PTMC vs. VFMV
PTMC (Pacer Trendpilot US Mid Cap ETF) and VFMV (Vanguard U.S. Minimum Volatility ETF) are both Mid Cap Blend Equities funds. PTMC is passively managed, while VFMV is actively managed. Over the past 5 years, PTMC returned 3.47%/yr vs 9.71%/yr for VFMV. A 0.60 correlation means they provide meaningful diversification when combined. PTMC charges 0.60%/yr vs 0.13%/yr for VFMV.
Performance
PTMC vs. VFMV - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, PTMC achieves a 12.33% return, which is significantly higher than VFMV's 7.98% return.
PTMC
- 1D
- -1.91%
- 1M
- -0.87%
- YTD
- 12.33%
- 6M
- 11.93%
- 1Y
- 17.22%
- 3Y*
- 9.60%
- 5Y*
- 3.47%
- 10Y*
- 5.91%
VFMV
- 1D
- -0.71%
- 1M
- 0.36%
- YTD
- 7.98%
- 6M
- 7.43%
- 1Y
- 12.94%
- 3Y*
- 14.52%
- 5Y*
- 9.71%
- 10Y*
- —
PTMC vs. VFMV - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
PTMC Pacer Trendpilot US Mid Cap ETF | 12.33% | -1.55% | 13.22% | 7.29% | -13.99% | 12.42% | 6.58% | 1.04% | 0.19% |
VFMV Vanguard U.S. Minimum Volatility ETF | 7.98% | 10.52% | 16.91% | 8.86% | -5.73% | 20.75% | -0.19% | 27.26% | -1.10% |
Correlation
The correlation between PTMC and VFMV is 0.75, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.75 |
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period | 0.69 |
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.61 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Feb 16, 2018 | 0.60 |
The correlation between PTMC and VFMV shifts across timeframes, from 0.60 (all time) to 0.75 (1 year), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.
PTMC vs. VFMV - Sectors Allocation Comparison
Sectors
PTMC
VFMV
Industrials
Technology
Financial Services
Consumer Cyclical
Healthcare
Real Estate
Basic Materials
-
Consumer Defensive
Energy
Utilities
Communication Services
Industrials
PTMC
VFMV
Technology
PTMC
VFMV
Financial Services
PTMC
VFMV
Consumer Cyclical
PTMC
VFMV
Healthcare
PTMC
VFMV
Real Estate
PTMC
VFMV
Basic Materials
PTMC
VFMV
-
Consumer Defensive
PTMC
VFMV
Energy
PTMC
VFMV
Utilities
PTMC
VFMV
Communication Services
PTMC
VFMV
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
PTMC vs. VFMV — Risk / Return Rank
PTMC
VFMV
PTMC vs. VFMV - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Pacer Trendpilot US Mid Cap ETF (PTMC) and Vanguard U.S. Minimum Volatility ETF (VFMV). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| PTMC | VFMV | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | -0.34 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | -0.42 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.21 | 1.26 | -0.05 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 1.94 | 2.16 | -0.22 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 7.12 | 8.48 | -1.36 |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading charts...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| PTMC | VFMV | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 1.13 | 1.47 | -0.34 |
Sharpe Ratio (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.26 | 0.83 | -0.57 |
Sharpe Ratio (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | 0.46 | — | — |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 0.50 | 0.69 | -0.19 |
Drawdowns
PTMC vs. VFMV - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum PTMC drawdown since its inception was -20.53%, smaller than the maximum VFMV drawdown of -33.64%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for PTMC and VFMV.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| PTMC | VFMV | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -20.53% | -33.64% | +13.11% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -8.89% | -6.00% | -2.89% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -15.31% | -10.35% | -4.96% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -16.93% | -15.41% | -1.52% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -20.53% | — | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -1.91% | -1.52% | -0.39% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -6.47% | -3.63% | -2.84% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 2.42% | 1.53% | +0.89% |
Volatility
PTMC vs. VFMV - Volatility Comparison
Pacer Trendpilot US Mid Cap ETF (PTMC) has a higher volatility of 4.36% compared to Vanguard U.S. Minimum Volatility ETF (VFMV) at 2.17%. This indicates that PTMC's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than VFMV based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| PTMC | VFMV | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 4.36% | 2.17% | +2.19% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 11.59% | 6.34% | +5.25% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 15.30% | 8.83% | +6.47% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 13.17% | 11.75% | +1.42% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 12.99% | 14.25% | -1.26% |
PTMC vs. VFMV - Expense Ratio Comparison
PTMC has a 0.60% expense ratio, which is higher than VFMV's 0.13% expense ratio.
Dividends
PTMC vs. VFMV - Dividend Comparison
PTMC's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 1.64%, less than VFMV's 1.94% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
PTMC Pacer Trendpilot US Mid Cap ETF | 1.64% | 1.84% | 0.87% | 1.92% | 0.82% | 0.12% | 0.53% | 1.40% | 0.89% | 0.67% | 0.66% |
VFMV Vanguard U.S. Minimum Volatility ETF | 1.94% | 2.12% | 1.46% | 2.20% | 2.08% | 1.31% | 2.14% | 2.43% | 2.29% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
Frequently Asked Questions
PTMC and VFMV have a correlation of 0.75, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
PTMC has higher volatility (4.36%) compared to VFMV (2.17%). In terms of maximum drawdown, PTMC dropped -20.53% vs VFMV's -33.64%.
On 5-year performance, VFMV leads with 9.71% vs 3.47% for PTMC. On fees, VFMV is cheaper at 0.13% per year. On volatility, VFMV has been the lower-risk option at 2.17%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
Over the 5-year period, VFMV has performed better with a 9.71% return vs 3.47%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.
VFMV is cheaper with a 0.13% expense ratio, compared with 0.60% for PTMC.
VFMV has the higher dividend yield at 1.94%, compared with 1.64% for PTMC.
They also come from different issuers: Pacer and Vanguard. Their fees differ too: 0.60% for PTMC and 0.13% for VFMV.
VFMV currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (1.47 vs 1.13), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for PTMC and VFMV
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer