PWR vs. INFA
PWR (Quanta Services, Inc.) and INFA (Informatica Inc.) are both stocks.
Performance
PWR vs. INFA - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
PWR
- 1D
- -0.19%
- 1M
- -6.87%
- YTD
- 64.46%
- 6M
- 49.89%
- 1Y
- 92.19%
- 3Y*
- 56.18%
- 5Y*
- 49.77%
- 10Y*
- 40.58%
INFA
- 1D
- 0.00%
- 1M
- —
- YTD
- —
- 6M
- —
- 1Y
- —
- 3Y*
- —
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
PWR vs. INFA - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | |
|---|---|
PWR Quanta Services, Inc. | -4.97% |
INFA Informatica Inc. | 0.00% |
Fundamentals
PWR:
$105.52B
INFA:
$7.70B
PWR:
$7.29
INFA:
$0.03
PWR:
95.17
INFA:
727.98
PWR:
3.51
INFA:
4.53
PWR:
11.67
INFA:
3.14
PWR:
$29.99B
INFA:
$1.68B
PWR:
$4.08B
INFA:
$1.36B
PWR:
$2.40B
INFA:
$323.83M
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
PWR vs. INFA — Risk / Return Rank
PWR
INFA
PWR vs. INFA - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Quanta Services, Inc. (PWR) and Informatica Inc. (INFA). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| PWR | INFA | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | — | — | |
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | — | — | |
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.43 | — | — |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 7.45 | — | — |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 17.97 | — | — |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading charts...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| PWR | INFA | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 2.55 | — | — |
Sharpe Ratio (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 1.41 | — | — |
Sharpe Ratio (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | 1.21 | — | — |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 0.35 | — | — |
Drawdowns
PWR vs. INFA - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum PWR drawdown since its inception was -97.07%, which is greater than INFA's maximum drawdown of 0.00%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for PWR and INFA.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| PWR | INFA | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -97.07% | 0.00% | -97.07% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -12.45% | — | — |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -33.89% | — | — |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -33.89% | — | — |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -45.53% | — | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -11.64% | 0.00% | -11.64% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -46.86% | 0.00% | -46.86% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 5.15% | — | — |
Volatility
PWR vs. INFA - Volatility Comparison
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| PWR | INFA | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 11.16% | — | — |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 29.60% | — | — |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 36.37% | 0.00% | +36.37% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 35.62% | 0.00% | +35.62% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 33.70% | 0.00% | +33.70% |
Dividends
PWR vs. INFA - Dividend Comparison
PWR's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.06%, while INFA has not paid dividends to shareholders.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
INFA Informatica Inc. | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
PWR Quanta Services, Inc. | 0.06% | 0.09% | 0.09% | 0.15% | 0.25% | 0.16% | 0.29% | 0.42% | 0.13% |
Financials
PWR vs. INFA - Financials Comparison
This section allows you to compare key financial metrics between Quanta Services, Inc. and Informatica Inc.. You can select fields from income statements, balance sheets, and cash flow statements to easily visualize and compare the financial health of both companies.
Total Revenue: Total amount of money received from sales and other business activities
PWR vs. INFA - Profitability Comparison
PWR - Gross Margin
Gross margin is calculated as gross profit divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Quanta Services, Inc. reported a gross profit of 1.11B and revenue of 7.87B. Therefore, the gross margin over that period was 14.1%.
INFA - Gross Margin
Gross margin is calculated as gross profit divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Informatica Inc. reported a gross profit of 358.74M and revenue of 439.16M. Therefore, the gross margin over that period was 81.7%.
PWR - Operating Margin
Operating margin is calculated as operating income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Quanta Services, Inc. reported an operating income of 338.78M and revenue of 7.87B, resulting in an operating margin of 4.3%.
INFA - Operating Margin
Operating margin is calculated as operating income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Informatica Inc. reported an operating income of 60.87M and revenue of 439.16M, resulting in an operating margin of 13.9%.
PWR - Net Margin
Net margin is calculated as net income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Quanta Services, Inc. reported a net income of 220.63M and revenue of 7.87B, resulting in a net margin of 2.8%.
INFA - Net Margin
Net margin is calculated as net income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Informatica Inc. reported a net income of 4.00M and revenue of 439.16M, resulting in a net margin of 0.9%.
Find the right allocation for PWR and INFA
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer