PTIR vs. AAPB

Last updated Jun 24, 2026

PTIR (GraniteShares 2x Long PLTR Daily ETF) and AAPB (GraniteShares 2x Long AAPL Daily ETF) are both Leveraged Equities funds from GraniteShares. Both are actively managed. Over the past year, PTIR returned -52.03% vs 90.68% for AAPB. At a 0.17 correlation, their price movements are largely independent. Both charge a 1.15% expense ratio.

Performance

PTIR vs. AAPB - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in GraniteShares 2x Long PLTR Daily ETF (PTIR) and GraniteShares 2x Long AAPL Daily ETF (AAPB). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, PTIR achieves a -64.50% return, which is significantly lower than AAPB's 10.97% return.

PTIR

• 1D: -4.81%
• 1M: -30.43%
• YTD: -64.50%
• 6M: -70.36%
• 1Y: -52.03%
• 3Y*: —
• 5Y*: —
• 10Y*: —

AAPB

• 1D: -1.59%
• 1M: -9.88%
• YTD: 10.97%
• 6M: 10.46%
• 1Y: 90.68%
• 3Y*: 17.03%
• 5Y*: —
• 10Y*: —

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

PTIR vs. AAPB - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)	2025	2024
PTIR GraniteShares 2x Long PLTR Daily ETF	-64.50%	221.36%	425.36%
AAPB GraniteShares 2x Long AAPL Daily ETF	10.97%	-0.93%	22.13%

Correlation

The correlation between PTIR and AAPB is 0.08, meaning there is essentially no relationship between their price movements. Each responds to its own set of market drivers, making them strong candidates for combining in a diversified portfolio.

	Correlation
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	0.08
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Sep 4, 2024	0.17

PTIR vs. AAPB - Sectors Allocation Comparison

Sectors	PTIR	AAPB
Technology	100.0%	66.7%
Basic Materials	-	-
Communication Services	-	-
Consumer Cyclical	-	-
Consumer Defensive	-	-
Energy	-	-
Financial Services	-	-
Healthcare	-	-
Industrials	-	-
Real Estate	-	-
Utilities	-	-

Return for Risk

PTIR vs. AAPB — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

PTIR

PTIR Risk / Return Rank: 5
PTIR Sharpe Ratio Rank: 5
PTIR Sortino Ratio Rank: 6
PTIR Omega Ratio Rank: 6
PTIR Calmar Ratio Rank: 3
PTIR Martin Ratio Rank: 3

AAPB

AAPB Risk / Return Rank: 60
AAPB Sharpe Ratio Rank: 65
AAPB Sortino Ratio Rank: 59
AAPB Omega Ratio Rank: 58
AAPB Calmar Ratio Rank: 68
AAPB Martin Ratio Rank: 48

The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

PTIR vs. AAPB - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for GraniteShares 2x Long PLTR Daily ETF (PTIR) and GraniteShares 2x Long AAPL Daily ETF (AAPB). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.

	PTIR	AAPB	Difference
Sharpe ratio: Return per unit of total volatility	-0.51	2.01	-2.52
Sortino ratio: Return per unit of downside risk	-0.26	2.64	-2.90
Omega ratio: Gain probability vs. loss probability	0.97	1.34	-0.37
Calmar ratio: Return relative to maximum drawdown	-0.69	3.24	-3.93
Martin ratio: Return relative to average drawdown	-1.22	7.65	-8.88

PTIR vs. AAPB - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current PTIR Sharpe Ratio is -0.51, which is lower than the AAPB Sharpe Ratio of 2.01. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of PTIR and AAPB, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.

Drawdowns

PTIR vs. AAPB - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum PTIR drawdown since its inception was -75.53%, which is greater than AAPB's maximum drawdown of -58.13%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for PTIR and AAPB.

Drawdown Indicators

	PTIR	AAPB	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	-75.53%	-58.13%	-17.40%
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	-75.53%	-28.11%	-47.42%
Max Drawdown (3Y) Largest decline over 3 years	—	-58.13%	—
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	-75.53%	-13.26%	-62.27%
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	-28.60%	-19.23%	-9.37%
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	42.52%	11.89%	+30.63%

Volatility

PTIR vs. AAPB - Volatility Comparison

GraniteShares 2x Long PLTR Daily ETF (PTIR) has a higher volatility of 37.93% compared to GraniteShares 2x Long AAPL Daily ETF (AAPB) at 14.32%. This indicates that PTIR's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than AAPB based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.

Volatility by Period

	PTIR	AAPB	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	37.93%	14.32%	+23.61%
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	77.76%	33.46%	+44.30%
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	102.66%	45.34%	+57.32%
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	128.79%	51.27%	+77.52%
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	128.79%	51.27%	+77.52%

PTIR vs. AAPB - Expense Ratio Comparison

Both PTIR and AAPB have an expense ratio of 1.15%.

Dividends

PTIR vs. AAPB - Dividend Comparison

PTIR's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 16.37%, more than AAPB's 3.96% yield.

Position	TTM	2025	2024	2023
AAPB GraniteShares 2x Long AAPL Daily ETF	3.96%	4.39%	0.00%	18.75%
PTIR GraniteShares 2x Long PLTR Daily ETF	16.37%	5.81%	0.00%	0.00%

Frequently Asked Questions

Can I hold both PTIR and AAPB in my portfolio?

PTIR and AAPB have a correlation of 0.08, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

Which is riskier, PTIR or AAPB?

PTIR has higher volatility (37.93%) compared to AAPB (14.32%). In terms of maximum drawdown, PTIR dropped -75.53% vs AAPB's -58.13%.

Which ETF is better, PTIR or AAPB?

On 1-year performance, AAPB leads with 90.68% vs -52.03% for PTIR. Both ETFs have the same 1.15% expense ratio. On volatility, AAPB has been the lower-risk option at 14.32%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Which ETF has performed better, PTIR or AAPB?

Over the 1-year period, AAPB has performed better with a 90.68% return vs -52.03%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

Which ETF is cheaper, PTIR or AAPB?

PTIR and AAPB have the same expense ratio: 1.15% per year.

Which ETF pays a higher dividend yield, PTIR or AAPB?

PTIR has the higher dividend yield at 16.37%, compared with 3.96% for AAPB.

Which has better risk-adjusted returns?

AAPB currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.01 vs -0.51), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.