PTIR vs. QTAP
PTIR (GraniteShares 2x Long PLTR Daily ETF) and QTAP (Innovator Growth Accelerated Plus ETF - April) are both Leveraged Equities funds. Both are actively managed. Over the past year, PTIR returned -52.03% vs 22.41% for QTAP. A 0.51 correlation means they provide meaningful diversification when combined. PTIR charges 1.15%/yr vs 0.79%/yr for QTAP.
Performance
PTIR vs. QTAP - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, PTIR achieves a -64.50% return, which is significantly lower than QTAP's 12.83% return.
PTIR
- 1D
- -4.81%
- 1M
- -30.43%
- YTD
- -64.50%
- 6M
- -70.36%
- 1Y
- -52.03%
- 3Y*
- —
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
QTAP
- 1D
- -1.14%
- 1M
- -0.91%
- YTD
- 12.83%
- 6M
- 13.01%
- 1Y
- 22.41%
- 3Y*
- 19.78%
- 5Y*
- 12.65%
- 10Y*
- —
PTIR vs. QTAP - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | |
|---|---|---|---|
PTIR GraniteShares 2x Long PLTR Daily ETF | -64.50% | 221.36% | 425.36% |
QTAP Innovator Growth Accelerated Plus ETF - April | 12.83% | 19.36% | 9.31% |
Correlation
The correlation between PTIR and QTAP is 0.41, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.41 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Sep 4, 2024 | 0.51 |
The correlation between PTIR and QTAP has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.41 to 0.51 - a consistent structural relationship.
PTIR vs. QTAP - Sectors Allocation Comparison
Sectors
PTIR
QTAP
Technology
Basic Materials
-
Communication Services
-
Consumer Cyclical
-
Consumer Defensive
-
Energy
-
Financial Services
-
Healthcare
-
Industrials
-
Real Estate
-
Utilities
-
Technology
PTIR
QTAP
Basic Materials
PTIR
-
QTAP
Communication Services
PTIR
-
QTAP
Consumer Cyclical
PTIR
-
QTAP
Consumer Defensive
PTIR
-
QTAP
Energy
PTIR
-
QTAP
Financial Services
PTIR
-
QTAP
Healthcare
PTIR
-
QTAP
Industrials
PTIR
-
QTAP
Real Estate
PTIR
-
QTAP
Utilities
PTIR
-
QTAP
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
PTIR vs. QTAP — Risk / Return Rank
PTIR
QTAP
PTIR vs. QTAP - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for GraniteShares 2x Long PLTR Daily ETF (PTIR) and Innovator Growth Accelerated Plus ETF - April (QTAP). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.
| PTIR | QTAP | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | -4.20 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | -6.28 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 0.97 | 1.94 | -0.97 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | -0.69 | 9.04 | -9.73 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | -1.22 | 52.85 | -54.07 |
Loading charts...
Drawdowns
PTIR vs. QTAP - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum PTIR drawdown since its inception was -75.53%, which is greater than QTAP's maximum drawdown of -29.44%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for PTIR and QTAP.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| PTIR | QTAP | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -75.53% | -29.44% | -46.09% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -75.53% | -2.49% | -73.04% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | — | -13.03% | — |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | — | -29.44% | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -75.53% | -1.70% | -73.83% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -28.60% | -4.99% | -23.61% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 42.52% | 0.43% | +42.09% |
Volatility
PTIR vs. QTAP - Volatility Comparison
GraniteShares 2x Long PLTR Daily ETF (PTIR) has a higher volatility of 37.93% compared to Innovator Growth Accelerated Plus ETF - April (QTAP) at 3.03%. This indicates that PTIR's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than QTAP based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| PTIR | QTAP | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 37.93% | 3.03% | +34.90% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 77.76% | 4.94% | +72.82% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 102.66% | 6.12% | +96.54% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 128.79% | 18.92% | +109.87% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 128.79% | 18.72% | +110.07% |
PTIR vs. QTAP - Expense Ratio Comparison
PTIR has a 1.15% expense ratio, which is higher than QTAP's 0.79% expense ratio.
Dividends
PTIR vs. QTAP - Dividend Comparison
PTIR's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 16.37%, while QTAP has not paid dividends to shareholders.
| Position | TTM | 2025 |
|---|---|---|
PTIR GraniteShares 2x Long PLTR Daily ETF | 16.37% | 5.81% |
QTAP Innovator Growth Accelerated Plus ETF - April | 0.00% | 0.00% |
Frequently Asked Questions
PTIR and QTAP have a correlation of 0.41, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
PTIR has higher volatility (37.93%) compared to QTAP (3.03%). In terms of maximum drawdown, PTIR dropped -75.53% vs QTAP's -29.44%.
On 1-year performance, QTAP leads with 22.41% vs -52.03% for PTIR. On fees, QTAP is cheaper at 0.79% per year. On volatility, QTAP has been the lower-risk option at 3.03%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
Over the 1-year period, QTAP has performed better with a 22.41% return vs -52.03%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.
QTAP is cheaper with a 0.79% expense ratio, compared with 1.15% for PTIR.
PTIR has the higher dividend yield at 16.37%, compared with 0.00% for QTAP.
They also come from different issuers: GraniteShares and Innovator. Their fees differ too: 1.15% for PTIR and 0.79% for QTAP.
QTAP currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (3.70 vs -0.51), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for PTIR and QTAP
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer