PUDZX vs. CMALX

Last updated Jun 5, 2026

PUDZX (PGIM Real Assets Fund) and CMALX (Crawford Multi-Asset Income Fund) are both Diversified Portfolio funds. Over the past 5 years, PUDZX returned 7.90%/yr vs 5.72%/yr for CMALX. A 0.69 correlation means they provide meaningful diversification when combined. PUDZX charges 0.25%/yr vs 1.00%/yr for CMALX.

Performance

PUDZX vs. CMALX - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in PGIM Real Assets Fund (PUDZX) and Crawford Multi-Asset Income Fund (CMALX). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, PUDZX achieves a 12.74% return, which is significantly higher than CMALX's 5.28% return.

PUDZX

• 1D: -0.28%
• 1M: -1.74%
• YTD: 12.74%
• 6M: 12.56%
• 1Y: 21.27%
• 3Y*: 13.32%
• 5Y*: 7.90%
• 10Y*: 6.84%

CMALX

• 1D: -0.41%
• 1M: -0.15%
• YTD: 5.28%
• 6M: 5.57%
• 1Y: 8.67%
• 3Y*: 9.93%
• 5Y*: 5.72%
• 10Y*: —

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

PUDZX vs. CMALX - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020	2019	2018	2017
PUDZX PGIM Real Assets Fund	12.74%	13.40%	8.61%	3.26%	-2.76%	18.49%	4.84%	16.29%	-9.20%	3.19%
CMALX Crawford Multi-Asset Income Fund	5.28%	5.26%	11.36%	6.42%	-0.99%	15.89%	-7.01%	20.24%	-4.85%	0.14%

Correlation

The correlation between PUDZX and CMALX is 0.54, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.

	Correlation
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	0.54
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period	0.69
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period	0.73
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Sep 13, 2017	0.69

The correlation between PUDZX and CMALX shifts across timeframes, from 0.54 (1 year) to 0.73 (5 years), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.

Return for Risk

PUDZX vs. CMALX — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

PUDZX

PUDZX Risk / Return Rank: 88
PUDZX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 87
PUDZX Sortino Ratio Rank: 81
PUDZX Omega Ratio Rank: 81
PUDZX Calmar Ratio Rank: 95
PUDZX Martin Ratio Rank: 95

CMALX

CMALX Risk / Return Rank: 26
CMALX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 27
CMALX Sortino Ratio Rank: 27
CMALX Omega Ratio Rank: 25
CMALX Calmar Ratio Rank: 27
CMALX Martin Ratio Rank: 25

The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

PUDZX vs. CMALX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for PGIM Real Assets Fund (PUDZX) and Crawford Multi-Asset Income Fund (CMALX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

	PUDZX	CMALX	Difference
Sharpe ratio: Return per unit of total volatility	2.85	1.45	+1.40
Sortino ratio: Return per unit of downside risk	3.89	2.09	+1.80
Omega ratio: Gain probability vs. loss probability	1.53	1.25	+0.28
Calmar ratio: Return relative to maximum drawdown	6.00	1.87	+4.13
Martin ratio: Return relative to average drawdown	22.02	5.97	+16.04
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month.

PUDZX vs. CMALX - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current PUDZX Sharpe Ratio is 2.85, which is higher than the CMALX Sharpe Ratio of 1.45. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of PUDZX and CMALX, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.

Sharpe Ratios by Period

	PUDZX	CMALX	Difference
Sharpe Ratio (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	2.85	1.45	+1.40
Sharpe Ratio (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period	0.75	0.64	+0.12
Sharpe Ratio (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period	0.71	—	—
Sharpe Ratio (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history	0.54	0.44	+0.09

Drawdowns

PUDZX vs. CMALX - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum PUDZX drawdown since its inception was -21.53%, smaller than the maximum CMALX drawdown of -39.04%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for PUDZX and CMALX.

Drawdown Indicators

	PUDZX	CMALX	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	-21.53%	-39.04%	+17.51%
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	-3.56%	-4.49%	+0.93%
Max Drawdown (3Y) Largest decline over 3 years	-8.20%	-7.66%	-0.54%
Max Drawdown (5Y) Largest decline over 5 years	-17.98%	-12.68%	-5.30%
Max Drawdown (10Y) Largest decline over 10 years	-21.53%	—	—
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	-2.37%	-1.76%	-0.61%
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	-5.26%	-3.76%	-1.50%
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	0.97%	1.40%	-0.43%

Volatility

PUDZX vs. CMALX - Volatility Comparison

PGIM Real Assets Fund (PUDZX) has a higher volatility of 2.05% compared to Crawford Multi-Asset Income Fund (CMALX) at 1.73%. This indicates that PUDZX's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than CMALX based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.

Volatility by Period

	PUDZX	CMALX	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	2.05%	1.73%	+0.32%
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	6.08%	4.20%	+1.88%
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	7.49%	5.78%	+1.71%
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	10.53%	9.00%	+1.53%
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	9.70%	12.64%	-2.94%

PUDZX vs. CMALX - Expense Ratio Comparison

PUDZX has a 0.25% expense ratio, which is lower than CMALX's 1.00% expense ratio.

Dividends

PUDZX vs. CMALX - Dividend Comparison

PUDZX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 7.75%, more than CMALX's 7.41% yield.

Position	TTM	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020	2019	2018	2017	2016	2015
CMALX Crawford Multi-Asset Income Fund	7.41%	7.61%	3.94%	4.66%	4.93%	3.21%	3.67%	5.07%	4.87%	0.99%	0.00%	0.00%
PUDZX PGIM Real Assets Fund	7.75%	8.93%	6.67%	3.66%	9.10%	13.00%	4.94%	3.40%	2.14%	2.10%	1.39%	1.72%

Frequently Asked Questions

Can I hold both PUDZX and CMALX in my portfolio?

PUDZX and CMALX have a correlation of 0.54, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

Which is riskier, PUDZX or CMALX?

PUDZX has higher volatility (2.05%) compared to CMALX (1.73%). In terms of maximum drawdown, PUDZX dropped -21.53% vs CMALX's -39.04%.

Which has better risk-adjusted returns?

PUDZX currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.85 vs 1.45), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.