PTLC vs. PSFF

Last updated Jun 4, 2026

PTLC (Pacer Trendpilot US Large Cap ETF) and PSFF (Pacer Swan SOS Fund of Funds ETF) are both exchange-traded funds - PTLC is a Large Cap Blend Equities fund tracking the Pacer Trendpilot U.S. Large Cap Index, while PSFF is a Defined Outcome fund actively managed by Pacer. PTLC is passively managed, while PSFF is actively managed. Over the past 5 years, PTLC returned 10.72%/yr vs 9.43%/yr for PSFF. A 0.75 correlation means they provide meaningful diversification when combined. PTLC charges 0.60%/yr vs 0.75%/yr for PSFF.

Performance

PTLC vs. PSFF - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Pacer Trendpilot US Large Cap ETF (PTLC) and Pacer Swan SOS Fund of Funds ETF (PSFF). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Returns By Period

The year-to-date returns for both investments are quite close, with PTLC having a 5.53% return and PSFF slightly higher at 5.72%.

PTLC

• 1D: -0.74%
• 1M: 4.98%
• YTD: 5.53%
• 6M: 5.49%
• 1Y: 21.41%
• 3Y*: 14.93%
• 5Y*: 10.72%
• 10Y*: 11.26%

PSFF

• 1D: -0.18%
• 1M: 1.85%
• YTD: 5.72%
• 6M: 6.41%
• 1Y: 14.89%
• 3Y*: 13.03%
• 5Y*: 9.43%
• 10Y*: —

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

PTLC vs. PSFF - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020
PTLC Pacer Trendpilot US Large Cap ETF	5.53%	5.10%	24.31%	16.78%	-8.62%	27.90%	0.62%
PSFF Pacer Swan SOS Fund of Funds ETF	5.72%	10.38%	13.18%	18.39%	-4.11%	11.81%	0.37%

Correlation

The correlation between PTLC and PSFF is 0.80, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.

	Correlation
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	0.80
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period	0.80
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period	0.73
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Dec 31, 2020	0.75

The correlation between PTLC and PSFF has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.73 to 0.80 - a consistent structural relationship.

PTLC vs. PSFF - Sectors Allocation Comparison

Sectors	PTLC	PSFF
Technology	35.6%	36.2%
Financial Services	11.8%	11.9%
Communication Services	11.2%	10.9%
Consumer Cyclical	10.1%	10.1%
Healthcare	8.5%	8.4%
Industrials	8.3%	8.1%
Consumer Defensive	4.9%	4.9%
Energy	3.5%	3.5%
Utilities	2.3%	2.3%
Real Estate	1.9%	1.9%
Basic Materials	1.8%	1.8%

Return for Risk

PTLC vs. PSFF — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

PTLC

PTLC Risk / Return Rank: 53
PTLC Sharpe Ratio Rank: 55
PTLC Sortino Ratio Rank: 52
PTLC Omega Ratio Rank: 54
PTLC Calmar Ratio Rank: 49
PTLC Martin Ratio Rank: 56

PSFF

PSFF Risk / Return Rank: 82
PSFF Sharpe Ratio Rank: 76
PSFF Sortino Ratio Rank: 85
PSFF Omega Ratio Rank: 78
PSFF Calmar Ratio Rank: 80
PSFF Martin Ratio Rank: 89

The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

PTLC vs. PSFF - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Pacer Trendpilot US Large Cap ETF (PTLC) and Pacer Swan SOS Fund of Funds ETF (PSFF). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

	PTLC	PSFF	Difference
Sharpe ratio: Return per unit of total volatility	1.91	2.49	-0.58
Sortino ratio: Return per unit of downside risk	2.55	3.82	-1.27
Omega ratio: Gain probability vs. loss probability	1.34	1.47	-0.13
Calmar ratio: Return relative to maximum drawdown	2.45	4.08	-1.62
Martin ratio: Return relative to average drawdown	9.71	20.44	-10.73
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month.

