MAMB vs. ADFI

Last updated Jun 23, 2026

MAMB (Monarch Ambassador Income ETF) and ADFI (Anfield Dynamic Fixed Income ETF) are both Intermediate Core-Plus Bond funds. MAMB is passively managed, while ADFI is actively managed. Over the past 5 years, MAMB returned 0.72%/yr vs -0.18%/yr for ADFI. A 0.72 correlation means they provide meaningful diversification when combined. MAMB charges 1.49%/yr vs 1.75%/yr for ADFI.

Performance

MAMB vs. ADFI - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Monarch Ambassador Income ETF (MAMB) and Anfield Dynamic Fixed Income ETF (ADFI). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, MAMB achieves a 1.70% return, which is significantly higher than ADFI's 0.02% return.

MAMB

• 1D: -0.31%
• 1M: 0.33%
• YTD: 1.70%
• 6M: 1.42%
• 1Y: 8.14%
• 3Y*: 5.28%
• 5Y*: 0.72%
• 10Y*: —

ADFI

• 1D: -0.35%
• 1M: 0.50%
• YTD: 0.02%
• 6M: 0.31%
• 1Y: 2.70%
• 3Y*: 3.34%
• 5Y*: -0.18%
• 10Y*: —

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

MAMB vs. ADFI - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021
MAMB Monarch Ambassador Income ETF	1.70%	10.69%	1.32%	4.90%	-13.02%	1.17%
ADFI Anfield Dynamic Fixed Income ETF	0.02%	5.61%	0.51%	6.70%	-11.66%	-0.22%

Correlation

The correlation between MAMB and ADFI is 0.62, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.

	Correlation
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	0.62
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period	0.68
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period	0.72
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Mar 24, 2021	0.72

The correlation between MAMB and ADFI shifts across timeframes, from 0.62 (1 year) to 0.72 (5 years), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.

Return for Risk

MAMB vs. ADFI — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

MAMB

MAMB Risk / Return Rank: 42
MAMB Sharpe Ratio Rank: 41
MAMB Sortino Ratio Rank: 40
MAMB Omega Ratio Rank: 40
MAMB Calmar Ratio Rank: 48
MAMB Martin Ratio Rank: 40

ADFI

ADFI Risk / Return Rank: 20
ADFI Sharpe Ratio Rank: 18
ADFI Sortino Ratio Rank: 16
ADFI Omega Ratio Rank: 15
ADFI Calmar Ratio Rank: 23
ADFI Martin Ratio Rank: 24

The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

MAMB vs. ADFI - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Monarch Ambassador Income ETF (MAMB) and Anfield Dynamic Fixed Income ETF (ADFI). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.

	MAMB	ADFI	Difference
Sharpe ratio: Return per unit of total volatility	1.43	0.59	+0.83
Sortino ratio: Return per unit of downside risk	1.99	0.88	+1.12
Omega ratio: Gain probability vs. loss probability	1.25	1.10	+0.15
Calmar ratio: Return relative to maximum drawdown	2.30	1.09	+1.20
Martin ratio: Return relative to average drawdown	6.14	3.07	+3.07

MAMB vs. ADFI - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current MAMB Sharpe Ratio is 1.43, which is higher than the ADFI Sharpe Ratio of 0.59. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of MAMB and ADFI, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.

Drawdowns

MAMB vs. ADFI - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum MAMB drawdown since its inception was -19.33%, which is greater than ADFI's maximum drawdown of -17.62%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for MAMB and ADFI.

Drawdown Indicators

	MAMB	ADFI	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	-19.33%	-17.62%	-1.71%
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	-3.55%	-2.48%	-1.07%
Max Drawdown (3Y) Largest decline over 3 years	-7.38%	-5.60%	-1.78%
Max Drawdown (5Y) Largest decline over 5 years	-19.33%	-16.11%	-3.22%
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	-1.95%	-3.61%	+1.66%
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	-7.45%	-7.57%	+0.12%
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	1.33%	0.88%	+0.45%

Volatility

MAMB vs. ADFI - Volatility Comparison

Monarch Ambassador Income ETF (MAMB) has a higher volatility of 1.71% compared to Anfield Dynamic Fixed Income ETF (ADFI) at 1.15%. This indicates that MAMB's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than ADFI based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.

Volatility by Period

	MAMB	ADFI	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	1.71%	1.15%	+0.56%
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	4.42%	2.89%	+1.53%
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	5.74%	4.59%	+1.15%
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	7.02%	6.20%	+0.82%
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	6.91%	5.87%	+1.04%

MAMB vs. ADFI - Expense Ratio Comparison

MAMB has a 1.49% expense ratio, which is lower than ADFI's 1.75% expense ratio.

Dividends

MAMB vs. ADFI - Dividend Comparison

MAMB's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 2.45%, less than ADFI's 3.23% yield.

Position	TTM	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020
ADFI Anfield Dynamic Fixed Income ETF	3.23%	3.30%	3.17%	2.90%	1.60%	0.80%	0.50%
MAMB Monarch Ambassador Income ETF	2.45%	2.47%	2.11%	1.73%	0.92%	0.56%	0.00%

Frequently Asked Questions

Can I hold both MAMB and ADFI in my portfolio?

MAMB and ADFI have a correlation of 0.62, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

Which is riskier, MAMB or ADFI?

MAMB has higher volatility (1.71%) compared to ADFI (1.15%). In terms of maximum drawdown, MAMB dropped -19.33% vs ADFI's -17.62%.

Which ETF is better, MAMB or ADFI?

On 5-year performance, MAMB leads with 0.72% vs -0.18% for ADFI. On fees, MAMB is cheaper at 1.49% per year. On volatility, ADFI has been the lower-risk option at 1.15%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Which ETF has performed better, MAMB or ADFI?

Over the 5-year period, MAMB has performed better with a 0.72% return vs -0.18%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

Which ETF is cheaper, MAMB or ADFI?

MAMB is cheaper with a 1.49% expense ratio, compared with 1.75% for ADFI.

Which ETF pays a higher dividend yield, MAMB or ADFI?

ADFI has the higher dividend yield at 3.23%, compared with 2.45% for MAMB.

What is the main difference between MAMB and ADFI?

They also come from different issuers: Monarch and Anfield. Their fees differ too: 1.49% for MAMB and 1.75% for ADFI.

Which has better risk-adjusted returns?

MAMB currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (1.43 vs 0.59), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.