PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
PWB vs. GRNY
Performance
Return for Risk
Dividends
Drawdowns
Volatility

Performance

PWB vs. GRNY - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Invesco Dynamic Large Cap Growth ETF (PWB) and Fundstrat Granny Shots US Large Cap ETF (GRNY). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading graphics...

PWB vs. GRNY - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)20252024
PWB
Invesco Dynamic Large Cap Growth ETF
0.70%24.94%-1.66%
GRNY
Fundstrat Granny Shots US Large Cap ETF
-2.95%24.05%-1.09%

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, PWB achieves a 0.70% return, which is significantly higher than GRNY's -2.95% return.


PWB

1D
1.64%
1M
-5.39%
YTD
0.70%
6M
1.86%
1Y
32.07%
3Y*
25.50%
5Y*
13.29%
10Y*
15.63%

GRNY

1D
0.67%
1M
-4.26%
YTD
-2.95%
6M
-4.49%
1Y
30.67%
3Y*
5Y*
10Y*
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


PWB vs. GRNY - Expense Ratio Comparison

PWB has a 0.56% expense ratio, which is lower than GRNY's 0.75% expense ratio.


Return for Risk

PWB vs. GRNY — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

PWB
PWB Risk / Return Rank: 7878
Overall Rank
PWB Sharpe Ratio Rank: 7474
Sharpe Ratio Rank
PWB Sortino Ratio Rank: 7575
Sortino Ratio Rank
PWB Omega Ratio Rank: 7272
Omega Ratio Rank
PWB Calmar Ratio Rank: 8686
Calmar Ratio Rank
PWB Martin Ratio Rank: 8585
Martin Ratio Rank

GRNY
GRNY Risk / Return Rank: 7373
Overall Rank
GRNY Sharpe Ratio Rank: 6969
Sharpe Ratio Rank
GRNY Sortino Ratio Rank: 7272
Sortino Ratio Rank
GRNY Omega Ratio Rank: 6868
Omega Ratio Rank
GRNY Calmar Ratio Rank: 8282
Calmar Ratio Rank
GRNY Martin Ratio Rank: 7373
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

PWB vs. GRNY - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Invesco Dynamic Large Cap Growth ETF (PWB) and Fundstrat Granny Shots US Large Cap ETF (GRNY). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


PWBGRNYDifference

Sharpe ratio

Return per unit of total volatility

1.38

1.26

+0.13

Sortino ratio

Return per unit of downside risk

1.97

1.86

+0.11

Omega ratio

Gain probability vs. loss probability

1.28

1.26

+0.02

Calmar ratio

Return relative to maximum drawdown

2.75

2.41

+0.34

Martin ratio

Return relative to average drawdown

10.56

7.89

+2.67

PWB vs. GRNY - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current PWB Sharpe Ratio is 1.38, which is comparable to the GRNY Sharpe Ratio of 1.26. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of PWB and GRNY, offering insights into how both investments have performed under varying market conditions. These values are calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months.


Loading graphics...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


PWBGRNYDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

1.38

1.26

+0.13

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.64

Sharpe Ratio (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.76

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

0.55

0.56

-0.01

Correlation

The correlation between PWB and GRNY is 0.94, which is considered to be high. That indicates a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Having highly-correlated positions in a portfolio may signal a lack of diversification, potentially leading to increased risk during market downturns.


Dividends

PWB vs. GRNY - Dividend Comparison

Neither PWB nor GRNY has paid dividends to shareholders.


TTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
PWB
Invesco Dynamic Large Cap Growth ETF
0.00%0.00%0.08%0.37%0.31%0.04%0.21%0.58%0.97%0.54%0.82%0.67%
GRNY
Fundstrat Granny Shots US Large Cap ETF
0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%

Drawdowns

PWB vs. GRNY - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum PWB drawdown since its inception was -52.58%, which is greater than GRNY's maximum drawdown of -24.18%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for PWB and GRNY.


Loading graphics...

Drawdown Indicators


PWBGRNYDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-52.58%

-24.18%

-28.40%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-12.11%

-13.36%

+1.25%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-31.41%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-32.36%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-7.11%

-8.39%

+1.28%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-8.29%

-4.33%

-3.96%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

3.15%

4.08%

-0.93%

Volatility

PWB vs. GRNY - Volatility Comparison

Invesco Dynamic Large Cap Growth ETF (PWB) has a higher volatility of 7.94% compared to Fundstrat Granny Shots US Large Cap ETF (GRNY) at 6.27%. This indicates that PWB's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than GRNY based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading graphics...

Volatility by Period


PWBGRNYDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

7.94%

6.27%

+1.67%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

15.24%

14.35%

+0.89%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

23.28%

24.51%

-1.23%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

20.96%

24.00%

-3.04%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

20.59%

24.00%

-3.41%