PTLC vs. PSFF - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current PTLC Sharpe Ratio is 1.91, which is comparable to the PSFF Sharpe Ratio of 2.49. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of PTLC and PSFF, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.

Sharpe Ratios by Period

	PTLC	PSFF	Difference
Sharpe Ratio (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	1.91	2.49	-0.58
Sharpe Ratio (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period	0.92	1.03	-0.11
Sharpe Ratio (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period	0.86	—	—
Sharpe Ratio (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history	0.70	1.11	-0.41

Drawdowns

PTLC vs. PSFF - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum PTLC drawdown since its inception was -26.63%, which is greater than PSFF's maximum drawdown of -10.78%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for PTLC and PSFF.

Drawdown Indicators

	PTLC	PSFF	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	-26.63%	-10.78%	-15.85%
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	-8.77%	-3.67%	-5.10%
Max Drawdown (3Y) Largest decline over 3 years	-15.17%	-10.78%	-4.39%
Max Drawdown (5Y) Largest decline over 5 years	-15.17%	-10.78%	-4.39%
Max Drawdown (10Y) Largest decline over 10 years	-26.63%	—	—
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	-0.74%	-0.18%	-0.56%
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	-5.64%	-1.60%	-4.04%
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	2.21%	0.73%	+1.48%

Volatility

PTLC vs. PSFF - Volatility Comparison

Pacer Trendpilot US Large Cap ETF (PTLC) has a higher volatility of 2.88% compared to Pacer Swan SOS Fund of Funds ETF (PSFF) at 1.02%. This indicates that PTLC's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than PSFF based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.

Volatility by Period

	PTLC	PSFF	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	2.88%	1.02%	+1.86%
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	8.15%	4.54%	+3.61%
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	11.27%	6.08%	+5.19%
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	11.73%	9.22%	+2.51%
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	13.17%	9.10%	+4.07%

PTLC vs. PSFF - Expense Ratio Comparison

PTLC has a 0.60% expense ratio, which is lower than PSFF's 0.75% expense ratio.

Dividends

PTLC vs. PSFF - Dividend Comparison

PTLC's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 1.01%, while PSFF has not paid dividends to shareholders.

Position	TTM	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020	2019	2018	2017	2016	2015
PSFF Pacer Swan SOS Fund of Funds ETF	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.01%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%
PTLC Pacer Trendpilot US Large Cap ETF	1.01%	1.06%	0.67%	1.18%	1.26%	0.73%	1.08%	1.10%	1.00%	0.97%	1.08%	0.42%

Frequently Asked Questions

Can I hold both PTLC and PSFF in my portfolio?

PTLC and PSFF have a correlation of 0.80, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

Which is riskier, PTLC or PSFF?

PTLC has higher volatility (2.88%) compared to PSFF (1.02%). In terms of maximum drawdown, PTLC dropped -26.63% vs PSFF's -10.78%.

Which ETF is better, PTLC or PSFF?

On 5-year performance, PTLC leads with 10.72% vs 9.43% for PSFF. On fees, PTLC is cheaper at 0.60% per year. On volatility, PSFF has been the lower-risk option at 1.02%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Which ETF has performed better, PTLC or PSFF?

Over the 5-year period, PTLC has performed better with a 10.72% return vs 9.43%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

Which ETF is cheaper, PTLC or PSFF?

PTLC is cheaper with a 0.60% expense ratio, compared with 0.75% for PSFF.

Which ETF pays a higher dividend yield, PTLC or PSFF?

PTLC has the higher dividend yield at 1.01%, compared with 0.00% for PSFF.

What is the main difference between PTLC and PSFF?

PTLC is categorized as Large Cap Blend Equities, while PSFF is Defined Outcome. Their fees differ too: 0.60% for PTLC and 0.75% for PSFF.

Which has better risk-adjusted returns?

PSFF currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.49 vs 1.91), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.