PUI vs. SMOM
PUI (Invesco DWA Utilities Momentum ETF) and SMOM (Symmetry Panoramic Sector Momentum ETF) are both exchange-traded funds - PUI is a Momentum fund tracking the DWA Utilities Technical Leaders Index, while SMOM is a Large Cap Blend Equities fund actively managed by Symmetry Partners. PUI is passively managed, while SMOM is actively managed. At a 0.49 correlation, their price movements are largely independent. PUI charges 0.60%/yr vs 0.63%/yr for SMOM.
Performance
PUI vs. SMOM - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, PUI achieves a 6.30% return, which is significantly lower than SMOM's 9.52% return.
PUI
- 1D
- -0.49%
- 1M
- -4.33%
- YTD
- 6.30%
- 6M
- 3.12%
- 1Y
- 11.74%
- 3Y*
- 15.24%
- 5Y*
- 8.55%
- 10Y*
- 8.33%
SMOM
- 1D
- 0.85%
- 1M
- 5.18%
- YTD
- 9.52%
- 6M
- 10.70%
- 1Y
- —
- 3Y*
- —
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
PUI vs. SMOM - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | |
|---|---|---|
PUI Invesco DWA Utilities Momentum ETF | 6.30% | 0.60% |
SMOM Symmetry Panoramic Sector Momentum ETF | 9.52% | 2.81% |
Correlation
The correlation between PUI and SMOM is 0.49, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Sep 11, 2025 | 0.49 |
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
PUI vs. SMOM — Risk / Return Rank
PUI
SMOM
PUI vs. SMOM - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Invesco DWA Utilities Momentum ETF (PUI) and Symmetry Panoramic Sector Momentum ETF (SMOM). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| PUI | SMOM | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | 0.79 | — | — |
Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | 1.15 | — | — |
Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.14 | — | — |
Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 1.07 | — | — |
Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 2.48 | — | — |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading charts...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| PUI | SMOM | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.79 | — | — |
Sharpe Ratio (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.52 | — | — |
Sharpe Ratio (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | 0.44 | — | — |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 0.45 | 1.42 | -0.97 |
Drawdowns
PUI vs. SMOM - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum PUI drawdown since its inception was -43.20%, which is greater than SMOM's maximum drawdown of -7.45%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for PUI and SMOM.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| PUI | SMOM | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -43.20% | -7.45% | -35.75% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -11.07% | — | — |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -15.28% | — | — |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -23.47% | — | — |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -35.61% | — | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -5.33% | 0.00% | -5.33% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -8.46% | -1.48% | -6.98% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 4.76% | — | — |
Volatility
PUI vs. SMOM - Volatility Comparison
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| PUI | SMOM | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 5.31% | — | — |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 11.14% | — | — |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 14.96% | 12.65% | +2.31% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 16.67% | 12.65% | +4.02% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 19.07% | 12.65% | +6.42% |
PUI vs. SMOM - Expense Ratio Comparison
PUI has a 0.60% expense ratio, which is lower than SMOM's 0.63% expense ratio.
Dividends
PUI vs. SMOM - Dividend Comparison
PUI's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 2.11%, more than SMOM's 0.15% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
PUI Invesco DWA Utilities Momentum ETF | 2.11% | 2.22% | 2.06% | 2.36% | 2.16% | 2.03% | 2.42% | 2.02% | 1.87% | 2.98% | 3.35% | 2.82% |
SMOM Symmetry Panoramic Sector Momentum ETF | 0.15% | 0.16% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
Frequently Asked Questions
PUI and SMOM have a correlation of 0.49, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
On fees, PUI is cheaper at 0.60% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
PUI is cheaper with a 0.60% expense ratio, compared with 0.63% for SMOM.
PUI has the higher dividend yield at 2.11%, compared with 0.15% for SMOM.
PUI is categorized as Momentum, while SMOM is Large Cap Blend Equities. They also come from different issuers: Invesco and Symmetry Partners. Their fees differ too: 0.60% for PUI and 0.63% for SMOM.
Find the right allocation for PUI and SMOM
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer