PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
PTIR vs. BILT
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

PTIR vs. BILT - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in GraniteShares 2x Long PLTR Daily ETF (PTIR) and iShares Infrastructure Active ETF (BILT). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, PTIR achieves a -60.42% return, which is significantly lower than BILT's 13.73% return.


PTIR

1D
4.65%
1M
-7.52%
6M
-41.51%
YTD
-60.42%
1Y
-54.43%
3Y*
5Y*
10Y*
ALL TIME*
170.19%

BILT

1D
-0.50%
1M
-1.54%
6M
9.37%
YTD
13.73%
1Y
17.39%
3Y*
5Y*
10Y*
ALL TIME*
18.31%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

Liquidity Comparison


PositionAvg. Volume Value (2W)Avg. Volume Value (1M)Avg. Volume Value (3M)
$2.26M$1.67M$1.68M
$39.00M$49.18M$63.74M

PTIR vs. BILT - Yearly Performance Comparison


Correlation

The correlation between PTIR and BILT is -0.14, meaning they have often moved in opposite directions in the past. This relationship can weaken or reverse as market conditions change.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Focuses on recent behavior, but can change the most.

-0.14

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Jul 31, 2025

-0.15

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

PTIR vs. BILT — Risk / Return Rank

Compare historical risk-adjusted metric ranks over the past 12 months.

PTIR
PTIR Risk / Return Rank: 55
Overall Rank
PTIR Sharpe Ratio Rank: 55
Sharpe Ratio Rank
PTIR Sortino Ratio Rank: 77
Sortino Ratio Rank
PTIR Omega Ratio Rank: 77
Omega Ratio Rank
PTIR Calmar Ratio Rank: 44
Calmar Ratio Rank
PTIR Martin Ratio Rank: 44
Martin Ratio Rank

BILT
BILT Risk / Return Rank: 7272
Overall Rank
BILT Sharpe Ratio Rank: 6969
Sharpe Ratio Rank
BILT Sortino Ratio Rank: 6868
Sortino Ratio Rank
BILT Omega Ratio Rank: 6767
Omega Ratio Rank
BILT Calmar Ratio Rank: 8383
Calmar Ratio Rank
BILT Martin Ratio Rank: 7373
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) uses a weighted average of the Sharpe, Sortino, Omega, Calmar, and Martin percentile ranks for the trailing 12 months. Higher means stronger historical risk-adjusted performance within the peer group.

PTIR vs. BILT - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for GraniteShares 2x Long PLTR Daily ETF (PTIR) and iShares Infrastructure Active ETF (BILT). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.


PTIRBILTDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

-2.22

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

-2.68

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

0.96

1.30

-0.34

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

-0.69

3.25

-3.93

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

-1.12

9.73

-10.85

PTIR vs. BILT - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current PTIR Sharpe Ratio is -0.52, which is lower than the BILT Sharpe Ratio of 1.70. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of PTIR and BILT, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Drawdowns

PTIR vs. BILT - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum PTIR drawdown since its inception was -79.40%, which is greater than BILT's maximum drawdown of -5.38%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for PTIR and BILT.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


PTIRBILTDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-79.40%

-5.38%

-74.02%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-79.40%

-5.38%

-74.02%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-72.72%

-2.73%

-69.99%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-31.14%

-1.37%

-29.77%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

48.78%

1.79%

+46.99%

Volatility

PTIR vs. BILT - Volatility Comparison

GraniteShares 2x Long PLTR Daily ETF (PTIR) has a higher volatility of 27.20% compared to iShares Infrastructure Active ETF (BILT) at 2.62%. This indicates that PTIR's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than BILT based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


PTIRBILTDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

27.20%

2.62%

+24.58%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

81.38%

8.46%

+72.92%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

104.63%

10.32%

+94.31%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

127.56%

10.30%

+117.26%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

127.56%

10.30%

+117.26%

PTIR vs. BILT - Expense Ratio Comparison

PTIR has a 1.04% expense ratio, which is higher than BILT's 0.60% expense ratio.


Dividends

PTIR vs. BILT - Dividend Comparison

PTIR's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 14.68%, more than BILT's 5.73% yield.


Frequently Asked Questions


PTIR and BILT have a correlation of -0.14, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

PTIR has higher volatility (27.20%) compared to BILT (2.62%). In terms of maximum drawdown, PTIR dropped -79.40% vs BILT's -5.38%.

On 1-year performance, BILT leads with 17.39% vs -54.43% for PTIR. On fees, BILT is cheaper at 0.60% per year. On volatility, BILT has been the lower-risk option at 2.62%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Over the 1-year period, BILT has performed better with a 17.39% return vs -54.43%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

BILT is cheaper with a 0.60% expense ratio, compared with 1.04% for PTIR.

PTIR has the higher dividend yield at 14.68%, compared with 5.73% for BILT.

PTIR is categorized as Leveraged Equities, while BILT is Infrastructure Equities. They also come from different issuers: GraniteShares and iShares. Their fees differ too: 1.04% for PTIR and 0.60% for BILT.

BILT currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (1.70 vs -0.52), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for PTIR and BILT

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer