PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
CMALX vs. CDOFX
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

CMALX vs. CDOFX - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Crawford Multi-Asset Income Fund (CMALX) and Crawford Small Cap Dividend Fund (CDOFX). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, CMALX achieves a 6.54% return, which is significantly lower than CDOFX's 14.09% return.


CMALX

1D
0.48%
1M
-0.59%
YTD
6.54%
6M
6.79%
1Y
9.11%
3Y*
10.61%
5Y*
6.16%
10Y*

CDOFX

1D
-0.26%
1M
3.59%
YTD
14.09%
6M
11.73%
1Y
20.21%
3Y*
11.60%
5Y*
5.59%
10Y*
9.25%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

CMALX vs. CDOFX - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
CMALX
Crawford Multi-Asset Income Fund
6.54%5.26%11.36%6.42%-0.99%15.89%-7.01%20.24%-4.85%0.14%
CDOFX
Crawford Small Cap Dividend Fund
14.09%0.44%10.43%14.63%-14.07%22.03%3.51%22.04%-7.60%9.92%

Correlation

The correlation between CMALX and CDOFX is 0.58, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.58

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.65

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.73

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Sep 12, 2017

0.76

The correlation between CMALX and CDOFX shifts across timeframes, from 0.58 (1 year) to 0.76 (all time), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

CMALX vs. CDOFX — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

CMALX
CMALX Risk / Return Rank: 3434
Overall Rank
CMALX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 3535
Sharpe Ratio Rank
CMALX Sortino Ratio Rank: 3434
Sortino Ratio Rank
CMALX Omega Ratio Rank: 3232
Omega Ratio Rank
CMALX Calmar Ratio Rank: 3535
Calmar Ratio Rank
CMALX Martin Ratio Rank: 3232
Martin Ratio Rank

CDOFX
CDOFX Risk / Return Rank: 2828
Overall Rank
CDOFX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 2525
Sharpe Ratio Rank
CDOFX Sortino Ratio Rank: 2727
Sortino Ratio Rank
CDOFX Omega Ratio Rank: 2424
Omega Ratio Rank
CDOFX Calmar Ratio Rank: 3333
Calmar Ratio Rank
CDOFX Martin Ratio Rank: 3030
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

CMALX vs. CDOFX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Crawford Multi-Asset Income Fund (CMALX) and Crawford Small Cap Dividend Fund (CDOFX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.


CMALXCDOFXDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

+0.27

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

+0.26

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.28

1.23

+0.04

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

2.12

2.04

+0.08

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

6.73

6.39

+0.34

CMALX vs. CDOFX - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current CMALX Sharpe Ratio is 1.59, which is comparable to the CDOFX Sharpe Ratio of 1.31. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of CMALX and CDOFX, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Drawdowns

CMALX vs. CDOFX - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum CMALX drawdown since its inception was -39.04%, roughly equal to the maximum CDOFX drawdown of -39.92%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for CMALX and CDOFX.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


CMALXCDOFXDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-39.04%

-39.92%

+0.88%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-4.49%

-10.95%

+6.46%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-7.66%

-24.11%

+16.45%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-12.68%

-24.11%

+11.43%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-39.92%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-1.10%

-0.26%

-0.84%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-3.74%

-6.10%

+2.36%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

1.41%

3.48%

-2.07%

Volatility

CMALX vs. CDOFX - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for Crawford Multi-Asset Income Fund (CMALX) is 2.26%, while Crawford Small Cap Dividend Fund (CDOFX) has a volatility of 4.61%. This indicates that CMALX experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than CDOFX based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


CMALXCDOFXDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

2.26%

4.61%

-2.35%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

4.42%

11.71%

-7.29%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

6.02%

17.03%

-11.01%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

8.99%

19.19%

-10.20%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

12.62%

20.63%

-8.01%

CMALX vs. CDOFX - Expense Ratio Comparison

CMALX has a 1.00% expense ratio, which is higher than CDOFX's 0.99% expense ratio.


Dividends

CMALX vs. CDOFX - Dividend Comparison

CMALX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 7.32%, more than CDOFX's 3.10% yield.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
CDOFX
Crawford Small Cap Dividend Fund
3.10%3.54%4.09%1.14%4.17%7.23%1.99%5.68%7.70%5.58%1.31%7.46%
CMALX
Crawford Multi-Asset Income Fund
7.32%7.61%3.94%4.66%4.93%3.21%3.67%5.07%4.87%0.99%0.00%0.00%

Frequently Asked Questions


CMALX and CDOFX have a correlation of 0.58, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

CDOFX has higher volatility (4.61%) compared to CMALX (2.26%). In terms of maximum drawdown, CMALX dropped -39.04% vs CDOFX's -39.92%.

CMALX currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (1.59 vs 1.31), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for CMALX and CDOFX

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer