PTMC vs. DRES

Last updated Aug 2, 2026

PTMC (Pacer Trendpilot US Mid Cap ETF) and DRES (GMO Domestic Resilience ETF) are both Mid Cap Blend Equities funds. PTMC is passively managed, while DRES is actively managed. Their correlation of 0.84 means they have usually moved in the same direction. PTMC charges 0.60%/yr vs 0.50%/yr for DRES.

Performance

PTMC vs. DRES - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Pacer Trendpilot US Mid Cap ETF (PTMC) and GMO Domestic Resilience ETF (DRES). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, PTMC achieves a 14.38% return, which is significantly lower than DRES's 21.60% return.

PTMC

• 1D: -0.17%
• 1M: -1.07%
• 6M: 9.97%
• YTD: 14.38%
• 1Y: 22.36%
• 3Y*: 7.75%
• 5Y*: 3.92%
• 10Y*: 5.96%
• ALL TIME*: 6.45%

DRES

• 1D: 0.30%
• 1M: 0.31%
• 6M: 12.48%
• YTD: 21.60%
• 1Y: —
• 3Y*: —
• 5Y*: —
• 10Y*: —
• ALL TIME*: —

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

Liquidity Comparison

Position	Avg. Volume Value (2W)	Avg. Volume Value (1M)	Avg. Volume Value (3M)
DRES GMO Domestic Resilience ETF	$93.72K	$76.15K	$99.36K
PTMC Pacer Trendpilot US Mid Cap ETF	$761.40K	$807.29K	$859.13K

PTMC vs. DRES - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)	2025
PTMC Pacer Trendpilot US Mid Cap ETF	14.38%	1.42%
DRES GMO Domestic Resilience ETF	21.60%	2.50%

Correlation

The correlation between PTMC and DRES is 0.84, meaning they have usually moved in the same direction, including during past declines.

	Correlation
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Oct 1, 2025	0.84

Return for Risk

PTMC vs. DRES — Risk / Return Rank

Compare historical risk-adjusted metric ranks over the past 12 months.

PTMC

PTMC Risk / Return Rank: 60
PTMC Sharpe Ratio Rank: 54
PTMC Sortino Ratio Rank: 57
PTMC Omega Ratio Rank: 53
PTMC Calmar Ratio Rank: 66
PTMC Martin Ratio Rank: 69

DRES

Risk / return metrics aren't available yet — we need at least 12 months of trading data to calculate them.

The rank (0–100) uses a weighted average of the Sharpe, Sortino, Omega, Calmar, and Martin percentile ranks for the trailing 12 months. Higher means stronger historical risk-adjusted performance within the peer group.

PTMC vs. DRES - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Pacer Trendpilot US Mid Cap ETF (PTMC) and GMO Domestic Resilience ETF (DRES). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.

	PTMC	DRES	Difference
Sharpe ratio: Return per unit of total volatility	1.31	—	—
Sortino ratio: Return per unit of downside risk	1.96	—	—
Omega ratio: Gain probability vs. loss probability	1.24	—	—
Calmar ratio: Return relative to maximum drawdown	2.32	—	—
Martin ratio: Return relative to average drawdown	8.40	—	—

Drawdowns

PTMC vs. DRES - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum PTMC drawdown since its inception was -20.53%, which is greater than DRES's maximum drawdown of -10.41%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for PTMC and DRES.

Drawdown Indicators

	PTMC	DRES	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	-20.53%	-10.41%	-10.12%
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	-8.89%	—	—
Max Drawdown (3Y) Largest decline over 3 years	-15.31%	—	—
Max Drawdown (5Y) Largest decline over 5 years	-16.93%	—	—
Max Drawdown (10Y) Largest decline over 10 years	-20.53%	—	—
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	-2.46%	-1.59%	-0.87%
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	-6.40%	-2.14%	-4.26%
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	2.45%	—	—

Volatility

Volatility by Period

	PTMC	DRES	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	3.47%	—	—
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	11.64%	—	—
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	15.77%	18.07%	-2.30%
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	13.27%	18.07%	-4.80%
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	12.92%	18.07%	-5.15%

PTMC vs. DRES - Expense Ratio Comparison

PTMC has a 0.60% expense ratio, which is higher than DRES's 0.50% expense ratio.

Dividends

PTMC vs. DRES - Dividend Comparison

PTMC's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 1.61%, more than DRES's 0.52% yield.

Position	TTM	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020	2019	2018	2017	2016
DRES GMO Domestic Resilience ETF	0.52%	0.22%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%
PTMC Pacer Trendpilot US Mid Cap ETF	1.61%	1.84%	0.87%	1.92%	0.82%	0.12%	0.53%	1.40%	0.89%	0.67%	0.66%

Frequently Asked Questions

Can I hold both PTMC and DRES in my portfolio?

PTMC and DRES have a correlation of 0.84, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

Which ETF is better, PTMC or DRES?

On fees, DRES is cheaper at 0.50% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Which ETF is cheaper, PTMC or DRES?

DRES is cheaper with a 0.50% expense ratio, compared with 0.60% for PTMC.

Which ETF pays a higher dividend yield, PTMC or DRES?

PTMC has the higher dividend yield at 1.61%, compared with 0.52% for DRES.

What is the main difference between PTMC and DRES?

They also come from different issuers: Pacer and GMO. Their fees differ too: 0.60% for PTMC and 0.50% for DRES.