PWLIX vs. RLSIX
Compare and contrast key facts about PIMCO RAE Worldwide Long/Short PLUS Fund (PWLIX) and RiverPark Long/Short Opportunity Fund (RLSIX).
PWLIX is managed by PIMCO. It was launched on Dec 3, 2014. RLSIX is managed by RiverPark Funds. It was launched on Mar 29, 2012.
Performance
PWLIX vs. RLSIX - Performance Comparison
Loading graphics...
PWLIX vs. RLSIX - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
PWLIX PIMCO RAE Worldwide Long/Short PLUS Fund | 9.51% | 4.64% | 4.65% | 4.04% | 4.33% | 15.15% | -12.66% | 9.60% | 0.49% | 11.80% |
RLSIX RiverPark Long/Short Opportunity Fund | -12.16% | 8.57% | 16.06% | 43.85% | -53.89% | 2.10% | 54.74% | 20.00% | -2.20% | 22.10% |
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, PWLIX achieves a 9.51% return, which is significantly higher than RLSIX's -12.16% return. Over the past 10 years, PWLIX has outperformed RLSIX with an annualized return of 5.83%, while RLSIX has yielded a comparatively lower 5.37% annualized return.
PWLIX
- 1D
- 1.13%
- 1M
- 0.50%
- YTD
- 9.51%
- 6M
- 8.92%
- 1Y
- 6.36%
- 3Y*
- 8.08%
- 5Y*
- 7.13%
- 10Y*
- 5.83%
RLSIX
- 1D
- 0.15%
- 1M
- -6.41%
- YTD
- -12.16%
- 6M
- -12.05%
- 1Y
- 1.19%
- 3Y*
- 11.41%
- 5Y*
- -5.17%
- 10Y*
- 5.37%
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
PWLIX vs. RLSIX - Expense Ratio Comparison
PWLIX has a 1.19% expense ratio, which is lower than RLSIX's 1.75% expense ratio.
Return for Risk
PWLIX vs. RLSIX — Risk / Return Rank
PWLIX
RLSIX
PWLIX vs. RLSIX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for PIMCO RAE Worldwide Long/Short PLUS Fund (PWLIX) and RiverPark Long/Short Opportunity Fund (RLSIX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| PWLIX | RLSIX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | 0.79 | 0.09 | +0.70 |
Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | 1.14 | 0.24 | +0.90 |
Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.15 | 1.03 | +0.11 |
Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 1.38 | -0.05 | +1.43 |
Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 2.63 | -0.17 | +2.80 |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading graphics...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| PWLIX | RLSIX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.79 | 0.09 | +0.70 |
Sharpe Ratio (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.81 | -0.21 | +1.02 |
Sharpe Ratio (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | 0.65 | 0.25 | +0.40 |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 0.54 | 0.34 | +0.20 |
Correlation
The correlation between PWLIX and RLSIX is -0.02. This indicates that the assets' prices tend to move in opposite directions. Negative correlation can be particularly beneficial for diversification and risk management, as one asset may offset the losses of the other during market fluctuations.
Dividends
PWLIX vs. RLSIX - Dividend Comparison
PWLIX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 6.07%, while RLSIX has not paid dividends to shareholders.
| TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
PWLIX PIMCO RAE Worldwide Long/Short PLUS Fund | 6.07% | 6.65% | 4.75% | 5.51% | 14.75% | 11.99% | 7.31% | 6.79% | 0.39% | 10.82% | 4.16% | 3.61% |
RLSIX RiverPark Long/Short Opportunity Fund | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 11.94% | 11.66% | 1.26% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
Drawdowns
PWLIX vs. RLSIX - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum PWLIX drawdown since its inception was -26.92%, smaller than the maximum RLSIX drawdown of -60.82%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for PWLIX and RLSIX.
Loading graphics...
Drawdown Indicators
| PWLIX | RLSIX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -26.92% | -60.82% | +33.90% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -5.79% | -14.56% | +8.77% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -11.74% | -60.82% | +49.08% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -26.92% | -60.82% | +33.90% |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | 0.00% | -34.87% | +34.87% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -4.16% | -14.92% | +10.76% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 3.03% | 4.36% | -1.33% |
Volatility
PWLIX vs. RLSIX - Volatility Comparison
The current volatility for PIMCO RAE Worldwide Long/Short PLUS Fund (PWLIX) is 2.39%, while RiverPark Long/Short Opportunity Fund (RLSIX) has a volatility of 3.92%. This indicates that PWLIX experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than RLSIX based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading graphics...
Volatility by Period
| PWLIX | RLSIX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 2.39% | 3.92% | -1.53% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 6.03% | 8.89% | -2.86% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 9.04% | 16.58% | -7.54% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 8.86% | 25.20% | -16.34% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 8.94% | 21.52% | -12.58% |