, which is significantly higher than LRN's 50.49% return. Over the past 10 years, PWR has outperformed LRN with an annualized return of 41.17%, while LRN has yielded a comparatively lower 23.80% annualized return.


PWR

1D
3.58%
1M
-8.53%
YTD
67.76%
6M
61.62%
1Y
97.52%
3Y*
56.60%
5Y*
50.60%
10Y*
41.17%

LRN

1D
-1.77%
1M
10.87%
YTD
50.49%
6M
51.49%
1Y
-31.17%
3Y*
33.90%
5Y*
26.27%
10Y*
23.80%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

PWR vs. LRN - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
PWR
Quanta Services, Inc.
67.76%33.70%46.60%51.70%24.63%59.50%77.74%35.84%-22.93%12.22%
LRN
Stride, Inc.
50.49%-37.53%75.05%89.80%-6.15%56.99%4.32%-17.91%55.91%-7.34%

Correlation

The correlation between PWR and LRN is 0.05, meaning there is essentially no relationship between their price movements. Each responds to its own set of market drivers, making them strong candidates for combining in a diversified portfolio.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.05

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.20

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.23

Correlation (10Y)
Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.23

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Dec 13, 2007

0.28

Over the past year, the correlation between PWR and LRN has dropped to 0.05 - well below their long-term average of 0.28, suggesting their price drivers have been diverging.

Fundamentals

Market Cap

PWR:

$107.64B

LRN:

$4.65B

EPS

PWR:

$7.29

LRN:

$9.68

PE Ratio

PWR:

97.08

LRN:

10.10

PEG Ratio

PWR:

4.81

LRN:

0.25

PS Ratio

PWR:

3.58

LRN:

1.86

PB Ratio

PWR:

11.90

LRN:

2.83

Total Revenue (TTM)

PWR:

$29.99B

LRN:

$2.54B

Gross Profit (TTM)

PWR:

$4.08B

LRN:

$972.24M

EBITDA (TTM)

PWR:

$2.40B

LRN:

$424.60M

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

PWR vs. LRN — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

PWR
PWR Risk / Return Rank: 9393
Overall Rank
PWR Sharpe Ratio Rank: 9494
Sharpe Ratio Rank
PWR Sortino Ratio Rank: 9292
Sortino Ratio Rank
PWR Omega Ratio Rank: 9292
Omega Ratio Rank
PWR Calmar Ratio Rank: 9494
Calmar Ratio Rank
PWR Martin Ratio Rank: 9595
Martin Ratio Rank

LRN
LRN Risk / Return Rank: 2727
Overall Rank
LRN Sharpe Ratio Rank: 2222
Sharpe Ratio Rank
LRN Sortino Ratio Rank: 3030
Sortino Ratio Rank
LRN Omega Ratio Rank: 2727
Omega Ratio Rank
LRN Calmar Ratio Rank: 2626
Calmar Ratio Rank
LRN Martin Ratio Rank: 2929
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

PWR vs. LRN - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Quanta Services, Inc. (PWR) and Stride, Inc. (LRN). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.


PWRLRNDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

+3.11

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

+3.42

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.44

0.97

+0.47

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

5.73

-0.49

+6.22

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

18.09

-0.74

+18.83

PWR vs. LRN - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current PWR Sharpe Ratio is 2.64, which is higher than the LRN Sharpe Ratio of -0.47. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of PWR and LRN, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Drawdowns

PWR vs. LRN - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum PWR drawdown since its inception was -97.07%, which is greater than LRN's maximum drawdown of -81.41%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for PWR and LRN.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


PWRLRNDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-97.07%

-81.41%

-15.66%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-17.11%

-64.07%

+46.96%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-33.89%

-64.07%

+30.18%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-33.89%

-64.07%

+30.18%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-45.53%

-64.07%

+18.54%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-9.87%

-42.46%

+32.59%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-46.84%

-36.27%

-10.57%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

5.41%

42.11%

-36.70%

Volatility

PWR vs. LRN - Volatility Comparison

Quanta Services, Inc. (PWR) has a higher volatility of 13.07% compared to Stride, Inc. (LRN) at 8.21%. This indicates that PWR's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than LRN based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


PWRLRNDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

13.07%

8.21%

+4.86%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

30.74%

24.17%

+6.57%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

37.12%

66.70%

-29.58%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

35.79%

51.40%

-15.61%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

33.78%

49.22%

-15.44%

Dividends

PWR vs. LRN - Dividend Comparison

PWR's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.06%, while LRN has not paid dividends to shareholders.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018
LRN
Stride, Inc.
0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%
PWR
Quanta Services, Inc.
0.06%0.09%0.09%0.15%0.25%0.16%0.29%0.42%0.13%

Financials

PWR vs. LRN - Financials Comparison

This section allows you to compare key financial metrics between Quanta Services, Inc. and Stride, Inc.. You can select fields from income statements, balance sheets, and cash flow statements to easily visualize and compare the financial health of both companies.


Quarterly
Annual

Total Revenue: Total amount of money received from sales and other business activities


0.002.00B4.00B6.00B8.00B20222023202420252026
7.87B
629.87M
(PWR) Total Revenue
(LRN) Total Revenue
Values in USD except per share items

PWR vs. LRN - Profitability Comparison

The chart below illustrates the profitability comparison between Quanta Services, Inc. and Stride, Inc. over time, highlighting three key metrics: Gross Profit Margin, Operating Margin, and Net Profit Margin.

Gross Margin
Operating Margin
Net Margin
Quarterly
Annual

10.0%15.0%20.0%25.0%30.0%35.0%40.0%45.0%20222023202420252026
14.1%
36.8%
Portfolio components
PWR - Gross Margin

Gross margin is calculated as gross profit divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Quanta Services, Inc. reported a gross profit of 1.11B and revenue of 7.87B. Therefore, the gross margin over that period was 14.1%.

LRN - Gross Margin

Gross margin is calculated as gross profit divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Stride, Inc. reported a gross profit of 231.56M and revenue of 629.87M. Therefore, the gross margin over that period was 36.8%.

PWR - Operating Margin

Operating margin is calculated as operating income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Quanta Services, Inc. reported an operating income of 338.78M and revenue of 7.87B, resulting in an operating margin of 4.3%.

LRN - Operating Margin

Operating margin is calculated as operating income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Stride, Inc. reported an operating income of 129.08M and revenue of 629.87M, resulting in an operating margin of 20.5%.

PWR - Net Margin

Net margin is calculated as net income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Quanta Services, Inc. reported a net income of 220.63M and revenue of 7.87B, resulting in a net margin of 2.8%.

LRN - Net Margin

Net margin is calculated as net income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Stride, Inc. reported a net income of 248.49M and revenue of 629.87M, resulting in a net margin of 39.5%.


Frequently Asked Questions


PWR and LRN have a correlation of 0.05, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

PWR has higher volatility (13.07%) compared to LRN (8.21%). In terms of maximum drawdown, PWR dropped -97.07% vs LRN's -81.41%.

PWR currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.64 vs -0.47), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for PWR and LRN

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer