PTMC vs. GRNJ

Last updated Jun 6, 2026

PTMC (Pacer Trendpilot US Mid Cap ETF) and GRNJ (Fundstrat Granny Shots US Small- & Mid-Cap ETF) are both Mid Cap Blend Equities funds. PTMC is passively managed, while GRNJ is actively managed. Their correlation of 0.81 suggests significant overlap in exposure. PTMC charges 0.60%/yr vs 0.75%/yr for GRNJ.

Performance

PTMC vs. GRNJ - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Pacer Trendpilot US Mid Cap ETF (PTMC) and Fundstrat Granny Shots US Small- & Mid-Cap ETF (GRNJ). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, PTMC achieves a 12.33% return, which is significantly lower than GRNJ's 19.84% return.

PTMC

• 1D: -1.91%
• 1M: -0.87%
• YTD: 12.33%
• 6M: 11.93%
• 1Y: 17.22%
• 3Y*: 9.60%
• 5Y*: 3.47%
• 10Y*: 5.91%

GRNJ

• 1D: -5.87%
• 1M: -1.42%
• YTD: 19.84%
• 6M: 15.85%
• 1Y: —
• 3Y*: —
• 5Y*: —
• 10Y*: —

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

PTMC vs. GRNJ - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)	2025
PTMC Pacer Trendpilot US Mid Cap ETF	12.33%	4.87%
GRNJ Fundstrat Granny Shots US Small- & Mid-Cap ETF	19.84%	5.14%

Correlation

The correlation between PTMC and GRNJ is 0.81, indicating a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Combining them offers limited diversification - they tend to fall together during downturns.

	Correlation
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Nov 19, 2025	0.81

Return for Risk

PTMC vs. GRNJ — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

PTMC

PTMC Risk / Return Rank: 38
PTMC Sharpe Ratio Rank: 33
PTMC Sortino Ratio Rank: 35
PTMC Omega Ratio Rank: 34
PTMC Calmar Ratio Rank: 42
PTMC Martin Ratio Rank: 46

The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

PTMC vs. GRNJ - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Pacer Trendpilot US Mid Cap ETF (PTMC) and Fundstrat Granny Shots US Small- & Mid-Cap ETF (GRNJ). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

	PTMC	GRNJ	Difference
Sharpe ratio: Return per unit of total volatility	1.13	—	—
Sortino ratio: Return per unit of downside risk	1.72	—	—
Omega ratio: Gain probability vs. loss probability	1.21	—	—
Calmar ratio: Return relative to maximum drawdown	1.94	—	—
Martin ratio: Return relative to average drawdown	7.12	—	—
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month.

Sharpe Ratios by Period

	PTMC	GRNJ	Difference
Sharpe Ratio (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	1.13	—	—
Sharpe Ratio (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period	0.26	—	—
Sharpe Ratio (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period	0.46	—	—
Sharpe Ratio (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history	0.50	1.74	-1.24

Drawdowns

PTMC vs. GRNJ - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum PTMC drawdown since its inception was -20.53%, which is greater than GRNJ's maximum drawdown of -17.32%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for PTMC and GRNJ.

Drawdown Indicators

	PTMC	GRNJ	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	-20.53%	-17.32%	-3.21%
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	-8.89%	—	—
Max Drawdown (3Y) Largest decline over 3 years	-15.31%	—	—
Max Drawdown (5Y) Largest decline over 5 years	-16.93%	—	—
Max Drawdown (10Y) Largest decline over 10 years	-20.53%	—	—
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	-1.91%	-6.07%	+4.16%
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	-6.47%	-4.11%	-2.36%
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	2.42%	—	—

Volatility

Volatility by Period

	PTMC	GRNJ	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	4.36%	—	—
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	11.59%	—	—
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	15.30%	30.86%	-15.56%
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	13.17%	30.86%	-17.69%
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	12.99%	30.86%	-17.87%

PTMC vs. GRNJ - Expense Ratio Comparison

PTMC has a 0.60% expense ratio, which is lower than GRNJ's 0.75% expense ratio.

Dividends

PTMC vs. GRNJ - Dividend Comparison

PTMC's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 1.64%, while GRNJ has not paid dividends to shareholders.

Position	TTM	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020	2019	2018	2017	2016
GRNJ Fundstrat Granny Shots US Small- & Mid-Cap ETF	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%
PTMC Pacer Trendpilot US Mid Cap ETF	1.64%	1.84%	0.87%	1.92%	0.82%	0.12%	0.53%	1.40%	0.89%	0.67%	0.66%

Frequently Asked Questions

Can I hold both PTMC and GRNJ in my portfolio?

PTMC and GRNJ have a correlation of 0.81, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

Which ETF is better, PTMC or GRNJ?

On fees, PTMC is cheaper at 0.60% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Which ETF is cheaper, PTMC or GRNJ?

PTMC is cheaper with a 0.60% expense ratio, compared with 0.75% for GRNJ.

Which ETF pays a higher dividend yield, PTMC or GRNJ?

PTMC has the higher dividend yield at 1.64%, compared with 0.00% for GRNJ.

What is the main difference between PTMC and GRNJ?

They also come from different issuers: Pacer and Fundstrat. Their fees differ too: 0.60% for PTMC and 0.75% for GRNJ.