PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
PWLIX vs. MNWIX
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

PWLIX vs. MNWIX - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in PIMCO RAE Worldwide Long/Short PLUS Fund (PWLIX) and MFS Managed Wealth Fund (MNWIX). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, PWLIX achieves a -1.77% return, which is significantly lower than MNWIX's 1.28% return. Over the past 10 years, PWLIX has outperformed MNWIX with an annualized return of 4.41%, while MNWIX has yielded a comparatively lower 3.98% annualized return.


PWLIX

1D
-0.28%
1M
-3.73%
YTD
-1.77%
6M
-3.48%
1Y
-0.63%
3Y*
3.90%
5Y*
4.27%
10Y*
4.41%

MNWIX

1D
-0.30%
1M
0.15%
YTD
1.28%
6M
0.82%
1Y
3.99%
3Y*
6.13%
5Y*
3.98%
10Y*
3.98%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

PWLIX vs. MNWIX - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
PWLIX
PIMCO RAE Worldwide Long/Short PLUS Fund
-1.77%4.64%4.65%4.04%4.33%15.15%-12.66%9.60%0.49%11.80%
MNWIX
MFS Managed Wealth Fund
1.28%7.71%6.42%5.41%-2.15%1.35%3.11%8.70%2.10%6.70%

Correlation

The correlation between PWLIX and MNWIX is -0.01, meaning there is essentially no relationship between their price movements. Each responds to its own set of market drivers, making them strong candidates for combining in a diversified portfolio.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

-0.01

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.10

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.11

Correlation (10Y)
Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.15

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Dec 8, 2014

0.21

The correlation between PWLIX and MNWIX shifts across timeframes, from -0.01 (1 year) to 0.21 (all time), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

PWLIX vs. MNWIX — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

PWLIX
PWLIX Risk / Return Rank: 33
Overall Rank
PWLIX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 33
Sharpe Ratio Rank
PWLIX Sortino Ratio Rank: 33
Sortino Ratio Rank
PWLIX Omega Ratio Rank: 33
Omega Ratio Rank
PWLIX Calmar Ratio Rank: 33
Calmar Ratio Rank
PWLIX Martin Ratio Rank: 33
Martin Ratio Rank

MNWIX
MNWIX Risk / Return Rank: 1010
Overall Rank
MNWIX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 99
Sharpe Ratio Rank
MNWIX Sortino Ratio Rank: 99
Sortino Ratio Rank
MNWIX Omega Ratio Rank: 99
Omega Ratio Rank
MNWIX Calmar Ratio Rank: 99
Calmar Ratio Rank
MNWIX Martin Ratio Rank: 1212
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

PWLIX vs. MNWIX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for PIMCO RAE Worldwide Long/Short PLUS Fund (PWLIX) and MFS Managed Wealth Fund (MNWIX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.


PWLIXMNWIXDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

-0.75

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

-1.05

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.01

1.14

-0.13

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

-0.01

0.78

-0.79

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

-0.03

3.10

-3.13

PWLIX vs. MNWIX - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current PWLIX Sharpe Ratio is -0.01, which is lower than the MNWIX Sharpe Ratio of 0.74. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of PWLIX and MNWIX, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Drawdowns

PWLIX vs. MNWIX - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum PWLIX drawdown since its inception was -26.92%, which is greater than MNWIX's maximum drawdown of -5.57%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for PWLIX and MNWIX.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


PWLIXMNWIXDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-26.92%

-5.57%

-21.35%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-10.30%

-5.57%

-4.73%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-11.74%

-5.57%

-6.17%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-11.74%

-5.57%

-6.17%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-26.92%

-5.57%

-21.35%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-10.30%

-0.74%

-9.56%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-4.20%

-1.12%

-3.08%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

3.72%

1.39%

+2.33%

Volatility

PWLIX vs. MNWIX - Volatility Comparison

PIMCO RAE Worldwide Long/Short PLUS Fund (PWLIX) has a higher volatility of 3.28% compared to MFS Managed Wealth Fund (MNWIX) at 2.13%. This indicates that PWLIX's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than MNWIX based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


PWLIXMNWIXDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

3.28%

2.13%

+1.15%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

7.02%

4.76%

+2.26%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

8.89%

5.86%

+3.03%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

9.02%

4.07%

+4.95%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

9.04%

3.89%

+5.15%

PWLIX vs. MNWIX - Expense Ratio Comparison

PWLIX has a 1.19% expense ratio, which is higher than MNWIX's 0.67% expense ratio.


Dividends

PWLIX vs. MNWIX - Dividend Comparison

PWLIX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 5.01%, more than MNWIX's 0.75% yield.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
MNWIX
MFS Managed Wealth Fund
0.75%0.76%1.13%0.78%0.70%0.13%0.24%0.54%0.42%0.94%2.65%1.19%
PWLIX
PIMCO RAE Worldwide Long/Short PLUS Fund
5.01%6.65%4.75%5.51%14.75%11.99%7.31%6.79%0.39%10.82%4.16%3.61%

Frequently Asked Questions


PWLIX and MNWIX have a correlation of -0.01, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

PWLIX has higher volatility (3.28%) compared to MNWIX (2.13%). In terms of maximum drawdown, PWLIX dropped -26.92% vs MNWIX's -5.57%.

MNWIX currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (0.74 vs -0.01), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for PWLIX and MNWIX

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer