PWLIX vs. MNWIX
PWLIX (PIMCO RAE Worldwide Long/Short PLUS Fund) and MNWIX (MFS Managed Wealth Fund) are both Long-Short funds. Over the past 10 years, PWLIX returned 4.41%/yr vs 3.98%/yr for MNWIX. At a 0.21 correlation, their price movements are largely independent. PWLIX charges 1.19%/yr vs 0.67%/yr for MNWIX.
Performance
PWLIX vs. MNWIX - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, PWLIX achieves a -1.77% return, which is significantly lower than MNWIX's 1.28% return. Over the past 10 years, PWLIX has outperformed MNWIX with an annualized return of 4.41%, while MNWIX has yielded a comparatively lower 3.98% annualized return.
PWLIX
- 1D
- -0.28%
- 1M
- -3.73%
- YTD
- -1.77%
- 6M
- -3.48%
- 1Y
- -0.63%
- 3Y*
- 3.90%
- 5Y*
- 4.27%
- 10Y*
- 4.41%
MNWIX
- 1D
- -0.30%
- 1M
- 0.15%
- YTD
- 1.28%
- 6M
- 0.82%
- 1Y
- 3.99%
- 3Y*
- 6.13%
- 5Y*
- 3.98%
- 10Y*
- 3.98%
PWLIX vs. MNWIX - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
PWLIX PIMCO RAE Worldwide Long/Short PLUS Fund | -1.77% | 4.64% | 4.65% | 4.04% | 4.33% | 15.15% | -12.66% | 9.60% | 0.49% | 11.80% |
MNWIX MFS Managed Wealth Fund | 1.28% | 7.71% | 6.42% | 5.41% | -2.15% | 1.35% | 3.11% | 8.70% | 2.10% | 6.70% |
Correlation
The correlation between PWLIX and MNWIX is -0.01, meaning there is essentially no relationship between their price movements. Each responds to its own set of market drivers, making them strong candidates for combining in a diversified portfolio.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | -0.01 |
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period | 0.10 |
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.11 |
Correlation (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | 0.15 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Dec 8, 2014 | 0.21 |
The correlation between PWLIX and MNWIX shifts across timeframes, from -0.01 (1 year) to 0.21 (all time), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
PWLIX vs. MNWIX — Risk / Return Rank
PWLIX
MNWIX
PWLIX vs. MNWIX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for PIMCO RAE Worldwide Long/Short PLUS Fund (PWLIX) and MFS Managed Wealth Fund (MNWIX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.
| PWLIX | MNWIX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | -0.75 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | -1.05 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.01 | 1.14 | -0.13 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | -0.01 | 0.78 | -0.79 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | -0.03 | 3.10 | -3.13 |
Loading charts...
Drawdowns
PWLIX vs. MNWIX - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum PWLIX drawdown since its inception was -26.92%, which is greater than MNWIX's maximum drawdown of -5.57%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for PWLIX and MNWIX.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| PWLIX | MNWIX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -26.92% | -5.57% | -21.35% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -10.30% | -5.57% | -4.73% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -11.74% | -5.57% | -6.17% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -11.74% | -5.57% | -6.17% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -26.92% | -5.57% | -21.35% |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -10.30% | -0.74% | -9.56% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -4.20% | -1.12% | -3.08% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 3.72% | 1.39% | +2.33% |
Volatility
PWLIX vs. MNWIX - Volatility Comparison
PIMCO RAE Worldwide Long/Short PLUS Fund (PWLIX) has a higher volatility of 3.28% compared to MFS Managed Wealth Fund (MNWIX) at 2.13%. This indicates that PWLIX's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than MNWIX based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| PWLIX | MNWIX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 3.28% | 2.13% | +1.15% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 7.02% | 4.76% | +2.26% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 8.89% | 5.86% | +3.03% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 9.02% | 4.07% | +4.95% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 9.04% | 3.89% | +5.15% |
PWLIX vs. MNWIX - Expense Ratio Comparison
PWLIX has a 1.19% expense ratio, which is higher than MNWIX's 0.67% expense ratio.
Dividends
PWLIX vs. MNWIX - Dividend Comparison
PWLIX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 5.01%, more than MNWIX's 0.75% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
MNWIX MFS Managed Wealth Fund | 0.75% | 0.76% | 1.13% | 0.78% | 0.70% | 0.13% | 0.24% | 0.54% | 0.42% | 0.94% | 2.65% | 1.19% |
PWLIX PIMCO RAE Worldwide Long/Short PLUS Fund | 5.01% | 6.65% | 4.75% | 5.51% | 14.75% | 11.99% | 7.31% | 6.79% | 0.39% | 10.82% | 4.16% | 3.61% |
Frequently Asked Questions
PWLIX and MNWIX have a correlation of -0.01, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
PWLIX has higher volatility (3.28%) compared to MNWIX (2.13%). In terms of maximum drawdown, PWLIX dropped -26.92% vs MNWIX's -5.57%.
MNWIX currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (0.74 vs -0.01), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for PWLIX and MNWIX
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer