PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
CMALX vs. CDOFX
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

CMALX vs. CDOFX - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Crawford Multi-Asset Income Fund (CMALX) and Crawford Small Cap Dividend Fund (CDOFX). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, CMALX achieves a 8.57% return, which is significantly lower than CDOFX's 15.96% return.


CMALX

1D
-0.40%
1M
-0.07%
6M
5.35%
YTD
8.57%
1Y
10.13%
3Y*
9.61%
5Y*
6.60%
10Y*
ALL TIME*
5.84%

CDOFX

1D
0.17%
1M
-0.45%
6M
7.57%
YTD
15.96%
1Y
20.22%
3Y*
9.74%
5Y*
6.14%
10Y*
8.88%
ALL TIME*
9.98%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

Liquidity Comparison


PositionAvg. Volume Value (2W)Avg. Volume Value (1M)Avg. Volume Value (3M)
$0.00$0.00$0.00
$0.00$0.00$0.00

CMALX vs. CDOFX - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
CMALX
Crawford Multi-Asset Income Fund
8.57%5.26%11.36%6.42%-0.99%15.89%-7.01%20.24%-4.85%0.14%
CDOFX
Crawford Small Cap Dividend Fund
15.96%0.44%10.43%14.63%-14.07%22.03%3.51%22.04%-7.60%9.92%

Correlation

The correlation between CMALX and CDOFX is 0.50, which is low. Their historical price movements had little consistent relationship.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Focuses on recent behavior, but can change the most.

0.50

Correlation (3Y)
Balances recent behavior with more history.

0.62

Correlation (5Y)
Shows whether the relationship held over a longer period.

0.71

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Sep 12, 2017

0.75

Over the past year, the correlation between CMALX and CDOFX has dropped to 0.50 - well below their long-term average of 0.75, suggesting their price drivers have been diverging.

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

CMALX vs. CDOFX — Risk / Return Rank

Compare historical risk-adjusted metric ranks over the past 12 months.

CMALX
CMALX Risk / Return Rank: 5858
Overall Rank
CMALX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 6161
Sharpe Ratio Rank
CMALX Sortino Ratio Rank: 6666
Sortino Ratio Rank
CMALX Omega Ratio Rank: 5555
Omega Ratio Rank
CMALX Calmar Ratio Rank: 6363
Calmar Ratio Rank
CMALX Martin Ratio Rank: 4848
Martin Ratio Rank

CDOFX
CDOFX Risk / Return Rank: 3333
Overall Rank
CDOFX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 3131
Sharpe Ratio Rank
CDOFX Sortino Ratio Rank: 3434
Sortino Ratio Rank
CDOFX Omega Ratio Rank: 3030
Omega Ratio Rank
CDOFX Calmar Ratio Rank: 3737
Calmar Ratio Rank
CDOFX Martin Ratio Rank: 3434
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) uses a weighted average of the Sharpe, Sortino, Omega, Calmar, and Martin percentile ranks for the trailing 12 months. Higher means stronger historical risk-adjusted performance within the peer group.

CMALX vs. CDOFX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Crawford Multi-Asset Income Fund (CMALX) and Crawford Small Cap Dividend Fund (CDOFX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.


CMALXCDOFXDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

+0.51

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

+0.67

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.28

1.20

+0.08

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

2.27

1.70

+0.56

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

7.18

5.38

+1.80

CMALX vs. CDOFX - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current CMALX Sharpe Ratio is 1.62, which is higher than the CDOFX Sharpe Ratio of 1.11. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of CMALX and CDOFX, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Drawdowns

CMALX vs. CDOFX - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum CMALX drawdown since its inception was -39.04%, roughly equal to the maximum CDOFX drawdown of -39.92%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for CMALX and CDOFX.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


CMALXCDOFXDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-39.04%

-39.92%

+0.88%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-4.49%

-10.95%

+6.46%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-7.61%

-24.11%

+16.50%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-12.68%

-24.11%

+11.43%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-39.92%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-1.65%

-1.33%

-0.32%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-3.70%

-6.06%

+2.36%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

1.41%

3.46%

-2.05%

Volatility

CMALX vs. CDOFX - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for Crawford Multi-Asset Income Fund (CMALX) is 2.39%, while Crawford Small Cap Dividend Fund (CDOFX) has a volatility of 4.39%. This indicates that CMALX experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than CDOFX based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


CMALXCDOFXDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

2.39%

4.39%

-2.00%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

4.95%

11.66%

-6.71%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

6.29%

16.85%

-10.56%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

8.98%

19.14%

-10.16%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

12.58%

20.59%

-8.01%

CMALX vs. CDOFX - Expense Ratio Comparison

CMALX has a 1.00% expense ratio, which is higher than CDOFX's 0.99% expense ratio.


Dividends

CMALX vs. CDOFX - Dividend Comparison

CMALX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 6.73%, more than CDOFX's 3.05% yield.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
CDOFX
Crawford Small Cap Dividend Fund
3.05%3.54%4.09%1.14%4.17%7.23%1.99%5.68%7.70%5.58%1.31%7.46%
CMALX
Crawford Multi-Asset Income Fund
6.73%7.61%3.94%4.66%4.93%3.21%3.67%5.07%4.87%0.99%0.00%0.00%

Frequently Asked Questions


CMALX and CDOFX have a correlation of 0.50, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

CDOFX has higher volatility (4.39%) compared to CMALX (2.39%). In terms of maximum drawdown, CMALX dropped -39.04% vs CDOFX's -39.92%.

CMALX currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (1.62 vs 1.11), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for CMALX and CDOFX

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer