PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
MNWIX vs. FDFIX
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

MNWIX vs. FDFIX - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in MFS Managed Wealth Fund (MNWIX) and Fidelity Flex 500 Index Fund (FDFIX). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, MNWIX achieves a 1.58% return, which is significantly lower than FDFIX's 10.05% return.


MNWIX

1D
0.22%
1M
0.45%
YTD
1.58%
6M
1.43%
1Y
4.62%
3Y*
6.23%
5Y*
4.03%
10Y*
3.94%

FDFIX

1D
1.14%
1M
0.69%
YTD
10.05%
6M
9.52%
1Y
26.74%
3Y*
20.85%
5Y*
14.02%
10Y*
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

MNWIX vs. FDFIX - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
MNWIX
MFS Managed Wealth Fund
1.58%7.71%6.42%5.41%-2.15%1.35%3.11%8.70%2.10%4.53%
FDFIX
Fidelity Flex 500 Index Fund
10.05%17.59%25.06%26.27%-18.10%28.69%18.46%31.47%-4.45%14.41%

Correlation

The correlation between MNWIX and FDFIX is 0.84, indicating a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Combining them offers limited diversification - they tend to fall together during downturns.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.84

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.70

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.62

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Mar 9, 2017

0.53

Over the past year, MNWIX and FDFIX have become more correlated (0.84) than their long-term average of 0.53, meaning their price movements have been converging.

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

MNWIX vs. FDFIX — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

MNWIX
MNWIX Risk / Return Rank: 1010
Overall Rank
MNWIX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 1010
Sharpe Ratio Rank
MNWIX Sortino Ratio Rank: 99
Sortino Ratio Rank
MNWIX Omega Ratio Rank: 99
Omega Ratio Rank
MNWIX Calmar Ratio Rank: 99
Calmar Ratio Rank
MNWIX Martin Ratio Rank: 1212
Martin Ratio Rank

FDFIX
FDFIX Risk / Return Rank: 6363
Overall Rank
FDFIX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 6161
Sharpe Ratio Rank
FDFIX Sortino Ratio Rank: 5555
Sortino Ratio Rank
FDFIX Omega Ratio Rank: 5757
Omega Ratio Rank
FDFIX Calmar Ratio Rank: 6565
Calmar Ratio Rank
FDFIX Martin Ratio Rank: 7474
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

MNWIX vs. FDFIX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for MFS Managed Wealth Fund (MNWIX) and Fidelity Flex 500 Index Fund (FDFIX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.


MNWIXFDFIXDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

-1.37

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

-1.74

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.14

1.38

-0.24

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

0.79

2.97

-2.18

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

3.15

13.11

-9.96

MNWIX vs. FDFIX - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current MNWIX Sharpe Ratio is 0.75, which is lower than the FDFIX Sharpe Ratio of 2.12. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of MNWIX and FDFIX, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Drawdowns

MNWIX vs. FDFIX - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum MNWIX drawdown since its inception was -5.57%, smaller than the maximum FDFIX drawdown of -33.77%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for MNWIX and FDFIX.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


MNWIXFDFIXDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-5.57%

-33.77%

+28.20%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-5.57%

-8.99%

+3.42%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-5.57%

-18.76%

+13.19%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-5.57%

-24.51%

+18.94%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-5.57%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-0.44%

-1.33%

+0.89%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-1.12%

-4.56%

+3.44%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

1.39%

2.03%

-0.64%

Volatility

MNWIX vs. FDFIX - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for MFS Managed Wealth Fund (MNWIX) is 2.12%, while Fidelity Flex 500 Index Fund (FDFIX) has a volatility of 4.90%. This indicates that MNWIX experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than FDFIX based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


MNWIXFDFIXDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

2.12%

4.90%

-2.78%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

4.77%

10.00%

-5.23%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

5.84%

12.61%

-6.77%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

4.07%

17.05%

-12.98%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

3.89%

18.60%

-14.71%

MNWIX vs. FDFIX - Expense Ratio Comparison

MNWIX has a 0.67% expense ratio, which is higher than FDFIX's 0.00% expense ratio.


Dividends

MNWIX vs. FDFIX - Dividend Comparison

MNWIX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.75%, less than FDFIX's 1.04% yield.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
FDFIX
Fidelity Flex 500 Index Fund
1.04%1.11%1.26%1.48%1.70%1.27%1.52%1.78%2.16%0.50%0.00%0.00%
MNWIX
MFS Managed Wealth Fund
0.75%0.76%1.13%0.78%0.70%0.13%0.24%0.54%0.42%0.94%2.65%1.19%

Frequently Asked Questions


MNWIX and FDFIX have a correlation of 0.84, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

FDFIX has higher volatility (4.90%) compared to MNWIX (2.12%). In terms of maximum drawdown, MNWIX dropped -5.57% vs FDFIX's -33.77%.

FDFIX currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.12 vs 0.75), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for MNWIX and FDFIX

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer