WPEA.PA vs. LSST

Last updated Jun 5, 2026

WPEA.PA (iShares MSCI World Swap PEA UCITS ETF) and LSST (Natixis Loomis Sayles Short Duration Income ETF) are both exchange-traded funds - WPEA.PA is a Global Equities fund tracking the MSCI World NET TR EUR Index, while LSST is a Short-Term Bond fund actively managed by Groupe BPCE. WPEA.PA is passively managed, while LSST is actively managed. At a 0.02 correlation, their price movements are largely independent. WPEA.PA charges 0.25%/yr vs 0.38%/yr for LSST.

Performance

WPEA.PA vs. LSST - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a €10,000 investment in iShares MSCI World Swap PEA UCITS ETF (WPEA.PA) and Natixis Loomis Sayles Short Duration Income ETF (LSST). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Different Trading Currencies

WPEA.PA is traded in EUR, while LSST is traded in USD. To make them comparable, the LSST values have been converted to EUR using the latest available exchange rates.

Returns By Period

WPEA.PA

• 1D: -0.06%
• 1M: 4.84%
• YTD: 11.02%
• 6M: 11.28%
• 1Y: 23.62%
• 3Y*: —
• 5Y*: —
• 10Y*: —

LSST

• 1D: —
• 1M: —
• YTD: —
• 6M: —
• 1Y: —
• 3Y*: —
• 5Y*: —
• 10Y*: —

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

WPEA.PA vs. LSST - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)	2025	2024
WPEA.PA iShares MSCI World Swap PEA UCITS ETF	11.02%	6.89%	14.51%
LSST Natixis Loomis Sayles Short Duration Income ETF	0.00%	0.00%	0.60%

Correlation

The correlation between WPEA.PA and LSST is 0.02, meaning there is essentially no relationship between their price movements. Each responds to its own set of market drivers, making them strong candidates for combining in a diversified portfolio.

	Correlation
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Apr 3, 2024	0.02

Return for Risk

WPEA.PA vs. LSST — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

WPEA.PA

WPEA.PA Risk / Return Rank: 70
WPEA.PA Sharpe Ratio Rank: 66
WPEA.PA Sortino Ratio Rank: 66
WPEA.PA Omega Ratio Rank: 69
WPEA.PA Calmar Ratio Rank: 72
WPEA.PA Martin Ratio Rank: 75

The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

WPEA.PA vs. LSST - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for iShares MSCI World Swap PEA UCITS ETF (WPEA.PA) and Natixis Loomis Sayles Short Duration Income ETF (LSST). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

	WPEA.PA	LSST	Difference
Sharpe ratio: Return per unit of total volatility	2.14	—	—
Sortino ratio: Return per unit of downside risk	3.00	—	—
Omega ratio: Gain probability vs. loss probability	1.40	—	—
Calmar ratio: Return relative to maximum drawdown	3.57	—	—
Martin ratio: Return relative to average drawdown	14.20	—	—
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month.

Sharpe Ratios by Period

	WPEA.PA	LSST	Difference
Sharpe Ratio (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	2.14	—	—
Sharpe Ratio (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history	1.03	—	—

Drawdowns

Drawdown Indicators

	WPEA.PA	LSST	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	-21.59%	—	—
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	-6.53%	—	—
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	-0.37%	—	—
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	-3.02%	—	—
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	1.65%	—	—

Volatility

Volatility by Period

	WPEA.PA	LSST	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	2.59%	—	—
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	7.55%	—	—
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	10.88%	—	—
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	14.57%	—	—
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	14.57%	—	—

WPEA.PA vs. LSST - Expense Ratio Comparison

WPEA.PA has a 0.25% expense ratio, which is lower than LSST's 0.38% expense ratio.

Dividends

WPEA.PA vs. LSST - Dividend Comparison

Neither WPEA.PA nor LSST has paid dividends to shareholders.

Position	TTM	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020	2019	2018
LSST Natixis Loomis Sayles Short Duration Income ETF	0.00%	0.00%	3.44%	3.85%	1.93%	2.73%	3.96%	2.70%	2.59%
WPEA.PA iShares MSCI World Swap PEA UCITS ETF	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%

Frequently Asked Questions

Can I hold both WPEA.PA and LSST in my portfolio?

WPEA.PA and LSST have a correlation of 0.02, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

Which ETF is better, WPEA.PA or LSST?

On fees, WPEA.PA is cheaper at 0.25% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Which ETF is cheaper, WPEA.PA or LSST?

WPEA.PA is cheaper with a 0.25% expense ratio, compared with 0.38% for LSST.

What is the main difference between WPEA.PA and LSST?

WPEA.PA is categorized as Global Equities, while LSST is Short-Term Bond. They also come from different issuers: iShares and Groupe BPCE. Their fees differ too: 0.25% for WPEA.PA and 0.38% for LSST.