PWC vs. PEXL
PWC (Invesco Dynamic Market ETF) and PEXL (Pacer US Export Leaders ETF) are both Mid Cap Blend Equities funds - PWC tracks the Dynamic Market Intellidex Index while PEXL tracks the Pacer US Export Leaders Index. Both are passively managed. Over the past 5 years, PWC returned 6.10%/yr vs 13.25%/yr for PEXL. A 0.79 correlation means they provide meaningful diversification when combined. Both charge a 0.60% expense ratio.
Performance
PWC vs. PEXL - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, PWC achieves a 5.85% return, which is significantly lower than PEXL's 23.12% return.
PWC
- 1D
- -0.13%
- 1M
- 0.31%
- YTD
- 5.85%
- 6M
- 6.04%
- 1Y
- 8.50%
- 3Y*
- 13.71%
- 5Y*
- 6.10%
- 10Y*
- 9.52%
PEXL
- 1D
- 0.57%
- 1M
- 12.19%
- YTD
- 23.12%
- 6M
- 24.66%
- 1Y
- 53.95%
- 3Y*
- 22.51%
- 5Y*
- 13.25%
- 10Y*
- —
PWC vs. PEXL - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
PWC Invesco Dynamic Market ETF | 5.85% | 6.15% | 17.46% | 19.03% | -16.01% | 19.38% | 8.52% | 13.47% | -13.89% |
PEXL Pacer US Export Leaders ETF | 23.12% | 27.33% | 5.79% | 24.40% | -20.41% | 30.12% | 25.02% | 39.86% | -17.19% |
Correlation
The correlation between PWC and PEXL is 0.50, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.50 |
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period | 0.67 |
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.80 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Jul 25, 2018 | 0.79 |
Over the past year, the correlation between PWC and PEXL has dropped to 0.50 - well below their long-term average of 0.79, suggesting their price drivers have been diverging.
PWC vs. PEXL - Sectors Allocation Comparison
Sectors
PWC
PEXL
Technology
Financial Services
-
Healthcare
Consumer Cyclical
Industrials
Communication Services
Consumer Defensive
Real Estate
-
Energy
Basic Materials
Utilities
-
Technology
PWC
PEXL
Financial Services
PWC
PEXL
-
Healthcare
PWC
PEXL
Consumer Cyclical
PWC
PEXL
Industrials
PWC
PEXL
Communication Services
PWC
PEXL
Consumer Defensive
PWC
PEXL
Real Estate
PWC
PEXL
-
Energy
PWC
PEXL
Basic Materials
PWC
PEXL
Utilities
PWC
PEXL
-
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
PWC vs. PEXL — Risk / Return Rank
PWC
PEXL
PWC vs. PEXL - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Invesco Dynamic Market ETF (PWC) and Pacer US Export Leaders ETF (PEXL). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| PWC | PEXL | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | -2.18 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | -2.67 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.15 | 1.51 | -0.36 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 1.32 | 4.74 | -3.42 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 4.06 | 20.42 | -16.36 |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading charts...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| PWC | PEXL | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.88 | 3.05 | -2.18 |
Sharpe Ratio (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.38 | 0.61 | -0.23 |
Sharpe Ratio (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | 0.51 | — | — |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 0.11 | 0.65 | -0.54 |
Drawdowns
PWC vs. PEXL - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum PWC drawdown since its inception was -78.13%, which is greater than PEXL's maximum drawdown of -36.76%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for PWC and PEXL.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| PWC | PEXL | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -78.13% | -36.76% | -41.37% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -6.45% | -11.43% | +4.98% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -15.12% | -24.72% | +9.60% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -26.58% | -30.44% | +3.86% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -39.45% | — | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -2.37% | 0.00% | -2.37% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -36.21% | -6.72% | -29.49% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 2.10% | 2.65% | -0.55% |
Volatility
PWC vs. PEXL - Volatility Comparison
The current volatility for Invesco Dynamic Market ETF (PWC) is 2.14%, while Pacer US Export Leaders ETF (PEXL) has a volatility of 5.25%. This indicates that PWC experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than PEXL based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| PWC | PEXL | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 2.14% | 5.25% | -3.11% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 7.19% | 13.10% | -5.91% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 9.75% | 17.80% | -8.05% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 16.07% | 21.86% | -5.79% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 18.81% | 24.04% | -5.23% |
PWC vs. PEXL - Expense Ratio Comparison
Both PWC and PEXL have an expense ratio of 0.60%.
Dividends
PWC vs. PEXL - Dividend Comparison
PWC's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 1.68%, more than PEXL's 0.34% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
PEXL Pacer US Export Leaders ETF | 0.34% | 0.44% | 0.48% | 0.48% | 0.60% | 0.22% | 0.48% | 0.49% | 0.29% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
PWC Invesco Dynamic Market ETF | 1.68% | 1.77% | 1.58% | 1.67% | 1.51% | 0.56% | 1.09% | 0.95% | 1.44% | 1.75% | 1.35% | 1.02% |
Frequently Asked Questions
PWC and PEXL have a correlation of 0.50, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
PEXL has higher volatility (5.25%) compared to PWC (2.14%). In terms of maximum drawdown, PWC dropped -78.13% vs PEXL's -36.76%.
On 5-year performance, PEXL leads with 13.25% vs 6.10% for PWC. Both ETFs have the same 0.60% expense ratio. On volatility, PWC has been the lower-risk option at 2.14%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
Over the 5-year period, PEXL has performed better with a 13.25% return vs 6.10%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.
PWC and PEXL have the same expense ratio: 0.60% per year.
PWC has the higher dividend yield at 1.68%, compared with 0.34% for PEXL.
PWC tracks Dynamic Market Intellidex Index, while PEXL tracks Pacer US Export Leaders Index. They also come from different issuers: Invesco and Pacer.
PEXL currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (3.05 vs 0.88), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for PWC and PEXL
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer