PVAL vs. COWZ
PVAL (Putnam Focused Large Cap Value ETF) and COWZ (Pacer US Cash Cows 100 ETF) are both exchange-traded funds - PVAL is a Large Cap Value Equities fund actively managed by Putnam, while COWZ is a Mid Cap Value Equities fund tracking the Pacer US Cash Cows 100 Index. PVAL is actively managed, while COWZ is passively managed. Over the past 5 years, PVAL returned 15.91%/yr vs 10.11%/yr for COWZ. Their correlation of 0.86 suggests significant overlap in exposure. PVAL charges 0.55%/yr vs 0.49%/yr for COWZ.
Performance
PVAL vs. COWZ - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, PVAL achieves a 11.24% return, which is significantly higher than COWZ's 6.41% return.
PVAL
- 1D
- 0.02%
- 1M
- 2.45%
- YTD
- 11.24%
- 6M
- 14.07%
- 1Y
- 31.00%
- 3Y*
- 23.05%
- 5Y*
- 15.91%
- 10Y*
- —
COWZ
- 1D
- -0.30%
- 1M
- 0.81%
- YTD
- 6.41%
- 6M
- 7.19%
- 1Y
- 19.32%
- 3Y*
- 13.26%
- 5Y*
- 10.11%
- 10Y*
- —
PVAL vs. COWZ - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
PVAL Putnam Focused Large Cap Value ETF | 11.24% | 24.13% | 19.30% | 18.41% | -2.61% | 11.44% |
COWZ Pacer US Cash Cows 100 ETF | 6.41% | 8.98% | 10.64% | 14.73% | 0.19% | 10.87% |
Correlation
The correlation between PVAL and COWZ is 0.73, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.73 |
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period | 0.82 |
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.86 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since May 27, 2021 | 0.86 |
The correlation between PVAL and COWZ shifts across timeframes, from 0.73 (1 year) to 0.86 (5 years), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.
PVAL vs. COWZ - Sectors Allocation Comparison
Sectors
PVAL
COWZ
Financial Services
-
Healthcare
Industrials
Technology
Consumer Cyclical
Energy
Consumer Defensive
Communication Services
Utilities
-
Basic Materials
Real Estate
-
Financial Services
PVAL
COWZ
-
Healthcare
PVAL
COWZ
Industrials
PVAL
COWZ
Technology
PVAL
COWZ
Consumer Cyclical
PVAL
COWZ
Energy
PVAL
COWZ
Consumer Defensive
PVAL
COWZ
Communication Services
PVAL
COWZ
Utilities
PVAL
COWZ
-
Basic Materials
PVAL
COWZ
Real Estate
PVAL
COWZ
-
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
PVAL vs. COWZ — Risk / Return Rank
PVAL
COWZ
PVAL vs. COWZ - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Putnam Focused Large Cap Value ETF (PVAL) and Pacer US Cash Cows 100 ETF (COWZ). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| PVAL | COWZ | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | +1.12 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | +1.41 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.52 | 1.31 | +0.21 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 4.31 | 3.88 | +0.43 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 16.44 | 10.52 | +5.92 |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading charts...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| PVAL | COWZ | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 2.86 | 1.74 | +1.12 |
Sharpe Ratio (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 1.05 | 0.58 | +0.47 |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 1.06 | 0.64 | +0.42 |
Drawdowns
PVAL vs. COWZ - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum PVAL drawdown since its inception was -16.64%, smaller than the maximum COWZ drawdown of -38.63%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for PVAL and COWZ.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| PVAL | COWZ | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -16.64% | -38.63% | +21.99% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -7.22% | -5.00% | -2.22% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -15.42% | -22.00% | +6.58% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -16.64% | -22.00% | +5.36% |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -1.60% | -2.53% | +0.93% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -3.01% | -4.80% | +1.79% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 1.89% | 1.84% | +0.05% |
Volatility
PVAL vs. COWZ - Volatility Comparison
Putnam Focused Large Cap Value ETF (PVAL) and Pacer US Cash Cows 100 ETF (COWZ) have volatilities of 2.87% and 2.92%, respectively, indicating that both stocks experience similar levels of price fluctuations. This suggests that the risk associated with both stocks, as measured by volatility, is nearly the same. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| PVAL | COWZ | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 2.87% | 2.92% | -0.05% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 8.41% | 7.21% | +1.20% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 10.91% | 11.16% | -0.25% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 15.29% | 17.64% | -2.35% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 15.24% | 19.92% | -4.68% |
PVAL vs. COWZ - Expense Ratio Comparison
PVAL has a 0.55% expense ratio, which is higher than COWZ's 0.49% expense ratio.
Dividends
PVAL vs. COWZ - Dividend Comparison
PVAL's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.98%, less than COWZ's 1.94% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
COWZ Pacer US Cash Cows 100 ETF | 1.94% | 2.19% | 1.82% | 1.92% | 1.96% | 1.48% | 2.54% | 1.96% | 1.67% | 1.95% | 0.13% |
PVAL Putnam Focused Large Cap Value ETF | 0.98% | 1.00% | 1.34% | 1.33% | 0.59% | 0.47% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
Frequently Asked Questions
PVAL and COWZ have a correlation of 0.73, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
COWZ has higher volatility (2.92%) compared to PVAL (2.87%). In terms of maximum drawdown, PVAL dropped -16.64% vs COWZ's -38.63%.
On 5-year performance, PVAL leads with 15.91% vs 10.11% for COWZ. On fees, COWZ is cheaper at 0.49% per year. Their volatility is very similar. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
Over the 5-year period, PVAL has performed better with a 15.91% return vs 10.11%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.
COWZ is cheaper with a 0.49% expense ratio, compared with 0.55% for PVAL.
COWZ has the higher dividend yield at 1.94%, compared with 0.98% for PVAL.
PVAL is categorized as Large Cap Value Equities, while COWZ is Mid Cap Value Equities. They also come from different issuers: Putnam and Pacer. Their fees differ too: 0.55% for PVAL and 0.49% for COWZ.
PVAL currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.86 vs 1.74), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for PVAL and COWZ
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer