PULT vs. PULS

Last updated Jul 14, 2026

PULT (Putnam ESG Ultra Short ETF) and PULS (PGIM Ultra Short Bond ETF) are both Ultrashort Bond funds. Both are actively managed. At a 0.16 correlation, their price movements are largely independent. PULT charges 0.25%/yr vs 0.15%/yr for PULS.

Performance

PULT vs. PULS - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Putnam ESG Ultra Short ETF (PULT) and PGIM Ultra Short Bond ETF (PULS). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Returns By Period

PULT

• 1D: —
• 1M: —
• 6M: —
• YTD: —
• 1Y: —
• 3Y*: —
• 5Y*: —
• 10Y*: —

PULS

• 1D: 0.02%
• 1M: 0.25%
• 6M: 1.97%
• YTD: 2.13%
• 1Y: 4.53%
• 3Y*: 5.45%
• 5Y*: 4.20%
• 10Y*: —

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

PULT vs. PULS - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)	2025	2024	2023
PULT Putnam ESG Ultra Short ETF	1.23%	5.08%	5.93%	5.47%
PULS PGIM Ultra Short Bond ETF	2.13%	4.97%	6.12%	5.94%

Correlation

The correlation between PULT and PULS is 0.28, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.

	Correlation
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	0.28
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period	0.21
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Jan 20, 2023	0.16

The correlation between PULT and PULS shifts across timeframes, from 0.16 (all time) to 0.28 (1 year), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.

Return for Risk

PULT vs. PULS — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

PULT

Risk / return metrics aren't available yet — we need at least 12 months of trading data to calculate them.

PULS

PULS Risk / Return Rank: 99
PULS Sharpe Ratio Rank: 100
PULS Sortino Ratio Rank: 99
PULS Omega Ratio Rank: 99
PULS Calmar Ratio Rank: 99
PULS Martin Ratio Rank: 99

The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

PULT vs. PULS - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Putnam ESG Ultra Short ETF (PULT) and PGIM Ultra Short Bond ETF (PULS). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.

	PULT	PULS	Difference
Sharpe ratio: Return per unit of total volatility	—	10.57	—
Sortino ratio: Return per unit of downside risk	—	27.13	—
Omega ratio: Gain probability vs. loss probability	—	6.42	—
Calmar ratio: Return relative to maximum drawdown	—	50.65	—
Martin ratio: Return relative to average drawdown	—	287.04	—

Drawdowns

Drawdown Indicators

	PULT	PULS	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	—	-5.85%	—
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	—	-0.09%	—
Max Drawdown (3Y) Largest decline over 3 years	—	-0.34%	—
Max Drawdown (5Y) Largest decline over 5 years	—	-0.79%	—
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	—	0.00%	—
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	—	-0.09%	—
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	—	0.02%	—

Volatility

Volatility by Period

	PULT	PULS	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	—	0.15%	—
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	—	0.32%	—
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	—	0.43%	—
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	—	0.70%	—
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	—	1.32%	—

PULT vs. PULS - Expense Ratio Comparison

PULT has a 0.25% expense ratio, which is higher than PULS's 0.15% expense ratio. However, both funds are considered low-cost compared to the broader market, where average expense ratios usually range from 0.3% to 0.9%.

Dividends

PULT vs. PULS - Dividend Comparison

PULT has not paid dividends to shareholders, while PULS's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 4.52%.

Position	TTM	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020	2019	2018
PULS PGIM Ultra Short Bond ETF	4.52%	4.78%	5.62%	5.48%	2.30%	1.19%	1.85%	2.69%	1.87%
PULT Putnam ESG Ultra Short ETF	3.89%	4.59%	5.38%	4.88%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%

Frequently Asked Questions

Can I hold both PULT and PULS in my portfolio?

PULT and PULS have a correlation of 0.28, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

Which ETF is better, PULT or PULS?

On fees, PULS is cheaper at 0.15% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Which ETF is cheaper, PULT or PULS?

PULS is cheaper with a 0.15% expense ratio, compared with 0.25% for PULT.

Which ETF pays a higher dividend yield, PULT or PULS?

PULS has the higher dividend yield at 4.52%, compared with 3.89% for PULT.

What is the main difference between PULT and PULS?

They also come from different issuers: Putnam and PGIM. Their fees differ too: 0.25% for PULT and 0.15% for PULS.