PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
CNH vs. AGCO
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends
Financials

Performance

CNH vs. AGCO - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in CNH Industrial NV (CNH) and AGCO Corporation (AGCO). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, CNH achieves a 20.90% return, which is significantly higher than AGCO's 15.20% return. Over the past 10 years, CNH has underperformed AGCO with an annualized return of 5.89%, while AGCO has yielded a comparatively higher 10.86% annualized return.


CNH

1D
0.82%
1M
9.07%
YTD
20.90%
6M
17.33%
1Y
-11.25%
3Y*
-4.62%
5Y*
-7.04%
10Y*
5.89%

AGCO

1D
1.03%
1M
-1.12%
YTD
15.20%
6M
14.31%
1Y
21.38%
3Y*
1.91%
5Y*
0.37%
10Y*
10.86%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

CNH vs. AGCO - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
CNH
CNH Industrial NV
20.90%-17.10%-3.12%-22.01%-15.74%52.59%16.73%21.64%-30.31%57.67%
AGCO
AGCO Corporation
15.20%12.85%-20.33%-7.90%24.99%16.16%34.77%40.02%-21.30%24.50%

Correlation

The correlation between CNH and AGCO is 0.72, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.72

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.74

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.74

Correlation (10Y)
Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.67

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Oct 1, 2013

0.64

The correlation between CNH and AGCO shifts across timeframes, from 0.64 (all time) to 0.74 (5 years), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.

Fundamentals

Market Cap

CNH:

$13.73B

AGCO:

$8.70B

EPS

CNH:

$0.32

AGCO:

$10.42

PE Ratio

CNH:

34.83

AGCO:

11.48

PS Ratio

CNH:

0.76

AGCO:

0.85

PB Ratio

CNH:

1.75

AGCO:

2.02

Total Revenue (TTM)

CNH:

$18.09B

AGCO:

$10.37B

Gross Profit (TTM)

CNH:

$4.45B

AGCO:

$2.58B

EBITDA (TTM)

CNH:

$2.09B

AGCO:

$984.20M

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

CNH vs. AGCO — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

CNH
CNH Risk / Return Rank: 2727
Overall Rank
CNH Sharpe Ratio Rank: 2727
Sharpe Ratio Rank
CNH Sortino Ratio Rank: 2424
Sortino Ratio Rank
CNH Omega Ratio Rank: 2525
Omega Ratio Rank
CNH Calmar Ratio Rank: 2929
Calmar Ratio Rank
CNH Martin Ratio Rank: 3030
Martin Ratio Rank

AGCO
AGCO Risk / Return Rank: 5959
Overall Rank
AGCO Sharpe Ratio Rank: 6161
Sharpe Ratio Rank
AGCO Sortino Ratio Rank: 5858
Sortino Ratio Rank
AGCO Omega Ratio Rank: 5555
Omega Ratio Rank
AGCO Calmar Ratio Rank: 6060
Calmar Ratio Rank
AGCO Martin Ratio Rank: 6060
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

CNH vs. AGCO - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for CNH Industrial NV (CNH) and AGCO Corporation (AGCO). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


CNHAGCODifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

-0.96

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

-1.45

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

0.97

1.14

-0.17

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

-0.34

0.97

-1.31

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

-0.54

2.09

-2.63

CNH vs. AGCO - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current CNH Sharpe Ratio is -0.32, which is lower than the AGCO Sharpe Ratio of 0.64. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of CNH and AGCO, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


CNHAGCODifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

-0.32

0.64

-0.96

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

-0.20

0.01

-0.21

Sharpe Ratio (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.16

0.31

-0.15

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

0.03

0.24

-0.22

Drawdowns

CNH vs. AGCO - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum CNH drawdown since its inception was -65.82%, smaller than the maximum AGCO drawdown of -83.96%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for CNH and AGCO.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


CNHAGCODifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-65.82%

-83.96%

+18.14%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-33.19%

-22.23%

-10.96%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-37.66%

-43.50%

+5.84%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-47.76%

-43.50%

-4.26%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-65.82%

-54.07%

-11.75%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-36.84%

-14.64%

-22.20%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-28.58%

-29.74%

+1.16%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

20.72%

10.26%

+10.46%

Volatility

CNH vs. AGCO - Volatility Comparison

CNH Industrial NV (CNH) has a higher volatility of 14.06% compared to AGCO Corporation (AGCO) at 11.67%. This indicates that CNH's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than AGCO based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


CNHAGCODifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

14.06%

11.67%

+2.39%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

28.65%

23.94%

+4.71%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

35.42%

33.34%

+2.08%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

35.77%

35.08%

+0.69%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

36.69%

35.04%

+1.65%

Dividends

CNH vs. AGCO - Dividend Comparison

CNH's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.91%, less than AGCO's 0.98% yield.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
AGCO
AGCO Corporation
0.98%1.11%3.92%5.03%3.91%4.10%0.62%0.82%1.08%0.78%0.90%1.06%
CNH
CNH Industrial NV
0.91%2.71%4.15%3.25%1.88%0.68%0.00%1.85%1.87%1.64%1.50%2.92%

Financials

CNH vs. AGCO - Financials Comparison

This section allows you to compare key financial metrics between CNH Industrial NV and AGCO Corporation. You can select fields from income statements, balance sheets, and cash flow statements to easily visualize and compare the financial health of both companies.


Quarterly
Annual

Total Revenue: Total amount of money received from sales and other business activities


2.00B4.00B6.00B8.00B10.00B20222023202420252026
3.83B
2.34B
(CNH) Total Revenue
(AGCO) Total Revenue
Values in USD except per share items

CNH vs. AGCO - Profitability Comparison

The chart below illustrates the profitability comparison between CNH Industrial NV and AGCO Corporation over time, highlighting three key metrics: Gross Profit Margin, Operating Margin, and Net Profit Margin.

Gross Margin
Operating Margin
Net Margin
Quarterly
Annual

0.0%10.0%20.0%30.0%40.0%202220232024202520260
24.8%
Portfolio components
CNH - Gross Margin

Gross margin is calculated as gross profit divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, CNH Industrial NV reported a gross profit of 0.00 and revenue of 3.83B. Therefore, the gross margin over that period was 0.0%.

AGCO - Gross Margin

Gross margin is calculated as gross profit divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, AGCO Corporation reported a gross profit of 581.40M and revenue of 2.34B. Therefore, the gross margin over that period was 24.8%.

CNH - Operating Margin

Operating margin is calculated as operating income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, CNH Industrial NV reported an operating income of 0.00 and revenue of 3.83B, resulting in an operating margin of 0.0%.

AGCO - Operating Margin

Operating margin is calculated as operating income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, AGCO Corporation reported an operating income of 80.70M and revenue of 2.34B, resulting in an operating margin of 3.4%.

CNH - Net Margin

Net margin is calculated as net income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, CNH Industrial NV reported a net income of 17.00M and revenue of 3.83B, resulting in a net margin of 0.4%.

AGCO - Net Margin

Net margin is calculated as net income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, AGCO Corporation reported a net income of 55.00M and revenue of 2.34B, resulting in a net margin of 2.4%.


Frequently Asked Questions


CNH and AGCO have a correlation of 0.72, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

CNH has higher volatility (14.06%) compared to AGCO (11.67%). In terms of maximum drawdown, CNH dropped -65.82% vs AGCO's -83.96%.

AGCO currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (0.64 vs -0.32), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for CNH and AGCO

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer