PULT vs. BIL

In the year-to-date period, PULT achieves a 1.79% return, which is significantly higher than BIL's 1.56% return.

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.

PULT has a 0.25% expense ratio, which is higher than BIL's 0.14% expense ratio. However, both funds are considered low-cost compared to the broader market, where average expense ratios usually range from 0.3% to 0.9%.

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Putnam ESG Ultra Short ETF (PULT) and SPDR Barclays 1-3 Month T-Bill ETF (BIL). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

The current PULT Sharpe Ratio is 10.28, which is lower than the BIL Sharpe Ratio of 20.66. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of PULT and BIL, offering insights into how both investments have performed under varying market conditions. These values are calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months.

PULT's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 4.98%, more than BIL's 4.68% yield.

The maximum PULT drawdown since its inception was -0.33%, smaller than the maximum BIL drawdown of -0.77%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for PULT and BIL. For additional features, visit the drawdowns tool.

Putnam ESG Ultra Short ETF (PULT) has a higher volatility of 0.18% compared to SPDR Barclays 1-3 Month T-Bill ETF (BIL) at 0.07%. This indicates that PULT's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than BIL based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.