PVL vs. PWR
PVL (Permianville Royalty Trust) and PWR (Quanta Services, Inc.) are both stocks. PVL operates in Oil & Gas E&P (Energy), while PWR operates in Engineering & Construction (Industrials). Over the past 10 years, PVL returned 1.75%/yr vs 41.77%/yr for PWR. At a 0.13 correlation, their price movements are largely independent.
Performance
PVL vs. PWR - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, PVL achieves a 2.40% return, which is significantly lower than PWR's 75.44% return. Over the past 10 years, PVL has underperformed PWR with an annualized return of 1.75%, while PWR has yielded a comparatively higher 41.77% annualized return.
PVL
- 1D
- -0.56%
- 1M
- -8.00%
- YTD
- 2.40%
- 6M
- 4.87%
- 1Y
- 5.86%
- 3Y*
- -2.49%
- 5Y*
- 9.02%
- 10Y*
- 1.75%
PWR
- 1D
- 5.40%
- 1M
- 2.31%
- YTD
- 75.44%
- 6M
- 71.00%
- 1Y
- 105.35%
- 3Y*
- 58.50%
- 5Y*
- 52.73%
- 10Y*
- 41.77%
PVL vs. PWR - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
PVL Permianville Royalty Trust | 2.40% | 42.17% | -0.62% | -50.32% | 81.37% | 205.27% | -56.49% | 10.22% | -32.22% | -3.06% |
PWR Quanta Services, Inc. | 75.44% | 33.70% | 46.60% | 51.70% | 24.63% | 59.50% | 77.74% | 35.84% | -22.93% | 12.22% |
Correlation
The correlation between PVL and PWR is -0.15, meaning they tend to move in opposite directions. This is especially valuable for risk management - when one declines, the other has historically tended to hold steady or rise.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | -0.15 |
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period | 0.03 |
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.12 |
Correlation (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | 0.12 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Nov 3, 2011 | 0.13 |
The correlation between PVL and PWR shifts across timeframes, from -0.15 (1 year) to 0.13 (all time), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.
Fundamentals
PVL:
$0.14
PWR:
$7.29
PVL:
12.60
PWR:
101.53
PVL:
0.18
PWR:
5.03
PVL:
9.44
PWR:
3.74
PVL:
$4.69M
PWR:
$29.99B
PVL:
$4.28M
PWR:
$4.08B
PVL:
$3.49M
PWR:
$2.40B
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
PVL vs. PWR — Risk / Return Rank
PVL
PWR
PVL vs. PWR - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Permianville Royalty Trust (PVL) and Quanta Services, Inc. (PWR). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.
| PVL | PWR | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | -2.63 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | -2.97 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.06 | 1.46 | -0.40 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 0.41 | 6.19 | -5.79 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 0.94 | 19.09 | -18.14 |
Loading charts...
Drawdowns
PVL vs. PWR - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum PVL drawdown since its inception was -95.05%, roughly equal to the maximum PWR drawdown of -97.07%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for PVL and PWR.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| PVL | PWR | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -95.05% | -97.07% | +2.02% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -14.52% | -17.11% | +2.59% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -63.42% | -33.89% | -29.53% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -77.24% | -33.89% | -43.35% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -85.54% | -45.53% | -40.01% |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -69.33% | -5.74% | -63.59% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -63.63% | -46.81% | -16.82% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 6.23% | 5.54% | +0.69% |
Volatility
PVL vs. PWR - Volatility Comparison
The current volatility for Permianville Royalty Trust (PVL) is 7.63%, while Quanta Services, Inc. (PWR) has a volatility of 12.91%. This indicates that PVL experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than PWR based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| PVL | PWR | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 7.63% | 12.91% | -5.28% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 23.36% | 29.92% | -6.56% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 31.43% | 37.65% | -6.22% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 50.72% | 35.83% | +14.89% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 55.71% | 33.85% | +21.86% |
Dividends
PVL vs. PWR - Dividend Comparison
PVL's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 9.78%, more than PWR's 0.06% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
PVL Permianville Royalty Trust | 9.78% | 7.20% | 6.29% | 25.67% | 13.18% | 5.66% | 18.35% | 16.57% | 22.27% | 6.61% | 6.63% | 15.66% |
PWR Quanta Services, Inc. | 0.06% | 0.09% | 0.09% | 0.15% | 0.25% | 0.16% | 0.29% | 0.42% | 0.13% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
Financials
PVL vs. PWR - Financials Comparison
This section allows you to compare key financial metrics between Permianville Royalty Trust and Quanta Services, Inc.. You can select fields from income statements, balance sheets, and cash flow statements to easily visualize and compare the financial health of both companies.
Total Revenue: Total amount of money received from sales and other business activities
Frequently Asked Questions
PVL and PWR have a correlation of -0.15, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
PWR has higher volatility (12.91%) compared to PVL (7.63%). In terms of maximum drawdown, PVL dropped -95.05% vs PWR's -97.07%.
PWR currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.82 vs 0.19), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for PVL and PWR
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer