PVAL vs. PGRO

Last updated Apr 1, 2026

Compare and contrast key facts about Putnam Focused Large Cap Value ETF (PVAL) and Putnam Focused Large Cap Growth ETF (PGRO).

PVAL and PGRO are both exchange-traded funds (ETFs), meaning they are traded on stock exchanges and can be bought and sold throughout the day. PVAL is an actively managed fund by Putnam. It was launched on May 25, 2021. PGRO is an actively managed fund by Power Corporation of Canada. It was launched on May 25, 2021.

Performance

PVAL vs. PGRO - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Putnam Focused Large Cap Value ETF (PVAL) and Putnam Focused Large Cap Growth ETF (PGRO). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

PVAL vs. PGRO - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021
PVAL Putnam Focused Large Cap Value ETF	1.82%	24.13%	19.30%	18.41%	-2.61%	11.44%
PGRO Putnam Focused Large Cap Growth ETF	-9.76%	15.13%	34.01%	45.19%	-31.53%	16.67%

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, PVAL achieves a 1.82% return, which is significantly higher than PGRO's -9.76% return.

PVAL

• 1D: 2.05%
• 1M: -4.23%
• YTD: 1.82%
• 6M: 9.15%
• 1Y: 23.20%
• 3Y*: 20.23%
• 5Y*: —
• 10Y*: —

PGRO

• 1D: 3.63%
• 1M: -5.32%
• YTD: -9.76%
• 6M: -9.34%
• 1Y: 16.44%
• 3Y*: 20.79%
• 5Y*: —
• 10Y*: —

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

PVAL vs. PGRO - Expense Ratio Comparison

Both PVAL and PGRO have an expense ratio of 0.55%.

PVAL

Putnam Focused Large Cap Value ETF

PGRO

Putnam Focused Large Cap Growth ETF

Return for Risk

PVAL vs. PGRO — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

PVAL

PVAL Risk / Return Rank: 81
PVAL Sharpe Ratio Rank: 80
PVAL Sortino Ratio Rank: 80
PVAL Omega Ratio Rank: 83
PVAL Calmar Ratio Rank: 80
PVAL Martin Ratio Rank: 84

PGRO

PGRO Risk / Return Rank: 41
PGRO Sharpe Ratio Rank: 40
PGRO Sortino Ratio Rank: 45
PGRO Omega Ratio Rank: 44
PGRO Calmar Ratio Rank: 40
PGRO Martin Ratio Rank: 37

The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

PVAL vs. PGRO - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Putnam Focused Large Cap Value ETF (PVAL) and Putnam Focused Large Cap Growth ETF (PGRO). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

	PVAL	PGRO	Difference
Sharpe ratio Return per unit of total volatility	1.45	0.72	+0.73
Sortino ratio Return per unit of downside risk	2.00	1.21	+0.79
Omega ratio Gain probability vs. loss probability	1.31	1.17	+0.14
Calmar ratio Return relative to maximum drawdown	2.06	1.00	+1.07
Martin ratio Return relative to average drawdown	9.20	3.36	+5.84
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month.

PVAL vs. PGRO - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current PVAL Sharpe Ratio is 1.45, which is higher than the PGRO Sharpe Ratio of 0.72. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of PVAL and PGRO, offering insights into how both investments have performed under varying market conditions. These values are calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months.

Sharpe Ratios by Period

	PVAL	PGRO	Difference
Sharpe Ratio (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	1.45	0.72	+0.73
Sharpe Ratio (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history	0.96	0.48	+0.48

Correlation

The correlation between PVAL and PGRO is 0.65, which is considered to be moderate. This suggests that the two assets have some degree of positive relationship in their price movements. Moderate correlation can be acceptable for portfolio diversification, offering a balance between risk and potential returns.

Dividends

PVAL vs. PGRO - Dividend Comparison

PVAL's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.98%, more than PGRO's 0.02% yield.

	TTM	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021
PVAL Putnam Focused Large Cap Value ETF	0.98%	1.00%	1.34%	1.33%	0.59%	0.47%
PGRO Putnam Focused Large Cap Growth ETF	0.02%	0.02%	0.08%	0.19%	0.12%	0.00%

Drawdowns

PVAL vs. PGRO - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum PVAL drawdown since its inception was -16.64%, smaller than the maximum PGRO drawdown of -34.73%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for PVAL and PGRO.

Drawdown Indicators

	PVAL	PGRO	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	-16.64%	-34.73%	+18.09%
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	-11.94%	-16.34%	+4.40%
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	-5.33%	-13.31%	+7.98%
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	-3.09%	-10.54%	+7.45%
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	2.68%	4.85%	-2.17%

Volatility

PVAL vs. PGRO - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for Putnam Focused Large Cap Value ETF (PVAL) is 4.48%, while Putnam Focused Large Cap Growth ETF (PGRO) has a volatility of 6.91%. This indicates that PVAL experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than PGRO based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.

Volatility by Period

	PVAL	PGRO	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	4.48%	6.91%	-2.43%
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	8.51%	12.72%	-4.21%
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	16.14%	22.89%	-6.75%
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	15.39%	21.93%	-6.54%
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	15.39%	21.93%	-6.54%