PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
PTLC vs. TRND
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

PTLC vs. TRND - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Pacer Trendpilot US Large Cap ETF (PTLC) and Pacer Trendpilot Fund of Funds ETF (TRND). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, PTLC achieves a 5.53% return, which is significantly lower than TRND's 10.17% return.


PTLC

1D
-0.74%
1M
4.98%
YTD
5.53%
6M
5.49%
1Y
21.41%
3Y*
14.93%
5Y*
10.72%
10Y*
11.26%

TRND

1D
-0.38%
1M
5.38%
YTD
10.17%
6M
10.19%
1Y
21.66%
3Y*
11.89%
5Y*
6.25%
10Y*
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

PTLC vs. TRND - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)2025202420232022202120202019
PTLC
Pacer Trendpilot US Large Cap ETF
5.53%5.10%24.31%16.78%-8.62%27.90%-1.15%11.21%
TRND
Pacer Trendpilot Fund of Funds ETF
10.17%6.03%11.97%16.48%-15.37%12.95%4.73%7.79%

Correlation

The correlation between PTLC and TRND is 0.95, indicating a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Combining them offers limited diversification - they tend to fall together during downturns.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.95

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.92

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.86

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since May 7, 2019

0.88

The correlation between PTLC and TRND has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.86 to 0.95 - a consistent structural relationship.

PTLC vs. TRND - Sectors Allocation Comparison


Sectors
PTLC
TRND

Technology

35.6%
30.6%

Financial Services

11.8%
13.2%

Communication Services

11.2%
7.7%

Consumer Cyclical

10.1%
10.0%

Healthcare

8.5%
7.4%

Industrials

8.3%
13.4%

Consumer Defensive

4.9%
5.5%

Energy

3.5%
3.8%

Utilities

2.3%
2.3%

Real Estate

1.9%
2.7%

Basic Materials

1.8%
3.4%

Technology

PTLC
35.6%
TRND
30.6%

Financial Services

PTLC
11.8%
TRND
13.2%

Communication Services

PTLC
11.2%
TRND
7.7%

Consumer Cyclical

PTLC
10.1%
TRND
10.0%

Healthcare

PTLC
8.5%
TRND
7.4%

Industrials

PTLC
8.3%
TRND
13.4%

Consumer Defensive

PTLC
4.9%
TRND
5.5%

Energy

PTLC
3.5%
TRND
3.8%

Utilities

PTLC
2.3%
TRND
2.3%

Real Estate

PTLC
1.9%
TRND
2.7%

Basic Materials

PTLC
1.8%
TRND
3.4%

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

PTLC vs. TRND — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

PTLC
PTLC Risk / Return Rank: 5353
Overall Rank
PTLC Sharpe Ratio Rank: 5555
Sharpe Ratio Rank
PTLC Sortino Ratio Rank: 5252
Sortino Ratio Rank
PTLC Omega Ratio Rank: 5454
Omega Ratio Rank
PTLC Calmar Ratio Rank: 4949
Calmar Ratio Rank
PTLC Martin Ratio Rank: 5656
Martin Ratio Rank

TRND
TRND Risk / Return Rank: 5858
Overall Rank
TRND Sharpe Ratio Rank: 5757
Sharpe Ratio Rank
TRND Sortino Ratio Rank: 5858
Sortino Ratio Rank
TRND Omega Ratio Rank: 5757
Omega Ratio Rank
TRND Calmar Ratio Rank: 5555
Calmar Ratio Rank
TRND Martin Ratio Rank: 6464
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

PTLC vs. TRND - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Pacer Trendpilot US Large Cap ETF (PTLC) and Pacer Trendpilot Fund of Funds ETF (TRND). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


PTLCTRNDDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

-0.03

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

-0.20

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.34

1.35

-0.01

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

2.45

2.72

-0.27

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

9.71

11.41

-1.70

PTLC vs. TRND - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current PTLC Sharpe Ratio is 1.91, which is comparable to the TRND Sharpe Ratio of 1.94. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of PTLC and TRND, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


PTLCTRNDDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

1.91

1.94

-0.03

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.92

0.65

+0.27

Sharpe Ratio (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.86

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

0.70

0.65

+0.05

Drawdowns

PTLC vs. TRND - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum PTLC drawdown since its inception was -26.63%, which is greater than TRND's maximum drawdown of -17.88%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for PTLC and TRND.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


PTLCTRNDDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-26.63%

-17.88%

-8.75%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-8.77%

-8.00%

-0.77%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-15.17%

-9.56%

-5.61%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-15.17%

-16.21%

+1.04%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-26.63%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-0.74%

-0.38%

-0.36%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-5.64%

-5.22%

-0.42%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

2.21%

1.90%

+0.31%

Volatility

PTLC vs. TRND - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for Pacer Trendpilot US Large Cap ETF (PTLC) is 2.88%, while Pacer Trendpilot Fund of Funds ETF (TRND) has a volatility of 3.56%. This indicates that PTLC experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than TRND based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


PTLCTRNDDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

2.88%

3.56%

-0.68%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

8.15%

8.97%

-0.82%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

11.27%

11.23%

+0.04%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

11.73%

9.71%

+2.02%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

13.17%

11.18%

+1.99%

PTLC vs. TRND - Expense Ratio Comparison

PTLC has a 0.60% expense ratio, which is lower than TRND's 0.77% expense ratio.


Dividends

PTLC vs. TRND - Dividend Comparison

PTLC's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 1.01%, less than TRND's 2.10% yield.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
PTLC
Pacer Trendpilot US Large Cap ETF
1.01%1.06%0.67%1.18%1.26%0.73%1.08%1.10%1.00%0.97%1.08%0.42%
TRND
Pacer Trendpilot Fund of Funds ETF
2.10%2.32%2.31%2.51%1.76%0.93%0.60%0.93%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%

Frequently Asked Questions


With a correlation of 0.95, PTLC and TRND move almost identically. Holding both adds very little diversification - you're essentially doubling your position in the same market segment. Choosing one is usually more capital-efficient.

TRND has higher volatility (3.56%) compared to PTLC (2.88%). In terms of maximum drawdown, PTLC dropped -26.63% vs TRND's -17.88%.

On 5-year performance, PTLC leads with 10.72% vs 6.25% for TRND. On fees, PTLC is cheaper at 0.60% per year. On volatility, PTLC has been the lower-risk option at 2.88%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Over the 5-year period, PTLC has performed better with a 10.72% return vs 6.25%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

PTLC is cheaper with a 0.60% expense ratio, compared with 0.77% for TRND.

TRND has the higher dividend yield at 2.10%, compared with 1.01% for PTLC.

PTLC tracks Pacer Trendpilot U.S. Large Cap Index, while TRND tracks Pacer Trendpilot Fund of Funds Index. Their fees differ too: 0.60% for PTLC and 0.77% for TRND.

TRND currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (1.94 vs 1.91), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for PTLC and TRND

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer