PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
PWB vs. USOY
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

PWB vs. USOY - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Invesco Dynamic Large Cap Growth ETF (PWB) and Defiance Oil Enhanced Options Income ETF (USOY). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, PWB achieves a 28.40% return, which is significantly lower than USOY's 59.86% return.


PWB

1D
0.50%
1M
10.85%
YTD
28.40%
6M
28.76%
1Y
46.56%
3Y*
34.40%
5Y*
18.57%
10Y*
18.44%

USOY

1D
1.63%
1M
-1.93%
YTD
59.86%
6M
58.33%
1Y
55.52%
3Y*
5Y*
10Y*
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

PWB vs. USOY - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)20252024
PWB
Invesco Dynamic Large Cap Growth ETF
28.40%24.94%14.71%
USOY
Defiance Oil Enhanced Options Income ETF
59.86%-7.93%7.27%

Correlation

The correlation between PWB and USOY is -0.23, meaning they tend to move in opposite directions. This is especially valuable for risk management - when one declines, the other has historically tended to hold steady or rise.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

-0.23

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since May 13, 2024

-0.07

The correlation between PWB and USOY shifts across timeframes, from -0.23 (1 year) to -0.07 (all time), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

PWB vs. USOY — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

PWB
PWB Risk / Return Rank: 7575
Overall Rank
PWB Sharpe Ratio Rank: 7777
Sharpe Ratio Rank
PWB Sortino Ratio Rank: 7171
Sortino Ratio Rank
PWB Omega Ratio Rank: 7070
Omega Ratio Rank
PWB Calmar Ratio Rank: 7777
Calmar Ratio Rank
PWB Martin Ratio Rank: 8383
Martin Ratio Rank

USOY
USOY Risk / Return Rank: 5656
Overall Rank
USOY Sharpe Ratio Rank: 5353
Sharpe Ratio Rank
USOY Sortino Ratio Rank: 4545
Sortino Ratio Rank
USOY Omega Ratio Rank: 5454
Omega Ratio Rank
USOY Calmar Ratio Rank: 7979
Calmar Ratio Rank
USOY Martin Ratio Rank: 4747
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

PWB vs. USOY - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Invesco Dynamic Large Cap Growth ETF (PWB) and Defiance Oil Enhanced Options Income ETF (USOY). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


PWBUSOYDifference

Sharpe ratio

Return per unit of total volatility

2.53

1.83

+0.70

Sortino ratio

Return per unit of downside risk

3.27

2.25

+1.03

Omega ratio

Gain probability vs. loss probability

1.42

1.34

+0.09

Calmar ratio

Return relative to maximum drawdown

3.95

4.10

-0.15

Martin ratio

Return relative to average drawdown

17.10

7.91

+9.19

PWB vs. USOY - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current PWB Sharpe Ratio is 2.53, which is higher than the USOY Sharpe Ratio of 1.83. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of PWB and USOY, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


PWBUSOYDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

2.53

1.83

+0.70

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.89

Sharpe Ratio (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.89

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

0.61

0.96

-0.35

Drawdowns

PWB vs. USOY - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum PWB drawdown since its inception was -52.58%, which is greater than USOY's maximum drawdown of -17.46%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for PWB and USOY.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


PWBUSOYDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-52.58%

-17.46%

-35.12%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-12.11%

-14.29%

+2.18%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-22.10%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-31.41%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-32.36%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

0.00%

-6.47%

+6.47%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-8.24%

-6.47%

-1.77%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

2.80%

7.42%

-4.62%

Volatility

PWB vs. USOY - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for Invesco Dynamic Large Cap Growth ETF (PWB) is 5.39%, while Defiance Oil Enhanced Options Income ETF (USOY) has a volatility of 11.94%. This indicates that PWB experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than USOY based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


PWBUSOYDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

5.39%

11.94%

-6.55%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

15.03%

27.16%

-12.13%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

18.48%

30.46%

-11.98%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

21.00%

26.14%

-5.14%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

20.71%

26.14%

-5.43%

PWB vs. USOY - Expense Ratio Comparison

PWB has a 0.56% expense ratio, which is lower than USOY's 1.22% expense ratio.


Dividends

PWB vs. USOY - Dividend Comparison

PWB has not paid dividends to shareholders, while USOY's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 54.95%.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
PWB
Invesco Dynamic Large Cap Growth ETF
0.00%0.00%0.08%0.37%0.31%0.04%0.21%0.58%0.97%0.54%0.82%0.67%
USOY
Defiance Oil Enhanced Options Income ETF
54.95%104.32%48.60%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%

Frequently Asked Questions


PWB and USOY have a correlation of -0.23, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

USOY has higher volatility (11.94%) compared to PWB (5.39%). In terms of maximum drawdown, PWB dropped -52.58% vs USOY's -17.46%.

On 1-year performance, USOY leads with 55.52% vs 46.56% for PWB. On fees, PWB is cheaper at 0.56% per year. On volatility, PWB has been the lower-risk option at 5.39%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Over the 1-year period, USOY has performed better with a 55.52% return vs 46.56%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

PWB is cheaper with a 0.56% expense ratio, compared with 1.22% for USOY.

USOY has the higher dividend yield at 54.95%, compared with 0.00% for PWB.

PWB is categorized as Large Cap Growth Equities, while USOY is Derivative Income. They also come from different issuers: Invesco and Defiance. Their fees differ too: 0.56% for PWB and 1.22% for USOY.

PWB currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.53 vs 1.83), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for PWB and USOY

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer