PTMC vs. MOO
PTMC (Pacer Trendpilot US Mid Cap ETF) and MOO (VanEck Agribusiness ETF) are both exchange-traded funds - PTMC is a Mid Cap Blend Equities fund tracking the Pacer Trendpilot US Mid Cap Index, while MOO is a Large Cap Blend Equities fund tracking the MVIS Global Agribusiness Index. Both are passively managed. Over the past 10 years, PTMC returned 7.02%/yr vs 7.65%/yr for MOO. A 0.58 correlation means they provide meaningful diversification when combined. PTMC charges 0.60%/yr vs 0.55%/yr for MOO.
Performance
PTMC vs. MOO - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, PTMC achieves a 16.10% return, which is significantly higher than MOO's 8.93% return. Over the past 10 years, PTMC has underperformed MOO with an annualized return of 7.02%, while MOO has yielded a comparatively higher 7.65% annualized return.
PTMC
- 1D
- 0.71%
- 1M
- 2.46%
- YTD
- 16.10%
- 6M
- 13.77%
- 1Y
- 20.99%
- 3Y*
- 10.89%
- 5Y*
- 4.15%
- 10Y*
- 7.02%
MOO
- 1D
- 2.76%
- 1M
- -1.10%
- YTD
- 8.93%
- 6M
- 9.02%
- 1Y
- 11.52%
- 3Y*
- 2.23%
- 5Y*
- -0.43%
- 10Y*
- 7.65%
PTMC vs. MOO - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
PTMC Pacer Trendpilot US Mid Cap ETF | 16.10% | -1.55% | 13.22% | 7.29% | -13.99% | 12.42% | 6.58% | 1.04% | 0.02% | 17.79% |
MOO VanEck Agribusiness ETF | 8.93% | 15.61% | -12.43% | -8.57% | -8.10% | 23.99% | 14.59% | 22.29% | -6.03% | 21.75% |
Correlation
The correlation between PTMC and MOO is 0.51, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.51 |
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period | 0.55 |
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.53 |
Correlation (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | 0.58 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Jan 4, 2016 | 0.58 |
The correlation between PTMC and MOO has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.51 to 0.58 - a consistent structural relationship.
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
PTMC vs. MOO — Risk / Return Rank
PTMC
MOO
PTMC vs. MOO - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Pacer Trendpilot US Mid Cap ETF (PTMC) and VanEck Agribusiness ETF (MOO). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.
| PTMC | MOO | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | +0.53 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | +0.76 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.24 | 1.15 | +0.10 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 2.37 | 1.04 | +1.33 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 8.64 | 2.82 | +5.81 |
Loading charts...
Drawdowns
PTMC vs. MOO - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum PTMC drawdown since its inception was -20.53%, smaller than the maximum MOO drawdown of -69.53%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for PTMC and MOO.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| PTMC | MOO | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -20.53% | -69.53% | +49.00% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -8.89% | -11.17% | +2.28% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -15.31% | -26.83% | +11.52% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -16.93% | -39.52% | +22.59% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -20.53% | -39.52% | +18.99% |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | 0.00% | -18.37% | +18.37% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -6.44% | -16.97% | +10.53% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 2.44% | 4.09% | -1.65% |
Volatility
PTMC vs. MOO - Volatility Comparison
Pacer Trendpilot US Mid Cap ETF (PTMC) and VanEck Agribusiness ETF (MOO) have volatilities of 4.36% and 4.54%, respectively, indicating that both stocks experience similar levels of price fluctuations. This suggests that the risk associated with both stocks, as measured by volatility, is nearly the same. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| PTMC | MOO | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 4.36% | 4.54% | -0.18% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 11.78% | 11.17% | +0.61% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 15.72% | 14.34% | +1.38% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 13.25% | 17.17% | -3.92% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 12.97% | 18.16% | -5.19% |
PTMC vs. MOO - Expense Ratio Comparison
PTMC has a 0.60% expense ratio, which is higher than MOO's 0.55% expense ratio.
Dividends
PTMC vs. MOO - Dividend Comparison
PTMC's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 1.59%, less than MOO's 2.27% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
MOO VanEck Agribusiness ETF | 2.27% | 2.47% | 3.41% | 2.93% | 2.15% | 1.17% | 1.10% | 1.26% | 1.69% | 1.44% | 2.14% | 2.89% |
PTMC Pacer Trendpilot US Mid Cap ETF | 1.59% | 1.84% | 0.87% | 1.92% | 0.82% | 0.12% | 0.53% | 1.40% | 0.89% | 0.67% | 0.66% | 0.00% |
Frequently Asked Questions
PTMC and MOO have a correlation of 0.51, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
MOO has higher volatility (4.54%) compared to PTMC (4.36%). In terms of maximum drawdown, PTMC dropped -20.53% vs MOO's -69.53%.
On 10-year performance, MOO leads with 7.65% vs 7.02% for PTMC. On fees, MOO is cheaper at 0.55% per year. On volatility, PTMC has been the lower-risk option at 4.36%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
Over the 10-year period, MOO has performed better with a 7.65% return vs 7.02%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.
MOO is cheaper with a 0.55% expense ratio, compared with 0.60% for PTMC.
MOO has the higher dividend yield at 2.27%, compared with 1.59% for PTMC.
PTMC is categorized as Mid Cap Blend Equities, while MOO is Large Cap Blend Equities. PTMC tracks Pacer Trendpilot US Mid Cap Index, while MOO tracks MVIS Global Agribusiness Index. They also come from different issuers: Pacer and VanEck. Their fees differ too: 0.60% for PTMC and 0.55% for MOO.
PTMC currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (1.34 vs 0.81), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for PTMC and MOO
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer