PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
CMALX vs. FSRRX
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

CMALX vs. FSRRX - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Crawford Multi-Asset Income Fund (CMALX) and Fidelity Strategic Real Return Fund (FSRRX). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, CMALX achieves a 6.03% return, which is significantly lower than FSRRX's 6.54% return.


CMALX

1D
-0.11%
1M
-1.07%
YTD
6.03%
6M
6.36%
1Y
8.95%
3Y*
9.80%
5Y*
6.26%
10Y*

FSRRX

1D
-0.21%
1M
-1.67%
YTD
6.54%
6M
6.66%
1Y
12.46%
3Y*
8.78%
5Y*
6.10%
10Y*
5.34%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

CMALX vs. FSRRX - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
CMALX
Crawford Multi-Asset Income Fund
6.03%5.26%11.36%6.42%-0.99%15.89%-7.01%20.24%-4.85%0.14%
FSRRX
Fidelity Strategic Real Return Fund
6.54%10.45%5.84%4.59%-3.34%15.84%3.74%10.48%-3.99%0.56%

Correlation

The correlation between CMALX and FSRRX is 0.52, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.52

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.62

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.68

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Sep 12, 2017

0.67

The correlation between CMALX and FSRRX shifts across timeframes, from 0.52 (1 year) to 0.68 (5 years), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

CMALX vs. FSRRX — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

CMALX
CMALX Risk / Return Rank: 3333
Overall Rank
CMALX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 3434
Sharpe Ratio Rank
CMALX Sortino Ratio Rank: 3333
Sortino Ratio Rank
CMALX Omega Ratio Rank: 3131
Omega Ratio Rank
CMALX Calmar Ratio Rank: 3434
Calmar Ratio Rank
CMALX Martin Ratio Rank: 3131
Martin Ratio Rank

FSRRX
FSRRX Risk / Return Rank: 8787
Overall Rank
FSRRX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 8585
Sharpe Ratio Rank
FSRRX Sortino Ratio Rank: 8181
Sortino Ratio Rank
FSRRX Omega Ratio Rank: 8282
Omega Ratio Rank
FSRRX Calmar Ratio Rank: 9292
Calmar Ratio Rank
FSRRX Martin Ratio Rank: 9494
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

CMALX vs. FSRRX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Crawford Multi-Asset Income Fund (CMALX) and Fidelity Strategic Real Return Fund (FSRRX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.


CMALXFSRRXDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

-1.01

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

-1.30

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.27

1.49

-0.22

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

2.09

4.65

-2.56

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

6.63

19.13

-12.50

CMALX vs. FSRRX - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current CMALX Sharpe Ratio is 1.56, which is lower than the FSRRX Sharpe Ratio of 2.57. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of CMALX and FSRRX, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Drawdowns

CMALX vs. FSRRX - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum CMALX drawdown since its inception was -39.04%, which is greater than FSRRX's maximum drawdown of -33.42%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for CMALX and FSRRX.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


CMALXFSRRXDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-39.04%

-33.42%

-5.62%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-4.49%

-2.69%

-1.80%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-7.66%

-5.80%

-1.86%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-12.68%

-12.78%

+0.10%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-19.93%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-1.57%

-2.69%

+1.12%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-3.74%

-4.21%

+0.47%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

1.41%

0.65%

+0.76%

Volatility

CMALX vs. FSRRX - Volatility Comparison

Crawford Multi-Asset Income Fund (CMALX) has a higher volatility of 2.21% compared to Fidelity Strategic Real Return Fund (FSRRX) at 1.35%. This indicates that CMALX's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than FSRRX based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


CMALXFSRRXDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

2.21%

1.35%

+0.86%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

4.42%

3.81%

+0.61%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

6.00%

4.87%

+1.13%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

9.01%

6.88%

+2.13%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

12.62%

6.73%

+5.89%

CMALX vs. FSRRX - Expense Ratio Comparison

CMALX has a 1.00% expense ratio, which is higher than FSRRX's 0.70% expense ratio.


Dividends

CMALX vs. FSRRX - Dividend Comparison

CMALX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 7.35%, more than FSRRX's 4.21% yield.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
CMALX
Crawford Multi-Asset Income Fund
7.35%7.61%3.94%4.66%4.93%3.21%3.67%5.07%4.87%0.99%0.00%0.00%
FSRRX
Fidelity Strategic Real Return Fund
4.21%4.68%4.82%5.29%7.31%5.35%2.25%3.05%9.39%1.57%2.34%1.75%

Frequently Asked Questions


CMALX and FSRRX have a correlation of 0.52, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

CMALX has higher volatility (2.21%) compared to FSRRX (1.35%). In terms of maximum drawdown, CMALX dropped -39.04% vs FSRRX's -33.42%.

FSRRX currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.57 vs 1.56), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for CMALX and FSRRX

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer