PTIR vs. XDSQ

Last updated Jun 26, 2026

PTIR (GraniteShares 2x Long PLTR Daily ETF) and XDSQ (Innovator US Equity Accelerated ETF) are both Leveraged Equities funds. Both are actively managed. Over the past year, PTIR returned -61.24% vs 14.87% for XDSQ. At a 0.49 correlation, their price movements are largely independent. PTIR charges 1.15%/yr vs 0.79%/yr for XDSQ.

Performance

PTIR vs. XDSQ - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in GraniteShares 2x Long PLTR Daily ETF (PTIR) and Innovator US Equity Accelerated ETF (XDSQ). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, PTIR achieves a -70.11% return, which is significantly lower than XDSQ's 3.09% return.

PTIR

• 1D: -10.83%
• 1M: -41.16%
• YTD: -70.11%
• 6M: -75.03%
• 1Y: -61.24%
• 3Y*: —
• 5Y*: —
• 10Y*: —

XDSQ

• 1D: -0.01%
• 1M: 0.67%
• YTD: 3.09%
• 6M: 1.78%
• 1Y: 14.87%
• 3Y*: 14.49%
• 5Y*: 9.69%
• 10Y*: —

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

PTIR vs. XDSQ - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)	2025	2024
PTIR GraniteShares 2x Long PLTR Daily ETF	-70.11%	221.36%	425.36%
XDSQ Innovator US Equity Accelerated ETF	3.09%	14.22%	7.81%

Correlation

The correlation between PTIR and XDSQ is 0.42, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.

	Correlation
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	0.42
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Sep 4, 2024	0.49

PTIR vs. XDSQ - Sectors Allocation Comparison

Sectors	PTIR	XDSQ
Technology	100.0%	39.1%
Basic Materials	-	1.7%
Communication Services	-	10.7%
Consumer Cyclical	-	9.9%
Consumer Defensive	-	4.5%
Energy	-	3.1%
Financial Services	-	10.9%
Healthcare	-	8.3%
Industrials	-	7.8%
Real Estate	-	1.8%
Utilities	-	2.1%

Return for Risk

PTIR vs. XDSQ — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

PTIR

PTIR Risk / Return Rank: 4
PTIR Sharpe Ratio Rank: 5
PTIR Sortino Ratio Rank: 5
PTIR Omega Ratio Rank: 5
PTIR Calmar Ratio Rank: 3
PTIR Martin Ratio Rank: 2

XDSQ

XDSQ Risk / Return Rank: 45
XDSQ Sharpe Ratio Rank: 46
XDSQ Sortino Ratio Rank: 43
XDSQ Omega Ratio Rank: 54
XDSQ Calmar Ratio Rank: 34
XDSQ Martin Ratio Rank: 50

The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

PTIR vs. XDSQ - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for GraniteShares 2x Long PLTR Daily ETF (PTIR) and Innovator US Equity Accelerated ETF (XDSQ). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.

	PTIR	XDSQ	Difference
Sharpe ratio: Return per unit of total volatility	-0.59	1.42	-2.02
Sortino ratio: Return per unit of downside risk	-0.52	1.97	-2.49
Omega ratio: Gain probability vs. loss probability	0.94	1.30	-0.36
Calmar ratio: Return relative to maximum drawdown	-0.77	1.56	-2.33
Martin ratio: Return relative to average drawdown	-1.42	7.42	-8.84

PTIR vs. XDSQ - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current PTIR Sharpe Ratio is -0.59, which is lower than the XDSQ Sharpe Ratio of 1.42. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of PTIR and XDSQ, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.

Drawdowns

PTIR vs. XDSQ - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum PTIR drawdown since its inception was -79.40%, which is greater than XDSQ's maximum drawdown of -26.06%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for PTIR and XDSQ.

Drawdown Indicators

	PTIR	XDSQ	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	-79.40%	-26.06%	-53.34%
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	-79.40%	-9.60%	-69.80%
Max Drawdown (3Y) Largest decline over 3 years	—	-19.15%	—
Max Drawdown (5Y) Largest decline over 5 years	—	-26.06%	—
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	-79.40%	-0.01%	-79.39%
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	-28.82%	-4.91%	-23.91%
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	43.08%	2.01%	+41.07%

Volatility

PTIR vs. XDSQ - Volatility Comparison

GraniteShares 2x Long PLTR Daily ETF (PTIR) has a higher volatility of 39.22% compared to Innovator US Equity Accelerated ETF (XDSQ) at 0.59%. This indicates that PTIR's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than XDSQ based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.

Volatility by Period

	PTIR	XDSQ	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	39.22%	0.59%	+38.63%
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	78.07%	7.96%	+70.11%
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	103.20%	10.50%	+92.70%
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	128.88%	15.28%	+113.60%
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	128.88%	15.01%	+113.87%

PTIR vs. XDSQ - Expense Ratio Comparison

PTIR has a 1.15% expense ratio, which is higher than XDSQ's 0.79% expense ratio.

Dividends

PTIR vs. XDSQ - Dividend Comparison

PTIR's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 19.44%, while XDSQ has not paid dividends to shareholders.

Position	TTM	2025
PTIR GraniteShares 2x Long PLTR Daily ETF	19.44%	5.81%
XDSQ Innovator US Equity Accelerated ETF	0.00%	0.00%

Frequently Asked Questions

Can I hold both PTIR and XDSQ in my portfolio?

PTIR and XDSQ have a correlation of 0.42, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

Which is riskier, PTIR or XDSQ?

PTIR has higher volatility (39.22%) compared to XDSQ (0.59%). In terms of maximum drawdown, PTIR dropped -79.40% vs XDSQ's -26.06%.

Which ETF is better, PTIR or XDSQ?

On 1-year performance, XDSQ leads with 14.87% vs -61.24% for PTIR. On fees, XDSQ is cheaper at 0.79% per year. On volatility, XDSQ has been the lower-risk option at 0.59%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Which ETF has performed better, PTIR or XDSQ?

Over the 1-year period, XDSQ has performed better with a 14.87% return vs -61.24%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

Which ETF is cheaper, PTIR or XDSQ?

XDSQ is cheaper with a 0.79% expense ratio, compared with 1.15% for PTIR.

Which ETF pays a higher dividend yield, PTIR or XDSQ?

PTIR has the higher dividend yield at 19.44%, compared with 0.00% for XDSQ.

What is the main difference between PTIR and XDSQ?

They also come from different issuers: GraniteShares and Innovator. Their fees differ too: 1.15% for PTIR and 0.79% for XDSQ.

Which has better risk-adjusted returns?

XDSQ currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (1.42 vs -0.59), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.