PTIR vs. QTJL
PTIR (GraniteShares 2x Long PLTR Daily ETF) and QTJL (Innovator Growth Accelerated Plus ETF - July) are both Leveraged Equities funds. PTIR is passively managed, while QTJL is actively managed. Over the past year, PTIR returned -42.21% vs 14.88% for QTJL. A 0.52 correlation means they provide meaningful diversification when combined. PTIR charges 1.04%/yr vs 0.79%/yr for QTJL.
Performance
PTIR vs. QTJL - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, PTIR achieves a -56.90% return, which is significantly lower than QTJL's 4.97% return.
PTIR
- 1D
- 5.11%
- 1M
- -0.35%
- 6M
- -57.27%
- YTD
- -56.90%
- 1Y
- -42.21%
- 3Y*
- —
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
QTJL
- 1D
- -1.54%
- 1M
- -1.99%
- 6M
- 3.87%
- YTD
- 4.97%
- 1Y
- 14.88%
- 3Y*
- 17.19%
- 5Y*
- 9.67%
- 10Y*
- —
PTIR vs. QTJL - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | |
|---|---|---|---|
PTIR GraniteShares 2x Long PLTR Daily ETF | -56.90% | 221.36% | 425.36% |
QTJL Innovator Growth Accelerated Plus ETF - July | 4.97% | 21.07% | 10.52% |
Correlation
The correlation between PTIR and QTJL is 0.43, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.43 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Sep 4, 2024 | 0.52 |
The correlation between PTIR and QTJL has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.43 to 0.52 - a consistent structural relationship.
PTIR vs. QTJL - Sectors Allocation Comparison
Sectors
PTIR
QTJL
Technology
Basic Materials
-
Communication Services
-
Consumer Cyclical
-
Consumer Defensive
-
Energy
-
Financial Services
-
Healthcare
-
Industrials
-
Real Estate
-
Utilities
-
Technology
PTIR
QTJL
Basic Materials
PTIR
-
QTJL
Communication Services
PTIR
-
QTJL
Consumer Cyclical
PTIR
-
QTJL
Consumer Defensive
PTIR
-
QTJL
Energy
PTIR
-
QTJL
Financial Services
PTIR
-
QTJL
Healthcare
PTIR
-
QTJL
Industrials
PTIR
-
QTJL
Real Estate
PTIR
-
QTJL
Utilities
PTIR
-
QTJL
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
PTIR vs. QTJL — Risk / Return Rank
PTIR
QTJL
PTIR vs. QTJL - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for GraniteShares 2x Long PLTR Daily ETF (PTIR) and Innovator Growth Accelerated Plus ETF - July (QTJL). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.
| PTIR | QTJL | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | -1.84 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | -2.05 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.00 | 1.29 | -0.29 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | -0.53 | 2.24 | -2.77 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | -0.93 | 11.30 | -12.23 |
Loading charts...
Drawdowns
PTIR vs. QTJL - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum PTIR drawdown since its inception was -79.40%, which is greater than QTJL's maximum drawdown of -33.40%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for PTIR and QTJL.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| PTIR | QTJL | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -79.40% | -33.40% | -46.00% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -79.40% | -6.68% | -72.72% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | — | -22.43% | — |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | — | -33.40% | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -70.30% | -2.39% | -67.91% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -29.84% | -7.78% | -22.06% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 45.56% | 1.32% | +44.24% |
Volatility
PTIR vs. QTJL - Volatility Comparison
GraniteShares 2x Long PLTR Daily ETF (PTIR) has a higher volatility of 32.96% compared to Innovator Growth Accelerated Plus ETF - July (QTJL) at 3.81%. This indicates that PTIR's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than QTJL based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| PTIR | QTJL | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 32.96% | 3.81% | +29.15% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 79.46% | 8.24% | +71.22% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 103.06% | 10.50% | +92.56% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 128.33% | 20.33% | +108.00% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 128.33% | 20.27% | +108.06% |
PTIR vs. QTJL - Expense Ratio Comparison
PTIR has a 1.04% expense ratio, which is higher than QTJL's 0.79% expense ratio.
Dividends
PTIR vs. QTJL - Dividend Comparison
PTIR's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 13.48%, while QTJL has not paid dividends to shareholders.
| Position | TTM | 2025 |
|---|---|---|
PTIR GraniteShares 2x Long PLTR Daily ETF | 13.48% | 5.81% |
QTJL Innovator Growth Accelerated Plus ETF - July | 0.00% | 0.00% |
Frequently Asked Questions
PTIR and QTJL have a correlation of 0.43, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
PTIR has higher volatility (32.96%) compared to QTJL (3.81%). In terms of maximum drawdown, PTIR dropped -79.40% vs QTJL's -33.40%.
On 1-year performance, QTJL leads with 14.88% vs -42.21% for PTIR. On fees, QTJL is cheaper at 0.79% per year. On volatility, QTJL has been the lower-risk option at 3.81%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
Over the 1-year period, QTJL has performed better with a 14.88% return vs -42.21%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.
QTJL is cheaper with a 0.79% expense ratio, compared with 1.04% for PTIR.
PTIR has the higher dividend yield at 13.48%, compared with 0.00% for QTJL.
They also come from different issuers: GraniteShares and Innovator. Their fees differ too: 1.04% for PTIR and 0.79% for QTJL.
QTJL currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (1.43 vs -0.41), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for PTIR and QTJL
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer