PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
PUI vs. VAMO
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

PUI vs. VAMO - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Invesco DWA Utilities Momentum ETF (PUI) and Cambria Value and Momentum ETF (VAMO). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, PUI achieves a 9.29% return, which is significantly higher than VAMO's 4.39% return. Over the past 10 years, PUI has outperformed VAMO with an annualized return of 8.41%, while VAMO has yielded a comparatively lower 5.87% annualized return.


PUI

1D
-0.04%
1M
-0.70%
YTD
9.29%
6M
8.68%
1Y
15.52%
3Y*
16.47%
5Y*
9.60%
10Y*
8.41%

VAMO

1D
-0.39%
1M
1.34%
YTD
4.39%
6M
3.05%
1Y
19.78%
3Y*
13.95%
5Y*
9.24%
10Y*
5.87%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

PUI vs. VAMO - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
PUI
Invesco DWA Utilities Momentum ETF
9.29%15.25%23.91%-4.47%-2.17%15.02%-5.05%20.95%6.12%11.85%
VAMO
Cambria Value and Momentum ETF
4.39%16.51%6.11%5.58%8.55%32.16%-4.92%-4.63%-11.43%3.82%

Correlation

The correlation between PUI and VAMO is 0.40, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.40

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.41

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.30

Correlation (10Y)
Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.21

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Sep 9, 2015

0.21

The correlation between PUI and VAMO shifts across timeframes, from 0.21 (all time) to 0.41 (3 years), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

PUI vs. VAMO — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

PUI
PUI Risk / Return Rank: 2828
Overall Rank
PUI Sharpe Ratio Rank: 3030
Sharpe Ratio Rank
PUI Sortino Ratio Rank: 2828
Sortino Ratio Rank
PUI Omega Ratio Rank: 2727
Omega Ratio Rank
PUI Calmar Ratio Rank: 3030
Calmar Ratio Rank
PUI Martin Ratio Rank: 2525
Martin Ratio Rank

VAMO
VAMO Risk / Return Rank: 6060
Overall Rank
VAMO Sharpe Ratio Rank: 5656
Sharpe Ratio Rank
VAMO Sortino Ratio Rank: 5858
Sortino Ratio Rank
VAMO Omega Ratio Rank: 5252
Omega Ratio Rank
VAMO Calmar Ratio Rank: 7575
Calmar Ratio Rank
VAMO Martin Ratio Rank: 6161
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

PUI vs. VAMO - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Invesco DWA Utilities Momentum ETF (PUI) and Cambria Value and Momentum ETF (VAMO). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.


PUIVAMODifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

-0.74

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

-1.13

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.18

1.31

-0.13

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

1.41

3.58

-2.17

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

3.20

10.28

-7.08

PUI vs. VAMO - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current PUI Sharpe Ratio is 1.04, which is lower than the VAMO Sharpe Ratio of 1.77. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of PUI and VAMO, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Drawdowns

PUI vs. VAMO - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum PUI drawdown since its inception was -43.20%, roughly equal to the maximum VAMO drawdown of -41.84%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for PUI and VAMO.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


PUIVAMODifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-43.20%

-41.84%

-1.36%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-11.07%

-5.55%

-5.52%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-15.28%

-11.61%

-3.67%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-23.47%

-17.25%

-6.22%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-35.61%

-41.84%

+6.23%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-2.66%

-1.59%

-1.07%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-8.45%

-9.94%

+1.49%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

4.86%

1.93%

+2.93%

Volatility

PUI vs. VAMO - Volatility Comparison

Invesco DWA Utilities Momentum ETF (PUI) has a higher volatility of 4.70% compared to Cambria Value and Momentum ETF (VAMO) at 2.70%. This indicates that PUI's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than VAMO based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


PUIVAMODifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

4.70%

2.70%

+2.00%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

11.04%

7.65%

+3.39%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

15.07%

11.23%

+3.84%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

16.62%

17.18%

-0.56%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

19.09%

18.10%

+0.99%

PUI vs. VAMO - Expense Ratio Comparison

PUI has a 0.60% expense ratio, which is lower than VAMO's 0.65% expense ratio.


Dividends

PUI vs. VAMO - Dividend Comparison

PUI's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 1.98%, more than VAMO's 0.62% yield.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
PUI
Invesco DWA Utilities Momentum ETF
1.98%2.22%2.06%2.36%2.16%2.03%2.42%2.02%1.87%2.98%3.35%2.82%
VAMO
Cambria Value and Momentum ETF
0.62%1.41%0.84%1.35%1.10%1.07%1.03%1.15%1.03%0.35%0.56%0.20%

Frequently Asked Questions


PUI and VAMO have a correlation of 0.40, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

PUI has higher volatility (4.70%) compared to VAMO (2.70%). In terms of maximum drawdown, PUI dropped -43.20% vs VAMO's -41.84%.

On 10-year performance, PUI leads with 8.41% vs 5.87% for VAMO. On fees, PUI is cheaper at 0.60% per year. On volatility, VAMO has been the lower-risk option at 2.70%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Over the 10-year period, PUI has performed better with a 8.41% return vs 5.87%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

PUI is cheaper with a 0.60% expense ratio, compared with 0.65% for VAMO.

PUI has the higher dividend yield at 1.98%, compared with 0.62% for VAMO.

They also come from different issuers: Invesco and Cambria. Their fees differ too: 0.60% for PUI and 0.65% for VAMO.

VAMO currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (1.77 vs 1.04), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for PUI and VAMO

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer