PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
PUK vs. CNH
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends
Financials

Performance

PUK vs. CNH - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Prudential plc (PUK) and CNH Industrial NV (CNH). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, PUK achieves a -7.96% return, which is significantly lower than CNH's 13.12% return. Over the past 10 years, PUK has underperformed CNH with an annualized return of 2.03%, while CNH has yielded a comparatively higher 6.28% annualized return.


PUK

1D
-0.07%
1M
5.52%
6M
-10.71%
YTD
-7.96%
1Y
16.89%
3Y*
3.76%
5Y*
-2.76%
10Y*
2.03%
ALL TIME*
3.95%

CNH

1D
-2.91%
1M
-1.24%
6M
-4.49%
YTD
13.12%
1Y
-19.52%
3Y*
-10.34%
5Y*
-6.41%
10Y*
6.28%
ALL TIME*
0.21%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

PUK vs. CNH - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
PUK
Prudential plc
-7.96%99.34%-27.35%-17.04%-19.12%-0.05%-0.57%27.95%-28.44%31.12%
CNH
CNH Industrial NV
13.12%-17.10%-3.12%-22.01%-15.74%52.59%16.73%21.64%-30.31%57.67%

Correlation

The correlation between PUK and CNH is 0.32, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.32

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.39

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.49

Correlation (10Y)
Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.50

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Sep 30, 2013

0.49

The correlation between PUK and CNH shifts across timeframes, from 0.32 (1 year) to 0.50 (10 years), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.

Fundamentals

Market Cap

PUK:

$35.22B

CNH:

$12.81B

EPS

PUK:

£4.28

CNH:

$0.32

PE Ratio

PUK:

4.91

CNH:

32.56

PS Ratio

PUK:

0.81

CNH:

0.71

PB Ratio

PUK:

1.82

CNH:

1.63

Total Revenue (TTM)

PUK:

£33.63B

CNH:

$18.09B

Gross Profit (TTM)

PUK:

£20.95B

CNH:

$4.45B

EBITDA (TTM)

PUK:

£15.89B

CNH:

$2.09B

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

PUK vs. CNH — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

PUK
PUK Risk / Return Rank: 6262
Overall Rank
PUK Sharpe Ratio Rank: 6666
Sharpe Ratio Rank
PUK Sortino Ratio Rank: 5959
Sortino Ratio Rank
PUK Omega Ratio Rank: 5959
Omega Ratio Rank
PUK Calmar Ratio Rank: 6262
Calmar Ratio Rank
PUK Martin Ratio Rank: 6565
Martin Ratio Rank

CNH
CNH Risk / Return Rank: 2222
Overall Rank
CNH Sharpe Ratio Rank: 2121
Sharpe Ratio Rank
CNH Sortino Ratio Rank: 2020
Sortino Ratio Rank
CNH Omega Ratio Rank: 2222
Omega Ratio Rank
CNH Calmar Ratio Rank: 2222
Calmar Ratio Rank
CNH Martin Ratio Rank: 2424
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

PUK vs. CNH - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Prudential plc (PUK) and CNH Industrial NV (CNH). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.


PUKCNHDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

+1.15

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

+1.60

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.12

0.93

+0.19

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

0.69

-0.63

+1.32

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

1.91

-0.98

+2.90

PUK vs. CNH - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current PUK Sharpe Ratio is 0.61, which is higher than the CNH Sharpe Ratio of -0.53. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of PUK and CNH, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Drawdowns

PUK vs. CNH - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum PUK drawdown since its inception was -82.52%, which is greater than CNH's maximum drawdown of -65.82%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for PUK and CNH.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


PUKCNHDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-82.52%

-65.82%

-16.70%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-24.69%

-31.09%

+6.40%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-47.47%

-37.66%

-9.81%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-63.59%

-47.76%

-15.83%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-63.59%

-65.82%

+2.23%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-26.76%

-40.90%

+14.14%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-26.39%

-28.68%

+2.29%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

8.85%

19.92%

-11.07%

Volatility

PUK vs. CNH - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for Prudential plc (PUK) is 6.30%, while CNH Industrial NV (CNH) has a volatility of 11.31%. This indicates that PUK experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than CNH based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


PUKCNHDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

6.30%

11.31%

-5.01%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

23.67%

29.57%

-5.90%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

27.66%

36.80%

-9.14%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

34.93%

35.94%

-1.01%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

35.87%

36.49%

-0.62%

Dividends

PUK vs. CNH - Dividend Comparison

PUK's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 1.88%, more than CNH's 0.97% yield.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
CNH
CNH Industrial NV
0.97%2.71%4.15%3.25%1.88%0.68%0.00%1.85%1.87%1.64%1.50%2.92%
PUK
Prudential plc
1.88%1.54%2.64%1.72%1.28%4.60%1.70%17.06%3.71%2.33%3.50%2.62%

Financials

PUK vs. CNH - Financials Comparison

This section allows you to compare key financial metrics between Prudential plc and CNH Industrial NV. You can select fields from income statements, balance sheets, and cash flow statements to easily visualize and compare the financial health of both companies.


Quarterly
Annual

Total Revenue: Total amount of money received from sales and other business activities


2.00B4.00B6.00B8.00B10.00B12.00BJulyOctober2022AprilJulyOctober2023AprilJulyOctober2024AprilJulyOctober2025AprilJulyOctober2026
11.35B
3.83B
(PUK) Total Revenue
(CNH) Total Revenue
Please note, different currencies. PUK values in GBP, CNH values in USD

PUK vs. CNH - Profitability Comparison

The chart below illustrates the profitability comparison between Prudential plc and CNH Industrial NV over time, highlighting three key metrics: Gross Profit Margin, Operating Margin, and Net Profit Margin.

Gross Margin
Operating Margin
Net Margin
Quarterly
Annual

0.0%20.0%40.0%60.0%80.0%100.0%JulyOctober2022AprilJulyOctober2023AprilJulyOctober2024AprilJulyOctober2025AprilJulyOctober2026
100.0%
0
Portfolio components
PUK - Gross Margin

Gross margin is calculated as gross profit divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jul 2026, Prudential plc reported a gross profit of 11.35B and revenue of 11.35B. Therefore, the gross margin over that period was 100.0%.

CNH - Gross Margin

Gross margin is calculated as gross profit divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jul 2026, CNH Industrial NV reported a gross profit of 0.00 and revenue of 3.83B. Therefore, the gross margin over that period was 0.0%.

PUK - Operating Margin

Operating margin is calculated as operating income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jul 2026, Prudential plc reported an operating income of 2.39B and revenue of 11.35B, resulting in an operating margin of 21.1%.

CNH - Operating Margin

Operating margin is calculated as operating income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jul 2026, CNH Industrial NV reported an operating income of 0.00 and revenue of 3.83B, resulting in an operating margin of 0.0%.

PUK - Net Margin

Net margin is calculated as net income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jul 2026, Prudential plc reported a net income of 1.99B and revenue of 11.35B, resulting in a net margin of 17.6%.

CNH - Net Margin

Net margin is calculated as net income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jul 2026, CNH Industrial NV reported a net income of 17.00M and revenue of 3.83B, resulting in a net margin of 0.4%.


Frequently Asked Questions


PUK and CNH have a correlation of 0.32, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

CNH has higher volatility (11.31%) compared to PUK (6.30%). In terms of maximum drawdown, PUK dropped -82.52% vs CNH's -65.82%.

PUK currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (0.61 vs -0.53), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for PUK and CNH

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer