PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
PUIG.L vs. XZBU.L
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

PUIG.L vs. XZBU.L - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Invesco USD Corporate Bond UCITS ETF Dist (PUIG.L) and Xtrackers USD Corporate Bond SRI PAB UCITS ETF 1C (XZBU.L). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Different Trading Currencies

PUIG.L is traded in USD, while XZBU.L is traded in GBP. To make them comparable, the XZBU.L values have been converted to USD using the latest available exchange rates.

Returns By Period


PUIG.L

1D
0.27%
1M
0.46%
YTD
0.25%
6M
0.43%
1Y
5.17%
3Y*
5.14%
5Y*
0.61%
10Y*

XZBU.L

1D
1M
YTD
6M
1Y
3Y*
5Y*
10Y*
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

PUIG.L vs. XZBU.L - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020
PUIG.L
Invesco USD Corporate Bond UCITS ETF Dist
0.25%7.78%2.32%8.00%-14.87%-1.64%2.18%
XZBU.L
Xtrackers USD Corporate Bond SRI PAB UCITS ETF 1C
34.79%8.26%0.97%8.41%-18.49%-1.77%3.62%

Correlation

The correlation between PUIG.L and XZBU.L is 0.44, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.44

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.50

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.49

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Sep 11, 2020

0.50

The correlation between PUIG.L and XZBU.L has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.44 to 0.50 - a consistent structural relationship.

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

PUIG.L vs. XZBU.L — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

PUIG.L
PUIG.L Risk / Return Rank: 4141
Overall Rank
PUIG.L Sharpe Ratio Rank: 3838
Sharpe Ratio Rank
PUIG.L Sortino Ratio Rank: 3939
Sortino Ratio Rank
PUIG.L Omega Ratio Rank: 3636
Omega Ratio Rank
PUIG.L Calmar Ratio Rank: 5151
Calmar Ratio Rank
PUIG.L Martin Ratio Rank: 4242
Martin Ratio Rank

XZBU.L
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

PUIG.L vs. XZBU.L - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Invesco USD Corporate Bond UCITS ETF Dist (PUIG.L) and Xtrackers USD Corporate Bond SRI PAB UCITS ETF 1C (XZBU.L). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


PUIG.LXZBU.LDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.23

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

2.45

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

6.61

PUIG.L vs. XZBU.L - Sharpe Ratio Comparison


Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


PUIG.LXZBU.LDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

1.32

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.11

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

0.46

Drawdowns

PUIG.L vs. XZBU.L - Drawdown Comparison


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


PUIG.LXZBU.LDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-21.72%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-2.85%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-5.50%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-21.72%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-0.90%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-6.86%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

1.05%

Volatility

PUIG.L vs. XZBU.L - Volatility Comparison


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


PUIG.LXZBU.LDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

1.73%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

3.67%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

5.31%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

8.78%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

10.95%

PUIG.L vs. XZBU.L - Expense Ratio Comparison

PUIG.L has a 0.10% expense ratio, which is lower than XZBU.L's 0.16% expense ratio. Despite the difference, both funds are considered low-cost compared to the broader market, where average expense ratios usually range from 0.3% to 0.9%.


Dividends

PUIG.L vs. XZBU.L - Dividend Comparison

PUIG.L's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 4.92%, while XZBU.L has not paid dividends to shareholders.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018
PUIG.L
Invesco USD Corporate Bond UCITS ETF Dist
4.92%4.83%4.76%4.03%2.94%2.33%2.81%3.15%3.32%
XZBU.L
Xtrackers USD Corporate Bond SRI PAB UCITS ETF 1C
0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%

Frequently Asked Questions


PUIG.L and XZBU.L have a correlation of 0.44, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

On fees, PUIG.L is cheaper at 0.10% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

PUIG.L is cheaper with a 0.10% expense ratio, compared with 0.16% for XZBU.L.

Both ETFs track Bloomberg US Corp Bond TR USD. They also come from different issuers: Invesco and Xtrackers. Their fees differ too: 0.10% for PUIG.L and 0.16% for XZBU.L.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for PUIG.L and XZBU.L

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer