PTRB vs. MAMB

Last updated Jun 4, 2026

PTRB (PGIM Total Return Bond ETF) and MAMB (Monarch Ambassador Income ETF) are both Intermediate Core-Plus Bond funds. PTRB is actively managed, while MAMB is passively managed. Over the past 3 years, PTRB returned 5.11%/yr vs 5.37%/yr for MAMB. Their correlation of 0.89 suggests significant overlap in exposure. PTRB charges 0.49%/yr vs 1.49%/yr for MAMB.

Performance

PTRB vs. MAMB - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in PGIM Total Return Bond ETF (PTRB) and Monarch Ambassador Income ETF (MAMB). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, PTRB achieves a 0.34% return, which is significantly lower than MAMB's 2.01% return.

PTRB

• 1D: -0.19%
• 1M: 0.28%
• YTD: 0.34%
• 6M: 0.41%
• 1Y: 5.81%
• 3Y*: 5.11%
• 5Y*: —
• 10Y*: —

MAMB

• 1D: -0.26%
• 1M: 0.63%
• YTD: 2.01%
• 6M: 1.90%
• 1Y: 9.37%
• 3Y*: 5.37%
• 5Y*: 0.72%
• 10Y*: —

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

PTRB vs. MAMB - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021
PTRB PGIM Total Return Bond ETF	0.34%	7.63%	2.67%	7.71%	-14.82%	-0.15%
MAMB Monarch Ambassador Income ETF	2.01%	10.69%	1.32%	4.90%	-13.02%	0.22%

Correlation

The correlation between PTRB and MAMB is 0.81, indicating a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Combining them offers limited diversification - they tend to fall together during downturns.

	Correlation
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	0.81
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period	0.87
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Dec 9, 2021	0.89

The correlation between PTRB and MAMB has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.81 to 0.89 - a consistent structural relationship.

PTRB vs. MAMB - Sectors Allocation Comparison

Sectors	PTRB	MAMB
Financial Services	4.2%	100.0%
Basic Materials	-	-
Communication Services	-	0.2%
Consumer Cyclical	-	1.1%
Consumer Defensive	-	-
Energy	-	-
Healthcare	-	19.5%
Industrials	-	8.5%
Real Estate	-	-
Technology	-	-
Utilities	-	70.8%

Return for Risk

PTRB vs. MAMB — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

PTRB

PTRB Risk / Return Rank: 40
PTRB Sharpe Ratio Rank: 41
PTRB Sortino Ratio Rank: 42
PTRB Omega Ratio Rank: 39
PTRB Calmar Ratio Rank: 41
PTRB Martin Ratio Rank: 38

MAMB

MAMB Risk / Return Rank: 48
MAMB Sharpe Ratio Rank: 48
MAMB Sortino Ratio Rank: 47
MAMB Omega Ratio Rank: 47
MAMB Calmar Ratio Rank: 53
MAMB Martin Ratio Rank: 46

The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

PTRB vs. MAMB - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for PGIM Total Return Bond ETF (PTRB) and Monarch Ambassador Income ETF (MAMB). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

	PTRB	MAMB	Difference
Sharpe ratio: Return per unit of total volatility	1.46	1.66	-0.20
Sortino ratio: Return per unit of downside risk	2.13	2.33	-0.19
Omega ratio: Gain probability vs. loss probability	1.26	1.29	-0.04
Calmar ratio: Return relative to maximum drawdown	2.01	2.65	-0.63
Martin ratio: Return relative to average drawdown	6.00	7.49	-1.48
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month.

PTRB vs. MAMB - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current PTRB Sharpe Ratio is 1.46, which is comparable to the MAMB Sharpe Ratio of 1.66. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of PTRB and MAMB, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.

Sharpe Ratios by Period

	PTRB	MAMB	Difference
Sharpe Ratio (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	1.46	1.66	-0.20
Sharpe Ratio (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period	—	0.10	—
Sharpe Ratio (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history	0.06	0.16	-0.11

Drawdowns

PTRB vs. MAMB - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum PTRB drawdown since its inception was -19.17%, roughly equal to the maximum MAMB drawdown of -19.33%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for PTRB and MAMB.

Drawdown Indicators

	PTRB	MAMB	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	-19.17%	-19.33%	+0.16%
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	-2.90%	-3.55%	+0.65%
Max Drawdown (3Y) Largest decline over 3 years	-5.52%	-7.38%	+1.86%
Max Drawdown (5Y) Largest decline over 5 years	—	-19.33%	—
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	-1.61%	-1.65%	+0.04%
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	-7.64%	-7.50%	-0.14%
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	0.97%	1.25%	-0.28%

Volatility

PTRB vs. MAMB - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for PGIM Total Return Bond ETF (PTRB) is 1.37%, while Monarch Ambassador Income ETF (MAMB) has a volatility of 1.72%. This indicates that PTRB experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than MAMB based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.

Volatility by Period

	PTRB	MAMB	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	1.37%	1.72%	-0.35%
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	2.83%	4.21%	-1.38%
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	4.01%	5.67%	-1.66%
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	6.25%	6.99%	-0.74%
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	6.25%	6.91%	-0.66%

PTRB vs. MAMB - Expense Ratio Comparison

PTRB has a 0.49% expense ratio, which is lower than MAMB's 1.49% expense ratio.

Dividends

PTRB vs. MAMB - Dividend Comparison

PTRB's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 4.74%, more than MAMB's 2.44% yield.

Position	TTM	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021
MAMB Monarch Ambassador Income ETF	2.44%	2.47%	2.11%	1.73%	0.92%	0.56%
PTRB PGIM Total Return Bond ETF	4.74%	4.73%	5.10%	4.62%	4.07%	0.12%

Frequently Asked Questions

Can I hold both PTRB and MAMB in my portfolio?

PTRB and MAMB have a correlation of 0.81, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

Which is riskier, PTRB or MAMB?

MAMB has higher volatility (1.72%) compared to PTRB (1.37%). In terms of maximum drawdown, PTRB dropped -19.17% vs MAMB's -19.33%.

Which ETF is better, PTRB or MAMB?

On 3-year performance, MAMB leads with 5.37% vs 5.11% for PTRB. On fees, PTRB is cheaper at 0.49% per year. On volatility, PTRB has been the lower-risk option at 1.37%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Which ETF has performed better, PTRB or MAMB?

Over the 3-year period, MAMB has performed better with a 5.37% return vs 5.11%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

Which ETF is cheaper, PTRB or MAMB?

PTRB is cheaper with a 0.49% expense ratio, compared with 1.49% for MAMB.

Which ETF pays a higher dividend yield, PTRB or MAMB?

PTRB has the higher dividend yield at 4.74%, compared with 2.44% for MAMB.

What is the main difference between PTRB and MAMB?

They also come from different issuers: PGIM and Monarch. Their fees differ too: 0.49% for PTRB and 1.49% for MAMB.

Which has better risk-adjusted returns?

MAMB currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (1.66 vs 1.46), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.