PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
PWB vs. VXUS
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

PWB vs. VXUS - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Invesco Dynamic Large Cap Growth ETF (PWB) and Vanguard Total International Stock ETF (VXUS). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, PWB achieves a 30.14% return, which is significantly higher than VXUS's 15.42% return. Over the past 10 years, PWB has outperformed VXUS with an annualized return of 18.77%, while VXUS has yielded a comparatively lower 10.23% annualized return.


PWB

1D
3.30%
1M
7.93%
YTD
30.14%
6M
31.70%
1Y
48.14%
3Y*
33.67%
5Y*
18.60%
10Y*
18.77%

VXUS

1D
1.52%
1M
4.66%
YTD
15.42%
6M
16.87%
1Y
32.10%
3Y*
18.53%
5Y*
8.83%
10Y*
10.23%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

PWB vs. VXUS - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
PWB
Invesco Dynamic Large Cap Growth ETF
30.14%24.94%31.04%30.61%-25.81%19.58%31.89%24.68%0.88%30.71%
VXUS
Vanguard Total International Stock ETF
15.42%32.35%5.08%15.86%-16.08%8.98%10.66%21.75%-14.43%27.46%

Correlation

The correlation between PWB and VXUS is 0.74, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.74

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.65

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.71

Correlation (10Y)
Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.72

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Jan 28, 2011

0.73

The correlation between PWB and VXUS has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.65 to 0.74 - a consistent structural relationship.

PWB vs. VXUS - Sectors Allocation Comparison


Sectors
PWB
VXUS

Technology

48.9%
18.1%

Industrials

14.8%
16.1%

Communication Services

10.6%
4.4%

Financial Services

9.2%
22.3%

Consumer Defensive

7.4%
5.0%

Consumer Cyclical

4.8%
8.4%

Healthcare

3.2%
7.1%

Utilities

1.6%
3.2%

Basic Materials

1.2%
7.6%

Energy

-

5.2%

Real Estate

-

2.6%

Technology

PWB
48.9%
VXUS
18.1%

Industrials

PWB
14.8%
VXUS
16.1%

Communication Services

PWB
10.6%
VXUS
4.4%

Financial Services

PWB
9.2%
VXUS
22.3%

Consumer Defensive

PWB
7.4%
VXUS
5.0%

Consumer Cyclical

PWB
4.8%
VXUS
8.4%

Healthcare

PWB
3.2%
VXUS
7.1%

Utilities

PWB
1.6%
VXUS
3.2%

Basic Materials

PWB
1.2%
VXUS
7.6%

Energy

PWB

-

VXUS
5.2%

Real Estate

PWB

-

VXUS
2.6%

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

PWB vs. VXUS — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

PWB
PWB Risk / Return Rank: 8181
Overall Rank
PWB Sharpe Ratio Rank: 8383
Sharpe Ratio Rank
PWB Sortino Ratio Rank: 7777
Sortino Ratio Rank
PWB Omega Ratio Rank: 7777
Omega Ratio Rank
PWB Calmar Ratio Rank: 8282
Calmar Ratio Rank
PWB Martin Ratio Rank: 8787
Martin Ratio Rank

VXUS
VXUS Risk / Return Rank: 6767
Overall Rank
VXUS Sharpe Ratio Rank: 6969
Sharpe Ratio Rank
VXUS Sortino Ratio Rank: 6767
Sortino Ratio Rank
VXUS Omega Ratio Rank: 7070
Omega Ratio Rank
VXUS Calmar Ratio Rank: 6363
Calmar Ratio Rank
VXUS Martin Ratio Rank: 6767
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

PWB vs. VXUS - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Invesco Dynamic Large Cap Growth ETF (PWB) and Vanguard Total International Stock ETF (VXUS). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.


PWBVXUSDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

+0.41

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

+0.36

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.41

1.37

+0.04

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

4.00

2.86

+1.14

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

16.69

11.00

+5.69

PWB vs. VXUS - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current PWB Sharpe Ratio is 2.42, which is comparable to the VXUS Sharpe Ratio of 2.01. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of PWB and VXUS, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Drawdowns

PWB vs. VXUS - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum PWB drawdown since its inception was -52.58%, which is greater than VXUS's maximum drawdown of -35.97%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for PWB and VXUS.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


PWBVXUSDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-52.58%

-35.97%

-16.61%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-12.11%

-11.27%

-0.84%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-22.10%

-13.58%

-8.52%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-31.41%

-29.44%

-1.97%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-32.36%

-35.97%

+3.61%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

0.00%

0.00%

0.00%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-8.23%

-8.20%

-0.03%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

2.89%

2.93%

-0.04%

Volatility

PWB vs. VXUS - Volatility Comparison

Invesco Dynamic Large Cap Growth ETF (PWB) has a higher volatility of 9.23% compared to Vanguard Total International Stock ETF (VXUS) at 6.87%. This indicates that PWB's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than VXUS based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


PWBVXUSDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

9.23%

6.87%

+2.36%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

16.98%

14.09%

+2.89%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

20.07%

16.11%

+3.96%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

21.28%

16.23%

+5.05%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

20.86%

17.21%

+3.65%

PWB vs. VXUS - Expense Ratio Comparison

PWB has a 0.56% expense ratio, which is higher than VXUS's 0.05% expense ratio.


Dividends

PWB vs. VXUS - Dividend Comparison

PWB has not paid dividends to shareholders, while VXUS's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 2.63%.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
PWB
Invesco Dynamic Large Cap Growth ETF
0.00%0.00%0.08%0.37%0.31%0.04%0.21%0.58%0.97%0.54%0.82%0.67%
VXUS
Vanguard Total International Stock ETF
2.63%3.18%3.37%3.24%3.09%3.10%2.14%3.06%3.18%2.73%2.93%2.83%

Frequently Asked Questions


PWB and VXUS have a correlation of 0.74, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

PWB has higher volatility (9.23%) compared to VXUS (6.87%). In terms of maximum drawdown, PWB dropped -52.58% vs VXUS's -35.97%.

On 10-year performance, PWB leads with 18.77% vs 10.23% for VXUS. On fees, VXUS is cheaper at 0.05% per year. On volatility, VXUS has been the lower-risk option at 6.87%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Over the 10-year period, PWB has performed better with a 18.77% return vs 10.23%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

VXUS is cheaper with a 0.05% expense ratio, compared with 0.56% for PWB.

VXUS has the higher dividend yield at 2.63%, compared with 0.00% for PWB.

PWB is categorized as Large Cap Growth Equities, while VXUS is Global Equities. PWB tracks Dynamic Large Cap Growth Intellidex Index, while VXUS tracks FTSE Global All Cap ex US Index. They also come from different issuers: Invesco and Vanguard. Their fees differ too: 0.56% for PWB and 0.05% for VXUS.

PWB currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.42 vs 2.01), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for PWB and VXUS

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer