PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
PVAL vs. COWZ
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

PVAL vs. COWZ - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Putnam Focused Large Cap Value ETF (PVAL) and Pacer US Cash Cows 100 ETF (COWZ). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, PVAL achieves a 11.24% return, which is significantly higher than COWZ's 6.41% return.


PVAL

1D
0.02%
1M
2.45%
YTD
11.24%
6M
14.07%
1Y
31.00%
3Y*
23.05%
5Y*
15.91%
10Y*

COWZ

1D
-0.30%
1M
0.81%
YTD
6.41%
6M
7.19%
1Y
19.32%
3Y*
13.26%
5Y*
10.11%
10Y*
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

PVAL vs. COWZ - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)20252024202320222021
PVAL
Putnam Focused Large Cap Value ETF
11.24%24.13%19.30%18.41%-2.61%11.44%
COWZ
Pacer US Cash Cows 100 ETF
6.41%8.98%10.64%14.73%0.19%10.87%

Correlation

The correlation between PVAL and COWZ is 0.73, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.73

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.82

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.86

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since May 27, 2021

0.86

The correlation between PVAL and COWZ shifts across timeframes, from 0.73 (1 year) to 0.86 (5 years), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.

PVAL vs. COWZ - Sectors Allocation Comparison


Sectors
PVAL
COWZ

Financial Services

19.1%

-

Healthcare

12.6%
21.8%

Industrials

12.1%
8.4%

Technology

11.9%
16.0%

Consumer Cyclical

10.2%
11.7%

Energy

8.4%
16.9%

Consumer Defensive

8.3%
10.9%

Communication Services

5.8%
10.4%

Utilities

5.0%

-

Basic Materials

4.4%
3.7%

Real Estate

2.1%

-

Financial Services

PVAL
19.1%
COWZ

-

Healthcare

PVAL
12.6%
COWZ
21.8%

Industrials

PVAL
12.1%
COWZ
8.4%

Technology

PVAL
11.9%
COWZ
16.0%

Consumer Cyclical

PVAL
10.2%
COWZ
11.7%

Energy

PVAL
8.4%
COWZ
16.9%

Consumer Defensive

PVAL
8.3%
COWZ
10.9%

Communication Services

PVAL
5.8%
COWZ
10.4%

Utilities

PVAL
5.0%
COWZ

-

Basic Materials

PVAL
4.4%
COWZ
3.7%

Real Estate

PVAL
2.1%
COWZ

-

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

PVAL vs. COWZ — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

PVAL
PVAL Risk / Return Rank: 8989
Overall Rank
PVAL Sharpe Ratio Rank: 9191
Sharpe Ratio Rank
PVAL Sortino Ratio Rank: 9191
Sortino Ratio Rank
PVAL Omega Ratio Rank: 9090
Omega Ratio Rank
PVAL Calmar Ratio Rank: 8585
Calmar Ratio Rank
PVAL Martin Ratio Rank: 8686
Martin Ratio Rank

COWZ
COWZ Risk / Return Rank: 6464
Overall Rank
COWZ Sharpe Ratio Rank: 5757
Sharpe Ratio Rank
COWZ Sortino Ratio Rank: 6161
Sortino Ratio Rank
COWZ Omega Ratio Rank: 5555
Omega Ratio Rank
COWZ Calmar Ratio Rank: 8181
Calmar Ratio Rank
COWZ Martin Ratio Rank: 6464
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

PVAL vs. COWZ - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Putnam Focused Large Cap Value ETF (PVAL) and Pacer US Cash Cows 100 ETF (COWZ). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


PVALCOWZDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

+1.12

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

+1.41

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.52

1.31

+0.21

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

4.31

3.88

+0.43

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

16.44

10.52

+5.92

PVAL vs. COWZ - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current PVAL Sharpe Ratio is 2.86, which is higher than the COWZ Sharpe Ratio of 1.74. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of PVAL and COWZ, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


PVALCOWZDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

2.86

1.74

+1.12

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

1.05

0.58

+0.47

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

1.06

0.64

+0.42

Drawdowns

PVAL vs. COWZ - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum PVAL drawdown since its inception was -16.64%, smaller than the maximum COWZ drawdown of -38.63%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for PVAL and COWZ.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


PVALCOWZDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-16.64%

-38.63%

+21.99%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-7.22%

-5.00%

-2.22%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-15.42%

-22.00%

+6.58%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-16.64%

-22.00%

+5.36%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-1.60%

-2.53%

+0.93%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-3.01%

-4.80%

+1.79%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

1.89%

1.84%

+0.05%

Volatility

PVAL vs. COWZ - Volatility Comparison

Putnam Focused Large Cap Value ETF (PVAL) and Pacer US Cash Cows 100 ETF (COWZ) have volatilities of 2.87% and 2.92%, respectively, indicating that both stocks experience similar levels of price fluctuations. This suggests that the risk associated with both stocks, as measured by volatility, is nearly the same. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


PVALCOWZDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

2.87%

2.92%

-0.05%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

8.41%

7.21%

+1.20%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

10.91%

11.16%

-0.25%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

15.29%

17.64%

-2.35%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

15.24%

19.92%

-4.68%

PVAL vs. COWZ - Expense Ratio Comparison

PVAL has a 0.55% expense ratio, which is higher than COWZ's 0.49% expense ratio.


Dividends

PVAL vs. COWZ - Dividend Comparison

PVAL's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.98%, less than COWZ's 1.94% yield.


PositionTTM2025202420232022202120202019201820172016
COWZ
Pacer US Cash Cows 100 ETF
1.94%2.19%1.82%1.92%1.96%1.48%2.54%1.96%1.67%1.95%0.13%
PVAL
Putnam Focused Large Cap Value ETF
0.98%1.00%1.34%1.33%0.59%0.47%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%

Frequently Asked Questions


PVAL and COWZ have a correlation of 0.73, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

COWZ has higher volatility (2.92%) compared to PVAL (2.87%). In terms of maximum drawdown, PVAL dropped -16.64% vs COWZ's -38.63%.

On 5-year performance, PVAL leads with 15.91% vs 10.11% for COWZ. On fees, COWZ is cheaper at 0.49% per year. Their volatility is very similar. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Over the 5-year period, PVAL has performed better with a 15.91% return vs 10.11%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

COWZ is cheaper with a 0.49% expense ratio, compared with 0.55% for PVAL.

COWZ has the higher dividend yield at 1.94%, compared with 0.98% for PVAL.

PVAL is categorized as Large Cap Value Equities, while COWZ is Mid Cap Value Equities. They also come from different issuers: Putnam and Pacer. Their fees differ too: 0.55% for PVAL and 0.49% for COWZ.

PVAL currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.86 vs 1.74), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for PVAL and COWZ

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer