PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
PWB vs. PTF
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

PWB vs. PTF - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Invesco Dynamic Large Cap Growth ETF (PWB) and Invesco DWA Technology Momentum ETF (PTF). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, PWB achieves a 25.98% return, which is significantly lower than PTF's 69.64% return. Over the past 10 years, PWB has underperformed PTF with an annualized return of 18.33%, while PTF has yielded a comparatively higher 26.39% annualized return.


PWB

1D
1.29%
1M
2.46%
YTD
25.98%
6M
26.73%
1Y
43.40%
3Y*
32.74%
5Y*
17.69%
10Y*
18.33%

PTF

1D
1.49%
1M
4.93%
YTD
69.64%
6M
66.68%
1Y
99.51%
3Y*
39.34%
5Y*
21.88%
10Y*
26.39%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

PWB vs. PTF - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
PWB
Invesco Dynamic Large Cap Growth ETF
25.98%24.94%31.04%30.61%-25.81%19.58%31.89%24.68%0.88%30.71%
PTF
Invesco DWA Technology Momentum ETF
69.64%5.68%43.65%33.73%-31.75%18.10%82.06%46.71%0.01%32.07%

Correlation

The correlation between PWB and PTF is 0.84, indicating a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Combining them offers limited diversification - they tend to fall together during downturns.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.84

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.82

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.86

Correlation (10Y)
Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.83

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Oct 12, 2006

0.81

The correlation between PWB and PTF has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.81 to 0.86 - a consistent structural relationship.

PWB vs. PTF - Sectors Allocation Comparison


Sectors
PWB
PTF

Technology

48.9%
93.8%

Industrials

14.8%
1.8%

Communication Services

10.6%
4.7%

Financial Services

9.2%
1.5%

Consumer Defensive

7.4%

-

Consumer Cyclical

4.8%

-

Healthcare

3.2%

-

Utilities

1.6%

-

Basic Materials

1.2%

-

Energy

-

1.6%

Real Estate

-

-

Technology

PWB
48.9%
PTF
93.8%

Industrials

PWB
14.8%
PTF
1.8%

Communication Services

PWB
10.6%
PTF
4.7%

Financial Services

PWB
9.2%
PTF
1.5%

Consumer Defensive

PWB
7.4%
PTF

-

Consumer Cyclical

PWB
4.8%
PTF

-

Healthcare

PWB
3.2%
PTF

-

Utilities

PWB
1.6%
PTF

-

Basic Materials

PWB
1.2%
PTF

-

Energy

PWB

-

PTF
1.6%

Real Estate

PWB

-

PTF

-

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

PWB vs. PTF — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

PWB
PWB Risk / Return Rank: 7676
Overall Rank
PWB Sharpe Ratio Rank: 7777
Sharpe Ratio Rank
PWB Sortino Ratio Rank: 7171
Sortino Ratio Rank
PWB Omega Ratio Rank: 7272
Omega Ratio Rank
PWB Calmar Ratio Rank: 7777
Calmar Ratio Rank
PWB Martin Ratio Rank: 8383
Martin Ratio Rank

PTF
PTF Risk / Return Rank: 8383
Overall Rank
PTF Sharpe Ratio Rank: 8585
Sharpe Ratio Rank
PTF Sortino Ratio Rank: 7070
Sortino Ratio Rank
PTF Omega Ratio Rank: 7474
Omega Ratio Rank
PTF Calmar Ratio Rank: 9292
Calmar Ratio Rank
PTF Martin Ratio Rank: 9292
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

PWB vs. PTF - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Invesco Dynamic Large Cap Growth ETF (PWB) and Invesco DWA Technology Momentum ETF (PTF). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.


PWBPTFDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

-0.25

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

+0.04

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.37

1.38

-0.01

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

3.50

5.36

-1.86

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

14.63

20.45

-5.82

PWB vs. PTF - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current PWB Sharpe Ratio is 2.14, which is comparable to the PTF Sharpe Ratio of 2.39. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of PWB and PTF, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Drawdowns

PWB vs. PTF - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum PWB drawdown since its inception was -52.58%, smaller than the maximum PTF drawdown of -55.38%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for PWB and PTF.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


PWBPTFDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-52.58%

-55.38%

+2.80%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-12.11%

-17.99%

+5.88%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-22.10%

-36.11%

+14.01%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-31.41%

-44.88%

+13.47%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-32.36%

-44.88%

+12.52%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-2.10%

-4.47%

+2.37%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-8.23%

-13.26%

+5.03%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

2.89%

4.71%

-1.82%

Volatility

PWB vs. PTF - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for Invesco Dynamic Large Cap Growth ETF (PWB) is 8.70%, while Invesco DWA Technology Momentum ETF (PTF) has a volatility of 16.30%. This indicates that PWB experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than PTF based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


PWBPTFDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

8.70%

16.30%

-7.60%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

16.70%

31.97%

-15.27%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

19.80%

40.36%

-20.56%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

21.23%

35.34%

-14.11%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

20.83%

33.16%

-12.33%

PWB vs. PTF - Expense Ratio Comparison

PWB has a 0.56% expense ratio, which is lower than PTF's 0.60% expense ratio.


Dividends

PWB vs. PTF - Dividend Comparison

PWB has not paid dividends to shareholders, while PTF's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.01%.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
PTF
Invesco DWA Technology Momentum ETF
0.01%0.21%0.00%0.07%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.08%0.04%0.26%0.00%
PWB
Invesco Dynamic Large Cap Growth ETF
0.00%0.00%0.08%0.37%0.31%0.04%0.21%0.58%0.97%0.54%0.82%0.67%

Frequently Asked Questions


PWB and PTF have a correlation of 0.84, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

PTF has higher volatility (16.30%) compared to PWB (8.70%). In terms of maximum drawdown, PWB dropped -52.58% vs PTF's -55.38%.

On 10-year performance, PTF leads with 26.39% vs 18.33% for PWB. On fees, PWB is cheaper at 0.56% per year. On volatility, PWB has been the lower-risk option at 8.70%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Over the 10-year period, PTF has performed better with a 26.39% return vs 18.33%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

PWB is cheaper with a 0.56% expense ratio, compared with 0.60% for PTF.

PTF has the higher dividend yield at 0.01%, compared with 0.00% for PWB.

PWB is categorized as Large Cap Growth Equities, while PTF is Momentum. PWB tracks Dynamic Large Cap Growth Intellidex Index, while PTF tracks DWA Technology Technical Leaders Index. Their fees differ too: 0.56% for PWB and 0.60% for PTF.

PTF currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.39 vs 2.14), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for PWB and PTF

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer