PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
PTLC vs. QTR
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

PTLC vs. QTR - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Pacer Trendpilot US Large Cap ETF (PTLC) and Global X NASDAQ 100 Tail Risk ETF (QTR). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, PTLC achieves a 5.53% return, which is significantly lower than QTR's 17.64% return.


PTLC

1D
-0.74%
1M
4.98%
YTD
5.53%
6M
5.49%
1Y
21.41%
3Y*
14.93%
5Y*
10.72%
10Y*
11.26%

QTR

1D
-0.24%
1M
10.52%
YTD
17.64%
6M
15.72%
1Y
33.76%
3Y*
22.93%
5Y*
10Y*
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

PTLC vs. QTR - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)20252024202320222021
PTLC
Pacer Trendpilot US Large Cap ETF
5.53%5.10%24.31%16.78%-8.62%6.92%
QTR
Global X NASDAQ 100 Tail Risk ETF
17.64%14.52%21.46%45.53%-29.94%4.16%

Correlation

The correlation between PTLC and QTR is 0.92, indicating a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Combining them offers limited diversification - they tend to fall together during downturns.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.92

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.88

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Aug 27, 2021

0.71

Over the past year, PTLC and QTR have become more correlated (0.92) than their long-term average of 0.71, meaning their price movements have been converging.

PTLC vs. QTR - Sectors Allocation Comparison


Sectors
PTLC
QTR

Technology

35.6%
53.8%

Financial Services

11.8%
0.2%

Communication Services

11.2%
15.8%

Consumer Cyclical

10.1%
12.2%

Healthcare

8.5%
4.2%

Industrials

8.3%
2.8%

Consumer Defensive

4.9%
7.7%

Energy

3.5%
0.6%

Utilities

2.3%
1.4%

Real Estate

1.9%
0.1%

Basic Materials

1.8%
1.1%

Technology

PTLC
35.6%
QTR
53.8%

Financial Services

PTLC
11.8%
QTR
0.2%

Communication Services

PTLC
11.2%
QTR
15.8%

Consumer Cyclical

PTLC
10.1%
QTR
12.2%

Healthcare

PTLC
8.5%
QTR
4.2%

Industrials

PTLC
8.3%
QTR
2.8%

Consumer Defensive

PTLC
4.9%
QTR
7.7%

Energy

PTLC
3.5%
QTR
0.6%

Utilities

PTLC
2.3%
QTR
1.4%

Real Estate

PTLC
1.9%
QTR
0.1%

Basic Materials

PTLC
1.8%
QTR
1.1%

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

PTLC vs. QTR — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

PTLC
PTLC Risk / Return Rank: 5353
Overall Rank
PTLC Sharpe Ratio Rank: 5555
Sharpe Ratio Rank
PTLC Sortino Ratio Rank: 5252
Sortino Ratio Rank
PTLC Omega Ratio Rank: 5454
Omega Ratio Rank
PTLC Calmar Ratio Rank: 4949
Calmar Ratio Rank
PTLC Martin Ratio Rank: 5656
Martin Ratio Rank

QTR
QTR Risk / Return Rank: 6464
Overall Rank
QTR Sharpe Ratio Rank: 7272
Sharpe Ratio Rank
QTR Sortino Ratio Rank: 7070
Sortino Ratio Rank
QTR Omega Ratio Rank: 6868
Omega Ratio Rank
QTR Calmar Ratio Rank: 5555
Calmar Ratio Rank
QTR Martin Ratio Rank: 5555
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

PTLC vs. QTR - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Pacer Trendpilot US Large Cap ETF (PTLC) and Global X NASDAQ 100 Tail Risk ETF (QTR). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


PTLCQTRDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

-0.49

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

-0.67

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.34

1.41

-0.07

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

2.45

2.76

-0.31

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

9.71

9.47

+0.23

PTLC vs. QTR - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current PTLC Sharpe Ratio is 1.91, which is comparable to the QTR Sharpe Ratio of 2.40. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of PTLC and QTR, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


PTLCQTRDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

1.91

2.40

-0.49

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.92

Sharpe Ratio (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.86

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

0.70

0.68

+0.02

Drawdowns

PTLC vs. QTR - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum PTLC drawdown since its inception was -26.63%, smaller than the maximum QTR drawdown of -31.72%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for PTLC and QTR.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


PTLCQTRDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-26.63%

-31.72%

+5.09%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-8.77%

-12.29%

+3.52%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-15.17%

-18.99%

+3.82%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-15.17%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-26.63%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-0.74%

-0.24%

-0.50%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-5.64%

-8.84%

+3.20%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

2.21%

3.57%

-1.36%

Volatility

PTLC vs. QTR - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for Pacer Trendpilot US Large Cap ETF (PTLC) is 2.88%, while Global X NASDAQ 100 Tail Risk ETF (QTR) has a volatility of 4.52%. This indicates that PTLC experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than QTR based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


PTLCQTRDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

2.88%

4.52%

-1.64%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

8.15%

10.68%

-2.53%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

11.27%

14.14%

-2.87%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

11.73%

18.10%

-6.37%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

13.17%

18.10%

-4.93%

PTLC vs. QTR - Expense Ratio Comparison

Both PTLC and QTR have an expense ratio of 0.60%.


Dividends

PTLC vs. QTR - Dividend Comparison

PTLC's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 1.01%, less than QTR's 15.96% yield.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
PTLC
Pacer Trendpilot US Large Cap ETF
1.01%1.06%0.67%1.18%1.26%0.73%1.08%1.10%1.00%0.97%1.08%0.42%
QTR
Global X NASDAQ 100 Tail Risk ETF
15.96%18.77%0.50%0.53%0.36%1.90%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%

Frequently Asked Questions


With a correlation of 0.92, PTLC and QTR move almost identically. Holding both adds very little diversification - you're essentially doubling your position in the same market segment. Choosing one is usually more capital-efficient.

QTR has higher volatility (4.52%) compared to PTLC (2.88%). In terms of maximum drawdown, PTLC dropped -26.63% vs QTR's -31.72%.

On 3-year performance, QTR leads with 22.93% vs 14.93% for PTLC. Both ETFs have the same 0.60% expense ratio. On volatility, PTLC has been the lower-risk option at 2.88%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Over the 3-year period, QTR has performed better with a 22.93% return vs 14.93%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

PTLC and QTR have the same expense ratio: 0.60% per year.

QTR has the higher dividend yield at 15.96%, compared with 1.01% for PTLC.

PTLC is categorized as Large Cap Blend Equities, while QTR is Nasdaq-100. PTLC tracks Pacer Trendpilot U.S. Large Cap Index, while QTR tracks NASDAQ-100 Quarterly Protective Put 90 Index. They also come from different issuers: Pacer and Global X.

QTR currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.40 vs 1.91), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for PTLC and QTR

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer