PortfoliosLab logo
PortfoliosLab logo
Tools
Performance Analysis
Portfolio Analysis
Factor Model
Portfolios
Lazy PortfoliosUser Portfolios
Discussions
INFA vs. CFLT
Performance
Risk-Adjusted Performance
Dividends
Drawdowns
Volatility
Financials

Correlation

The correlation between INFA and CFLT is 0.57, which is considered to be moderate. This suggests that the two assets have some degree of positive relationship in their price movements. Moderate correlation can be acceptable for portfolio diversification, offering a balance between risk and potential returns.


-0.50.00.51.00.6

Performance

INFA vs. CFLT - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Informatica Inc. (INFA) and Confluent, Inc. (CFLT). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

-20.00%-10.00%0.00%10.00%20.00%30.00%40.00%AugustSeptemberOctoberNovemberDecember2025
2.43%
17.70%
INFA
CFLT

Key characteristics

Sharpe Ratio

INFA:

-0.46

CFLT:

0.49

Sortino Ratio

INFA:

-0.46

CFLT:

1.24

Omega Ratio

INFA:

0.94

CFLT:

1.16

Calmar Ratio

INFA:

-0.40

CFLT:

0.37

Martin Ratio

INFA:

-0.59

CFLT:

1.22

Ulcer Index

INFA:

27.67%

CFLT:

24.59%

Daily Std Dev

INFA:

35.39%

CFLT:

61.61%

Max Drawdown

INFA:

-63.71%

CFLT:

-82.61%

Current Drawdown

INFA:

-35.72%

CFLT:

-69.09%

Fundamentals

Market Cap

INFA:

$7.62B

CFLT:

$9.49B

EPS

INFA:

$0.23

CFLT:

-$1.10

Total Revenue (TTM)

INFA:

$1.21B

CFLT:

$702.42M

Gross Profit (TTM)

INFA:

$872.01M

CFLT:

$512.56M

EBITDA (TTM)

INFA:

$205.09M

CFLT:

-$297.51M

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, INFA achieves a -3.74% return, which is significantly lower than CFLT's 3.47% return.


INFA

YTD

-3.74%

1M

-4.81%

6M

2.42%

1Y

-17.13%

5Y*

N/A

10Y*

N/A

CFLT

YTD

3.47%

1M

0.14%

6M

17.70%

1Y

28.81%

5Y*

N/A

10Y*

N/A

*Annualized

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Risk-Adjusted Performance

INFA vs. CFLT — Risk-Adjusted Performance Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

INFA
The Risk-Adjusted Performance Rank of INFA is 2424
Overall Rank
The Sharpe Ratio Rank of INFA is 2222
Sharpe Ratio Rank
The Sortino Ratio Rank of INFA is 2020
Sortino Ratio Rank
The Omega Ratio Rank of INFA is 2020
Omega Ratio Rank
The Calmar Ratio Rank of INFA is 2222
Calmar Ratio Rank
The Martin Ratio Rank of INFA is 3333
Martin Ratio Rank

CFLT
The Risk-Adjusted Performance Rank of CFLT is 6363
Overall Rank
The Sharpe Ratio Rank of CFLT is 6464
Sharpe Ratio Rank
The Sortino Ratio Rank of CFLT is 6565
Sortino Ratio Rank
The Omega Ratio Rank of CFLT is 6363
Omega Ratio Rank
The Calmar Ratio Rank of CFLT is 6363
Calmar Ratio Rank
The Martin Ratio Rank of CFLT is 6060
Martin Ratio Rank
The risk-adjusted ranks indicate the investment's position relative to the market. A rank closer to 100 signifies top-performing investments, while a rank closer to 0 might suggest underperformance, based on the selected ratio. The values are calculated based on the past 12 months of returns.

INFA vs. CFLT - Risk-Adjusted Performance Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Informatica Inc. (INFA) and Confluent, Inc. (CFLT). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


Sharpe ratio
The chart of Sharpe ratio for INFA, currently valued at -0.46, compared to the broader market-2.000.002.00-0.460.49
The chart of Sortino ratio for INFA, currently valued at -0.46, compared to the broader market-4.00-2.000.002.004.00-0.461.24
The chart of Omega ratio for INFA, currently valued at 0.94, compared to the broader market0.501.001.502.000.941.16
The chart of Calmar ratio for INFA, currently valued at -0.40, compared to the broader market0.002.004.006.00-0.400.37
The chart of Martin ratio for INFA, currently valued at -0.59, compared to the broader market-10.000.0010.0020.00-0.591.22
INFA
CFLT

The current INFA Sharpe Ratio is -0.46, which is lower than the CFLT Sharpe Ratio of 0.49. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of INFA and CFLT, offering insights into how both investments have performed under varying market conditions. These values are calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months.


Rolling 12-month Sharpe Ratio-0.500.000.501.00AugustSeptemberOctoberNovemberDecember2025
-0.46
0.49
INFA
CFLT

Dividends

INFA vs. CFLT - Dividend Comparison

Neither INFA nor CFLT has paid dividends to shareholders.


Tickers have no history of dividend payments

Drawdowns

INFA vs. CFLT - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum INFA drawdown since its inception was -63.71%, smaller than the maximum CFLT drawdown of -82.61%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for INFA and CFLT. For additional features, visit the drawdowns tool.


-80.00%-70.00%-60.00%-50.00%-40.00%-30.00%AugustSeptemberOctoberNovemberDecember2025
-35.72%
-69.09%
INFA
CFLT

Volatility

INFA vs. CFLT - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for Informatica Inc. (INFA) is 8.05%, while Confluent, Inc. (CFLT) has a volatility of 10.60%. This indicates that INFA experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than CFLT based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


5.00%10.00%15.00%20.00%25.00%AugustSeptemberOctoberNovemberDecember2025
8.05%
10.60%
INFA
CFLT

Financials

INFA vs. CFLT - Financials Comparison

This section allows you to compare key financial metrics between Informatica Inc. and Confluent, Inc.. You can select fields from income statements, balance sheets, and cash flow statements to easily visualize and compare the financial health of both companies.


Quarterly
Annual

Total Revenue: Total amount of money received from sales and other business activities


Values in USD except per share items
PortfoliosLab logo
Performance Analysis
Portfolio AnalysisPortfolio PerformanceStock ComparisonSharpe RatioMartin RatioTreynor RatioSortino RatioOmega RatioCalmar RatioSummers Ratio
Community
Discussions


Disclaimer

The information contained herein does not constitute investment advice and made available for educational purposes only. Prices and returns on equities are listed without consideration of fees, commissions, taxes, penalties, or interest payable due to purchasing, holding, or selling.

Copyright © 2025 PortfoliosLab