PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
PUIG.L vs. ERNU.L
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

PUIG.L vs. ERNU.L - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Invesco USD Corporate Bond UCITS ETF Dist (PUIG.L) and iShares USD Ultrashort Bond UCITS ETF (ERNU.L). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Different Trading Currencies

PUIG.L is traded in USD, while ERNU.L is traded in GBP. To make them comparable, the ERNU.L values have been converted to USD using the latest available exchange rates.

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, PUIG.L achieves a 0.25% return, which is significantly lower than ERNU.L's 1.61% return.


PUIG.L

1D
0.27%
1M
0.46%
YTD
0.25%
6M
0.43%
1Y
5.17%
3Y*
5.14%
5Y*
0.61%
10Y*

ERNU.L

1D
0.14%
1M
0.47%
YTD
1.61%
6M
2.05%
1Y
4.39%
3Y*
5.10%
5Y*
3.75%
10Y*
2.75%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

PUIG.L vs. ERNU.L - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
PUIG.L
Invesco USD Corporate Bond UCITS ETF Dist
0.25%7.78%2.32%8.00%-14.87%-1.64%9.49%16.94%-4.38%0.47%
ERNU.L
iShares USD Ultrashort Bond UCITS ETF
1.61%4.91%5.60%4.92%1.32%0.60%0.83%3.85%1.88%0.16%

Correlation

The correlation between PUIG.L and ERNU.L is -0.08, meaning there is essentially no relationship between their price movements. Each responds to its own set of market drivers, making them strong candidates for combining in a diversified portfolio.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

-0.08

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

-0.04

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

-0.06

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Nov 27, 2017

-0.04

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

PUIG.L vs. ERNU.L — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

PUIG.L
PUIG.L Risk / Return Rank: 4141
Overall Rank
PUIG.L Sharpe Ratio Rank: 3838
Sharpe Ratio Rank
PUIG.L Sortino Ratio Rank: 3939
Sortino Ratio Rank
PUIG.L Omega Ratio Rank: 3636
Omega Ratio Rank
PUIG.L Calmar Ratio Rank: 5151
Calmar Ratio Rank
PUIG.L Martin Ratio Rank: 4242
Martin Ratio Rank

ERNU.L
ERNU.L Risk / Return Rank: 2424
Overall Rank
ERNU.L Sharpe Ratio Rank: 2424
Sharpe Ratio Rank
ERNU.L Sortino Ratio Rank: 2424
Sortino Ratio Rank
ERNU.L Omega Ratio Rank: 2222
Omega Ratio Rank
ERNU.L Calmar Ratio Rank: 2626
Calmar Ratio Rank
ERNU.L Martin Ratio Rank: 2424
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

PUIG.L vs. ERNU.L - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Invesco USD Corporate Bond UCITS ETF Dist (PUIG.L) and iShares USD Ultrashort Bond UCITS ETF (ERNU.L). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


PUIG.LERNU.LDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

+0.29

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

+0.40

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.23

1.19

+0.05

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

2.45

4.60

-2.15

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

6.61

14.97

-8.36

PUIG.L vs. ERNU.L - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current PUIG.L Sharpe Ratio is 1.32, which is comparable to the ERNU.L Sharpe Ratio of 1.04. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of PUIG.L and ERNU.L, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


PUIG.LERNU.LDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

1.32

1.04

+0.29

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.11

0.78

-0.67

Sharpe Ratio (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.54

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

0.46

0.46

0.00

Drawdowns

PUIG.L vs. ERNU.L - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum PUIG.L drawdown since its inception was -21.72%, which is greater than ERNU.L's maximum drawdown of -8.13%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for PUIG.L and ERNU.L.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


PUIG.LERNU.LDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-21.72%

-8.13%

-13.59%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-2.85%

-0.95%

-1.90%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-5.50%

-1.00%

-4.50%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-21.72%

-2.54%

-19.18%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-8.13%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-0.90%

-0.11%

-0.79%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-6.86%

-0.57%

-6.29%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

1.05%

0.29%

+0.76%

Volatility

PUIG.L vs. ERNU.L - Volatility Comparison

Invesco USD Corporate Bond UCITS ETF Dist (PUIG.L) has a higher volatility of 1.73% compared to iShares USD Ultrashort Bond UCITS ETF (ERNU.L) at 1.50%. This indicates that PUIG.L's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than ERNU.L based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


PUIG.LERNU.LDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

1.73%

1.50%

+0.23%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

3.67%

3.57%

+0.10%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

5.31%

4.22%

+1.09%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

8.78%

4.79%

+3.99%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

10.95%

5.10%

+5.85%

PUIG.L vs. ERNU.L - Expense Ratio Comparison

PUIG.L has a 0.10% expense ratio, which is higher than ERNU.L's 0.09% expense ratio. However, both funds are considered low-cost compared to the broader market, where average expense ratios usually range from 0.3% to 0.9%.


Dividends

PUIG.L vs. ERNU.L - Dividend Comparison

PUIG.L's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 4.92%, less than ERNU.L's 5.69% yield.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
ERNU.L
iShares USD Ultrashort Bond UCITS ETF
5.69%4.68%5.45%5.00%1.55%0.48%1.65%2.77%2.17%1.43%0.93%0.70%
PUIG.L
Invesco USD Corporate Bond UCITS ETF Dist
4.92%4.83%4.76%4.03%2.94%2.33%2.81%3.15%3.32%0.00%0.00%0.00%

Frequently Asked Questions


PUIG.L and ERNU.L have a correlation of -0.08, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

On fees, ERNU.L is cheaper at 0.09% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

ERNU.L is cheaper with a 0.09% expense ratio, compared with 0.10% for PUIG.L.

PUIG.L tracks Bloomberg US Corp Bond TR USD, while ERNU.L tracks Bloomberg US Corp 1-3 Yr TR USD. They also come from different issuers: Invesco and iShares. Their fees differ too: 0.10% for PUIG.L and 0.09% for ERNU.L.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for PUIG.L and ERNU.L

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer