PTMC vs. QIDX

Last updated Jun 23, 2026

PTMC (Pacer Trendpilot US Mid Cap ETF) and QIDX (Indexperts Quality Earnings Focused ETF) are both Mid Cap Blend Equities funds. PTMC is passively managed, while QIDX is actively managed. Over the past year, PTMC returned 20.66% vs 14.00% for QIDX. A 0.69 correlation means they provide meaningful diversification when combined. PTMC charges 0.60%/yr vs 0.50%/yr for QIDX.

Performance

PTMC vs. QIDX - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Pacer Trendpilot US Mid Cap ETF (PTMC) and Indexperts Quality Earnings Focused ETF (QIDX). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, PTMC achieves a 15.78% return, which is significantly higher than QIDX's 8.19% return.

PTMC

• 1D: 0.36%
• 1M: 3.72%
• YTD: 15.78%
• 6M: 13.34%
• 1Y: 20.66%
• 3Y*: 11.12%
• 5Y*: 4.32%
• 10Y*: 6.66%

QIDX

• 1D: 0.09%
• 1M: 1.61%
• YTD: 8.19%
• 6M: 7.35%
• 1Y: 14.00%
• 3Y*: —
• 5Y*: —
• 10Y*: —

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

PTMC vs. QIDX - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)	2025
PTMC Pacer Trendpilot US Mid Cap ETF	15.78%	-1.55%
QIDX Indexperts Quality Earnings Focused ETF	8.19%	6.60%

Correlation

The correlation between PTMC and QIDX is 0.83, indicating a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Combining them offers limited diversification - they tend to fall together during downturns.

	Correlation
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	0.83
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Jan 2, 2025	0.69

The correlation between PTMC and QIDX shifts across timeframes, from 0.69 (all time) to 0.83 (1 year), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.

Return for Risk

PTMC vs. QIDX — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

PTMC

PTMC Risk / Return Rank: 43
PTMC Sharpe Ratio Rank: 39
PTMC Sortino Ratio Rank: 40
PTMC Omega Ratio Rank: 37
PTMC Calmar Ratio Rank: 49
PTMC Martin Ratio Rank: 51

QIDX

QIDX Risk / Return Rank: 38
QIDX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 36
QIDX Sortino Ratio Rank: 37
QIDX Omega Ratio Rank: 34
QIDX Calmar Ratio Rank: 42
QIDX Martin Ratio Rank: 43

The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

PTMC vs. QIDX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Pacer Trendpilot US Mid Cap ETF (PTMC) and Indexperts Quality Earnings Focused ETF (QIDX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.

	PTMC	QIDX	Difference
Sharpe ratio: Return per unit of total volatility	1.33	1.26	+0.06
Sortino ratio: Return per unit of downside risk	1.99	1.86	+0.12
Omega ratio: Gain probability vs. loss probability	1.24	1.22	+0.02
Calmar ratio: Return relative to maximum drawdown	2.33	2.03	+0.30
Martin ratio: Return relative to average drawdown	8.51	6.72	+1.79

PTMC vs. QIDX - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current PTMC Sharpe Ratio is 1.33, which is comparable to the QIDX Sharpe Ratio of 1.26. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of PTMC and QIDX, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.

Drawdowns

PTMC vs. QIDX - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum PTMC drawdown since its inception was -20.53%, which is greater than QIDX's maximum drawdown of -14.99%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for PTMC and QIDX.

Drawdown Indicators

	PTMC	QIDX	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	-20.53%	-14.99%	-5.54%
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	-8.89%	-6.92%	-1.97%
Max Drawdown (3Y) Largest decline over 3 years	-15.31%	—	—
Max Drawdown (5Y) Largest decline over 5 years	-16.93%	—	—
Max Drawdown (10Y) Largest decline over 10 years	-20.53%	—	—
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	-0.07%	-0.97%	+0.90%
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	-6.45%	-2.24%	-4.21%
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	2.43%	2.09%	+0.34%

Volatility

PTMC vs. QIDX - Volatility Comparison

Pacer Trendpilot US Mid Cap ETF (PTMC) has a higher volatility of 4.38% compared to Indexperts Quality Earnings Focused ETF (QIDX) at 2.99%. This indicates that PTMC's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than QIDX based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.

Volatility by Period

	PTMC	QIDX	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	4.38%	2.99%	+1.39%
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	11.74%	8.53%	+3.21%
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	15.69%	11.17%	+4.52%
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	13.24%	14.56%	-1.32%
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	13.02%	14.56%	-1.54%

PTMC vs. QIDX - Expense Ratio Comparison

PTMC has a 0.60% expense ratio, which is higher than QIDX's 0.50% expense ratio.

Dividends

PTMC vs. QIDX - Dividend Comparison

PTMC's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 1.59%, more than QIDX's 0.85% yield.

Position	TTM	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020	2019	2018	2017	2016
PTMC Pacer Trendpilot US Mid Cap ETF	1.59%	1.84%	0.87%	1.92%	0.82%	0.12%	0.53%	1.40%	0.89%	0.67%	0.66%
QIDX Indexperts Quality Earnings Focused ETF	0.85%	0.84%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%

Frequently Asked Questions

Can I hold both PTMC and QIDX in my portfolio?

PTMC and QIDX have a correlation of 0.83, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

Which is riskier, PTMC or QIDX?

PTMC has higher volatility (4.38%) compared to QIDX (2.99%). In terms of maximum drawdown, PTMC dropped -20.53% vs QIDX's -14.99%.

Which ETF is better, PTMC or QIDX?

On 1-year performance, PTMC leads with 20.66% vs 14.00% for QIDX. On fees, QIDX is cheaper at 0.50% per year. On volatility, QIDX has been the lower-risk option at 2.99%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Which ETF has performed better, PTMC or QIDX?

Over the 1-year period, PTMC has performed better with a 20.66% return vs 14.00%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

Which ETF is cheaper, PTMC or QIDX?

QIDX is cheaper with a 0.50% expense ratio, compared with 0.60% for PTMC.

Which ETF pays a higher dividend yield, PTMC or QIDX?

PTMC has the higher dividend yield at 1.59%, compared with 0.85% for QIDX.

What is the main difference between PTMC and QIDX?

They also come from different issuers: Pacer and Indexperts. Their fees differ too: 0.60% for PTMC and 0.50% for QIDX.

Which has better risk-adjusted returns?

PTMC currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (1.33 vs 1.26), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.